Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterization of cationic polymers by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation and multi-angle light scattering-A comparison with traditional techniques
    Wagner, Michael
    Pietsch, Christian
    Tauhardt, Lutz
    Schallon, Anja
    Schubert, Ulrich S.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2014, 1325 : 195 - 203
  • [32] Capabilities of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation coupled to multi-angle light scattering to detect carbon nanotubes in soot and soil
    Gogos, Alexander
    Kaegi, Ralf
    Zenobi, Renato
    Bucheli, Thomas D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO, 2014, 1 (06) : 584 - 594
  • [33] Amylose and amylopectin in starch by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering and refractive index detection (AF4-MALS-RI)
    Chiaramonte, Eija
    Rhazi, L.
    Aussenac, T.
    White, D. Richard, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE, 2012, 56 (02) : 457 - 463
  • [34] Sub-micron particle analysis by thermal field-flow fractionation and multi-angle light scattering detection
    Mes, EPC
    Kok, WT
    Tijssen, R
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2001, 53 (11-12) : 697 - 703
  • [35] Sub-micron particle analysis by thermal field-flow fractionation and multi-angle light scattering detection
    E. P. C. Mes
    W. Th. Kok
    R. Tijssen
    Chromatographia, 2001, 53 : 697 - 703
  • [36] Gold nanorod separation and characterization by asymmetric-flow field flow fractionation with UV–Vis detection
    Julien Gigault
    Tae Joon Cho
    Robert I. MacCuspie
    Vincent A. Hackley
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2013, 405 : 1191 - 1202
  • [37] Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation: A versatile tool for nanoparticle separation
    Rosu, Cornelia
    Cueto, Rafael
    Reichmanis, Elsa
    Russo, Paul
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [38] Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Analysis of Engineered Nanoparticles in Mouthwashes and Their Interaction with Saliva
    Krystek, Petra
    Spallek, Markus J.
    Klein, Thorsten
    de Boer, Jacob
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 34 (08) : 559 - 563
  • [39] Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Analysis of Engineered, Nanoparticles in Mouthwashes and Their Interaction with Saliva
    Krystek, Petra
    Spallek, Markus J.
    Klein, Thorsten
    de Boer, Jacob
    LC GC EUROPE, 2016, 29 (12) : 660 - +
  • [40] Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation: A Powerful Method for Polymer Characterization
    Podzimek, Stepan
    Lebedat, Petr
    Johann, Christoph
    LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 27 (01) : 62 - +