Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: Use of microsimulation

被引:16
|
作者
Puvimanasinghe, JPA
Takkenberg, JJM
Eijkemans, MJC
Steyerber, EW
van Herwerden, LA
Grunkemeier, GL
Habbema, JDF
Bogers, AJJC
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Providence Hlth Syst, Portland, OR USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2005年 / 80卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.064
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. The second-generation Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, CA) is widely used for aortic valve replacement. However, knowledge on the long-term outcomes of patients after valve implantation is incomplete. We used microsimulation to calculate the long-term outcome of any given patient after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve. Methods. A meta-analysis of 8 reports on aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve (2,685 patients; 12,250 patient years) was used to estimate the hazards of valve-related events other than structural valvular deterioration. Structural valvular deterioration was described by age-dependent Weibull curves calculated from 18-year follow-up, premarket approval, Carpentier-Edwards pericardial primary data. These estimates provided the input data for the parameters of the microsimulation model, which was then used to calculate the outcomes of patients of different ages after valve implantation. The model estimates of survival were validated using two external data sets. Results. The Weibull analysis estimated a median time to reoperation for structural valvular deterioration ranging from 18.1 years for a 55-year-old male to 23.2 years for a 75-year-old male. For a 65-year-old male, microsimulation calculated a life expectancy and event-free life expectancy of 10.8 and 9.1 years, respectively. The lifetime risk of at least one valve-related event was 38% and that of reoperation due to structural valvular deterioration 17%, respectively, for this patient. The model estimates of survival showed good agreement with external data. Conclusions. Microsimulation provides detailed insight into the long-term prognosis of patients after aortic valve replacement. The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve performs satisfactorily and offers a low lifetime risk of reoperation due to structural valvular deterioration, especially for elderly patients requiring aortic valve replacement.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 831
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve in middle-aged patients: Comparison with the St. Jude Medical valve
    Sakamoto Y.
    Hashimoto K.
    Okuyama H.
    Ishii S.
    Inoue T.
    Kinouchi K.
    Abe T.
    The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2005, 53 (9): : 465 - 469
  • [42] Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve
    Flameng, Willem
    Meuris, Bart
    Herijgers, Paul
    Herregods, Marie-Christine
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 82 (02): : 530 - 536
  • [43] Suture less Perceval Aortic Valve in Comparison with the Stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Aortic Valve
    Koenig, Karl Christian
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    Scherner, Maximilian
    Wippermann, Jens
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2014, 23 (02): : 253 - 258
  • [44] Eight year comparative follow-up after aortic valve replacement with two types of pericardial prosthesis (pericarbon sorin and Carpentier-Edwards)
    Le Tourneau, T
    Granmougin, D
    Hennequin, JL
    Dubar, A
    Warembourg, H
    CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (17) : 543 - 543
  • [45] Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis
    Banbury, MK
    Cosgrove, DM
    White, JA
    Blackstone, EH
    Frater, RWM
    Okies, JE
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (03): : 753 - 757
  • [46] Twelve-Year Experience with the Carpentier-Edwards Pericardial Aortic Valve - A Single Japanese Center Experience
    Arinaga, K.
    Ueda, T.
    Mori, R.
    Akasu, K.
    Kosuga, T.
    Tomoeda, H.
    Chihara, S.
    Fukunaga, S.
    Aoyagi, S.
    CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 115 (04) : 251 - 251
  • [47] Carpentier-Edwards supraannular porcine bioprosthesis: Second-generation prosthesis in aortic valve replacement
    Jamieson, WRE
    Janusz, MT
    Burr, LH
    Ling, H
    Miyagishima, RT
    Germann, E
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 71 (05): : S224 - S227
  • [48] Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement
    Jamieson, WRE
    David, TE
    Feindel, CMS
    Miyagishima, RT
    Germann, E
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2002, 11 (03): : 424 - 430
  • [49] MITRAL-VALVE CARPENTIER-EDWARDS BIOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT, THROMBOEMBOLISM, AND ANTICOAGULANTS
    LOUAGIE, YA
    JAMART, J
    EUCHER, P
    BUCHE, M
    SCHOEVAERDTS, JC
    EDMUNDS, LH
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1993, 56 (04): : 931 - 937
  • [50] Leaflet detachment in a Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna mitral pericardial valve bioprosthesis
    Elena Arnaiz-Garcia, Maria
    Maria Gonzalez-Santos, Jose
    Iscar-Galan, Alberto
    Javier Lopez-Rodriguez, Francisco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (06) : 1293 - 1293