Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation with light scattering detection - an orthogonal sensitivity analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Galyean, Anne A. [1 ,5 ]
Filliben, James J. [2 ]
Holbrook, R. David [3 ]
Vreeland, Wyatt N. [4 ]
Weinberg, Howard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] NIST, Stat Engn Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] NIST, Mat Measurement Sci Div, Nano Res Grp, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[4] NIST, Biomol Measurement Div, 100 Bur Dr, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[5] Colorado Sch Mines, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 1613 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Separation optimization; Light scattering; Nanoparticles; Natural organic matter; Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation; ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; SILVER NANOPARTICLES; ORGANIC-MATTER; OPTIMIZATION; COLLOIDS; SIZE; SAMPLES; SEPARATION; SYSTEMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2016.10.063
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation (AF(4)) has several instrumental factors that may have a direct effect on separation performance. A sensitivity analysis was applied to ascertain the relative importance of AF4 primary instrument factor settings for the separation of a complex environmental sample. The analysis evaluated the impact of instrumental factors namely, cross flow, ramp time, focus flow, injection volume, and run buffer concentration on the multi-angle light scattering measurement of natural organic matter (NOM) molar mass (MM). A 2((5-1)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was used to minimize analysis time while preserving the accuracy and robustness in the determination of the main effects and interactions between any two instrumental factors. By assuming that separations resulting in smaller MM measurements would be more accurate, the analysis produced a ranked list of effects estimates for factors and interactions of factors based on their relative importance in minimizing the MM. The most important and statistically significant AF4 instrumental factors were buffer concentration and cross flow. The least important was ramp time. A parallel 2((5-2)) orthogonal fractional factorial design was also employed on five environmental factors for synthetic natural water samples containing silver nanoparticles (NPs), namely: NP concentration, NP size, NOM concentration, specific conductance, and pH. None of the water quality characteristic effects or interactions were found to be significant in minimizing the measured MM; however, the interaction between NP concentration and NP size was an important effect when considering NOM recovery. This work presents a structured approach for the rigorous assessment of AF4 instrument factors and optimal settings for the separation of complex samples utilizing efficient orthogonal factional factorial design and appropriate graphical analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 132
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation with Multiangle Light Scattering Detection for Characterization of Cellulose Nanocrystals
    Guan, Xia
    Cueto, Rafael
    Russo, Paul
    Qi, Yadong
    Wu, Qinglin
    BIOMACROMOLECULES, 2012, 13 (09) : 2671 - 2679
  • [2] Separation and Characterization of Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) Latex Particles by Asymmetric Flow Field Flow Fractionation with Light-Scattering Detection
    Collins, Melissa E.
    Soto-Cantu, Erick
    Cueto, Rafael
    Russo, Paul S.
    LANGMUIR, 2014, 30 (12) : 3373 - 3380
  • [3] Flow field-flow fractionation with multiangle light scattering detection for the analysis and characterization of functional nanoparticles
    Pierluigi Reschiglian
    Diana C. Rambaldi
    Andrea Zattoni
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2011, 399 : 197 - 203
  • [4] Flow field-flow fractionation with multiangle light scattering detection for the analysis and characterization of functional nanoparticles
    Reschiglian, Pierluigi
    Rambaldi, Diana C.
    Zattoni, Andrea
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 399 (01) : 197 - 203
  • [5] Study of calsequestrin aggregation by flow field-flow fractionation with light scattering detection
    Shadle, Susan E.
    Rostock, Randy
    Bonfrisco, Lou
    Schimpf, Martin E.
    JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, 30 (9-12) : 1513 - 1523
  • [6] Separation and characterization of liposomes using asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with online multi-angle light scattering detection
    Ecija-Arenas, Angela
    Roman-Pizarro, Vanesa
    Manuel Fernandez-Romero, Juan
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2021, 1636
  • [7] Measurement Bias on Nanoparticle Size Characterization by Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Using Dynamic Light-Scattering Detection
    Gigault, Julien
    Mignard, Emmanuel
    El Hadri, Hind
    Grassl, Bruno
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2017, 80 (02) : 287 - 294
  • [8] Measurement Bias on Nanoparticle Size Characterization by Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Using Dynamic Light-Scattering Detection
    Julien Gigault
    Emmanuel Mignard
    Hind El Hadri
    Bruno Grassl
    Chromatographia, 2017, 80 : 287 - 294
  • [9] Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering detection for the analysis of structured nanoparticles
    Zattoni, Andrea
    Rambaldi, Diana Cristina
    Reschiglian, Pierluigi
    Melucci, Manuela
    Krol, Silke
    Coto Garcia, Ana Maria
    Sanz-Medel, Alfredo
    Roessner, Dierk
    Johann, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (52) : 9106 - 9112
  • [10] Force field flow fractionation coupled with light scattering
    Thielking, H
    Adolphi, U
    Kulicke, WM
    NACHRICHTEN AUS CHEMIE TECHNIK UND LABORATORIUM, 1996, 44 (04): : 370 - &