Electron dosimetry based on the absorbed dose to water concept:: A comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and DIN 6800-2 protocols

被引:10
|
作者
Dohm, OS
Christ, G
Nüsslin, F
Schüle, E
Bruggmoser, G
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Klin Radioonkol, Abt Med Phys, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] PTW Freiburg, D-79115 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg Klinikum, Abt Strahlentherapie, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
electron dosimetry; absorbed dose to water; Roos chamber; perturbation correction;
D O I
10.1118/1.1414008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The dosimetry protocols DIN 6800-2 and AAPM TG-51, both based on the absorbed dose to water concept, are compared in their theoretical background and in their application to electron dosimetry. The agreement and disagreement in correction factors and energy parameters used in both protocols will be shown and discussed. Measurements with three different types of ionization chambers were performed and evaluated according to both protocols. As a result the perturbation correction factor P-wall(60Co) for the Roos chamber was determined to 1.024 +/- 0.5%. (C) 2001 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2258 / 2264
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Comparison of the recommendations of the AAPM TG-51 and TG-51 addendum reference dosimetry protocols
    McCaw, Travis J.
    Hwang, Min-Sig
    Jang, Si Young
    Huq, M. Saiful
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (04): : 140 - 143
  • [2] Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams
    Huq, MS
    Andreo, P
    Song, HJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (11): : 2985 - 3006
  • [3] AAPM TG-51 Protocol: The absorbed dose calibration
    Hanson, WF
    GENERAL PRACTICE OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, (26): : 139 - 157
  • [4] Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: Comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols
    Huq, MS
    Song, HJ
    Andreo, P
    Houser, CJ
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (10) : 2077 - 2087
  • [5] Comparison of Two Photon Dosimetry Protocols: AAPM TG-51 & IPSM 1990
    Castrillon, S. Vargas
    Cutanda, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [6] Clinical reference dosimetry: Comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols
    Ding, GX
    Cygler, JE
    Kwok, CB
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) : 1217 - 1225
  • [7] Modified calibration protocols in electron beam dosimetry: comparison with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51
    Yulinar, Cica
    Assegab, Muhamad Iqbal
    Wibowo, Wahyu Edy
    Pawiro, Supriyanto Ardjo
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [8] Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: Comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols
    Huq, MS
    Andreo, P
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (01) : 46 - 54
  • [9] Determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams-comparison of the standards DIN 6800-2 (1997), IAEA TRS 398 (2000) and DIN 6800-2 (2006)
    Abu Zakaria, Golam
    Schuette, Wilhelm
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 32 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [10] Gamma Knife Absolute Dose Rate Calibration Using the AAPM TG-51 Protocol and Comparison with the AAPM TG-21 Protocol
    Niemkiewicz, A.
    Niemkiewicz, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) : 2580 - +