Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation methods for virus purification
    Eskelin, Katri
    Lampi, Mirka
    Meier, Florian
    Moldenhauer, Evelin
    Bamford, Dennis H.
    Oksanen, Hanna M.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2016, 1469 : 108 - 119
  • [22] Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Investigation of Magnetopolyplexes
    Haladjova, Emi
    Rangelov, Stanislav
    Geisler, Martin
    Boye, Susanne
    Lederer, Albena
    Mountrichas, Grigoris
    Pispas, Stergios
    MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2015, 216 (18) : 1862 - 1867
  • [23] Depolymerization study of sodium hyaluronate by flow field-flow fractionation/multiangle light scattering
    Ji Hye Kwon
    Euijin Hwang
    Il-Hwan Cho
    Myeong Hee Moon
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2009, 395 : 519 - 525
  • [24] Limitations of Nanoparticles Size Characterization by Asymmetric Flow Field-Fractionation Coupled with Online Dynamic Light Scattering
    Giorgi, Francesco
    Curran, Judith M.
    Gilliland, Douglas
    La Spina, Rita
    Whelan, Maurice
    Patterson, Eann A.
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2021, 84 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [25] Depolymerization study of sodium hyaluronate by flow field-flow fractionation/multiangle light scattering
    Kwon, Ji Hye
    Hwang, Euijin
    Cho, Il-Hwan
    Moon, Myeong Hee
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 395 (02) : 519 - 525
  • [26] Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and multiangle light scattering for analysis of gelatin nanoparticle drug carrier systems
    Fraunhofer, W
    Winter, G
    Coester, C
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 76 (07) : 1909 - 1920
  • [27] Characterisation of core-shell latexes by flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering detection
    Frankema, W
    van Bruijnsvoort, M
    Tijssen, R
    Kok, WT
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2002, 943 (02) : 251 - 261
  • [28] Retention behaviour of amylopectins in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation studied by multi-angle light scattering detection
    van Bruijnsvoort, M
    Wahlund, KG
    Nilsson, G
    Kok, WT
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2001, 925 (1-2) : 171 - 182
  • [29] Size fractionation and size characterization of nanoemulsions of lipid droplets and large unilamellar lipid vesicles by asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation/multi-angle light scattering and dynamic light scattering
    Vezocnik, Valerija
    Rebolj, Katja
    Sitar, Simona
    Ota, Katja
    Tusek-Znidaric, Magda
    Strus, Jasna
    Sepcic, Kristina
    Pahovnik, David
    Macek, Peter
    Zagar, Ema
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2015, 1418 : 185 - 191
  • [30] Resonance light scattering (RLS) detection of nanoparticle separations in a microelectrical field-flow fractionation system
    Graff, M
    Frazier, AB
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 5 (01) : 8 - 13