Comparison of IOP Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare Rebound Tonometer, and Tono-Pen in Keratoconus Patients after MyoRing Implantation

被引:4
|
作者
Rateb, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Abdel-Radi, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Eldaly, Zeiad [1 ,2 ]
Elmohamady, Mohamed Nagy [3 ,4 ]
El Din, Asaad Noor [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Tiba Eye Ctr, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Benha Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Banha, Egypt
[4] Masa Eye Ctr, Banha, Egypt
[5] Al Azhar Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2019/1964107
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the different IOP readings by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), ICare rebound tonometer, and Tono-Pen in keratoconus patients after MyoRing implantation. To assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal location (TCL) on IOP measurements by different tonometers. Setting. Prospective observational study was conducted in two private centers in Egypt from February 2015 to November 2016. Methods. Seventeen eyes of 10 patients suffering from keratoconus and who underwent MyoRing implantation were recruited. All subjects underwent GAT, ICare, and Tono-Pen IOP measurements in random order. Central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal location were assessed by Pentacam. Difference in mean in IOP readings was assessed by T-test. Correlation between each pair of devices was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess intertonometer agreement. Results. Seventeen eyes (10 patients) were evaluated. The mean IOP reading was 13.9 +/- 3.68, 12.41 +/- 2.87, and 14.29 +/- 1.31mmHg in GAT, ICare, and Tono-Pen group, respectively. There was a significant difference between IOP readings by GAT/ICare and Tono-Pen/ICare (p value: 0.032 and 0.002, respectively) with no significant difference between GAT/Tono-Pen (p value: 0.554). Mean difference in IOP measurements between GAT/ICare was 1.49 +/- 2.61mmHg, Tono-Pen/ICare was 1.89 +/- 2.15mmHg, and GAT/Tono-Pen was -0.39 +/- 2.59mmHg. There was no significant correlation between the difference in IOP readings among any pair of devices and CCC or TCL. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a reasonable agreement between any pair of tonometers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients
    Valero, B.
    Fenolland, J. -R.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Sendon, D.
    Mesnard, C.
    Sigaux, M.
    Giraud, J. -M.
    Renard, J. -P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2017, 40 (10): : 865 - 875
  • [22] Comparison of Rebound Tonometer Icare-Pro and Goldmann Handheld Applanation Tonometer in Congenital Glaucoma
    Morales-Fernandez, Laura
    Borrego, Lara
    Martinez de la Casa, Jose
    Saenz-Frances, Federico
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [23] Comparison of the Tono-Pen and Goldmann tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma
    Horowitz, GS
    Byles, J
    Lee, JL
    D'Este, C
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 32 (06): : 584 - 589
  • [24] Measurement of intraocular pressure in clinically normal Turkish Shepherd Dogs with the rebound tonometer (TonoVet®) and the applanation tonometer (Tono-Pen Vet®)
    Kulualp, Kadri
    Yurdakul, Ibrahim
    Erol, Hanifi
    Atalan, Gultekin
    Kilic, Servet
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2018, 74 (09): : 568 - 573
  • [25] Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
    Yilmaz, Ihsan
    Altan, Cigdem
    Aygit, Ebru Demet
    Alagoz, Cengiz
    Baz, Okkes
    Ahmet, Sibel
    Urvasizoglu, Semih
    Yasa, Dilek
    Demirok, Ahmet
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 8 : 1069 - 1073
  • [26] Comparison of the ICare® rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population
    Fernandes, P
    Díaz-Rey, JA
    Queirós, A
    Gonzalez-Meijome, JM
    Jorge, J
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (05) : 436 - 440
  • [27] Clinical comparison of the TonoVet® rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet® applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology
    von Spiessen, Lena
    Karck, Julia
    Rohn, Karl
    Meyer-Lindenberg, Andrea
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 18 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [28] INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY - MINIFIED GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER, PNEUMATONOMETER, AND TONO-PEN VERSUS MANOMETRY
    MENAGE, MJ
    KAUFMAN, PL
    CROFT, MA
    LANDAY, SP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 78 (09) : 671 - 676
  • [29] Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen
    Bhan, A
    Browning, AC
    Shah, S
    Hamilton, R
    Dave, D
    Dua, HS
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (05) : 1389 - 1392
  • [30] Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Pakrou, Nima
    Gray, Tim
    Mills, Richard
    Landers, John
    Craig, Jamie
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (01) : 43 - 47