Comparison of IOP Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare Rebound Tonometer, and Tono-Pen in Keratoconus Patients after MyoRing Implantation

被引:4
|
作者
Rateb, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Abdel-Radi, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Eldaly, Zeiad [1 ,2 ]
Elmohamady, Mohamed Nagy [3 ,4 ]
El Din, Asaad Noor [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Tiba Eye Ctr, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Benha Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Banha, Egypt
[4] Masa Eye Ctr, Banha, Egypt
[5] Al Azhar Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2019/1964107
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the different IOP readings by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), ICare rebound tonometer, and Tono-Pen in keratoconus patients after MyoRing implantation. To assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal location (TCL) on IOP measurements by different tonometers. Setting. Prospective observational study was conducted in two private centers in Egypt from February 2015 to November 2016. Methods. Seventeen eyes of 10 patients suffering from keratoconus and who underwent MyoRing implantation were recruited. All subjects underwent GAT, ICare, and Tono-Pen IOP measurements in random order. Central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal location were assessed by Pentacam. Difference in mean in IOP readings was assessed by T-test. Correlation between each pair of devices was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess intertonometer agreement. Results. Seventeen eyes (10 patients) were evaluated. The mean IOP reading was 13.9 +/- 3.68, 12.41 +/- 2.87, and 14.29 +/- 1.31mmHg in GAT, ICare, and Tono-Pen group, respectively. There was a significant difference between IOP readings by GAT/ICare and Tono-Pen/ICare (p value: 0.032 and 0.002, respectively) with no significant difference between GAT/Tono-Pen (p value: 0.554). Mean difference in IOP measurements between GAT/ICare was 1.49 +/- 2.61mmHg, Tono-Pen/ICare was 1.89 +/- 2.15mmHg, and GAT/Tono-Pen was -0.39 +/- 2.59mmHg. There was no significant correlation between the difference in IOP readings among any pair of devices and CCC or TCL. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a reasonable agreement between any pair of tonometers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF THE TONO-PEN TO THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    FRENKEL, REP
    HONG, YJ
    SHIN, DH
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 106 (06) : 750 - 753
  • [2] Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Gao, Feng
    Liu, Hu
    Zhao, Qing
    Pan, Yingzhe
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2017, 13 (05) : 1912 - 1916
  • [3] CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THE OCULAB TONO-PEN TO THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    KAO, SF
    LICHTER, PR
    BERGSTROM, TJ
    ROWE, S
    MUSCH, DC
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1987, 94 (12) : 1541 - 1544
  • [4] Variations of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Tono-Pen, iCare Rebound Tonometer, and Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometer in Patients With Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification
    Kiddee, Weerawat
    Tanjana, Arunee
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2021, 30 (04) : 317 - 324
  • [5] Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range
    Munkwitz, S.
    Elkarmouty, A.
    Hoffmann, E. M.
    Pfeiffer, N.
    Thieme, H.
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 246 (06) : 875 - 879
  • [6] Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range
    S. Munkwitz
    A. Elkarmouty
    E. M. Hoffmann
    N. Pfeiffer
    H. Thieme
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2008, 246 : 875 - 879
  • [7] TONO-PEN, A NEW HAND-HELD TONOMETER - COMPARISON WITH THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    HESSEMER, V
    ROSSLER, R
    JACOBI, KW
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1988, 193 (04) : 420 - 426
  • [8] CLINICAL COMPARISON OF THE PROTON AND TONO-PEN TONOMETERS WITH THE GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    MIDELFART, A
    WIGERS, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 78 (12) : 895 - 898
  • [9] Comparison of disposable Goldmann applanation tonometer and ICare ic100 to standards of care Goldmann nondisposable applanation tonometer and Tono-pen XL for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
    Wong, Benny
    Parikh, Deep
    Angert, Mallorie
    Gorski, Matthew
    Shih, Carolyn
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [10] Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer by experienced and inexperienced tonometrists
    L M Abraham
    N C R Epasinghe
    D Selva
    R Casson
    Eye, 2008, 22 : 503 - 506