Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation: A Powerful Method for Polymer Characterization
    Podzimek, Stepan
    Lebeda, Petr
    Johann, Christoph
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2009, : 62 - 66
  • [42] Semipreparative asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation for nanoparticle characterization
    Bria, Carmen
    Ashames, Akram
    Skelly, Patrick
    Williams, S. Kim
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [43] Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to surface plasmon resonance detection for analysis of therapeutic proteins in blood serum
    Mats Leeman
    Willem M. Albers
    Radoslaw Bombera
    Johana Kuncova-Kallio
    Jussipekka Tuppurainen
    Lars Nilsson
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2021, 413 : 117 - 127
  • [44] Conformational change and aggregation of κ-carrageenan studied by flow field-flow fractionation and multiangle light scattering
    Wittgren, B
    Borgström, J
    Piculell, L
    Wahlund, KG
    BIOPOLYMERS, 1998, 45 (01) : 85 - 96
  • [45] Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to surface plasmon resonance detection for analysis of therapeutic proteins in blood serum
    Leeman, Mats
    Albers, Willem M.
    Bombera, Radoslaw
    Kuncova-Kallio, Johana
    Tuppurainen, Jussipekka
    Nilsson, Lars
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 413 (01) : 117 - 127
  • [46] Vesicle size distributions measured by flow field-flow fractionation coupled with multiangle light scattering
    Korgel, BA
    van Zanten, JH
    Monbouquette, HG
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 74 (06) : 3264 - 3272
  • [47] Characterization of aggregates of surface modified fullerenes by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering detection
    Astefanei, Alina
    Kok, Wim Th.
    Bauerlein, Patrick
    Nunez, Oscar
    Teresa Galceran, Maria
    de Voogt, Pim
    Schoenmakers, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1408 : 197 - 206
  • [48] Monitoring Protein Complexation with Polyphosphazene Polyelectrolyte Using Automated Dynamic Light Scattering Titration and Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation and Protein Recognition Immunoassay
    Lueckheide, Michael
    Marin, Alexander
    Tagad, Harichandra D.
    Posey, Nicholas D.
    Prabhu, Vivek M.
    Andrianov, Alexander K.
    ACS POLYMERS AU, 2023, 3 (05): : 354 - 364
  • [49] The influence of temperature on the characterization of water-soluble polymers using asymmetric flow field-flow-fractionation coupled to multiangle laser light scattering
    Viebke, C
    Williams, PA
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 72 (16) : 3896 - 3901
  • [50] Improved Particle Counting and Size Distribution Determination of Aggregated Virus Populations by Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation and Multiangle Light Scattering Techniques
    McEvoy, Matt
    Razinkov, Vladimir
    Wei, Ziping
    Casas-Finet, Jose R.
    Tous, Guillermo I.
    Schenerman, Mark A.
    BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2011, 27 (02) : 547 - 554