Comparison of IOP Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, ICare Rebound Tonometer, and Tono-Pen in Keratoconus Patients after MyoRing Implantation

被引:4
|
作者
Rateb, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Abdel-Radi, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Eldaly, Zeiad [1 ,2 ]
Elmohamady, Mohamed Nagy [3 ,4 ]
El Din, Asaad Noor [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Tiba Eye Ctr, Assiut, Egypt
[3] Benha Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Banha, Egypt
[4] Masa Eye Ctr, Banha, Egypt
[5] Al Azhar Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2019/1964107
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To evaluate the different IOP readings by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), ICare rebound tonometer, and Tono-Pen in keratoconus patients after MyoRing implantation. To assess the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal location (TCL) on IOP measurements by different tonometers. Setting. Prospective observational study was conducted in two private centers in Egypt from February 2015 to November 2016. Methods. Seventeen eyes of 10 patients suffering from keratoconus and who underwent MyoRing implantation were recruited. All subjects underwent GAT, ICare, and Tono-Pen IOP measurements in random order. Central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal location were assessed by Pentacam. Difference in mean in IOP readings was assessed by T-test. Correlation between each pair of devices was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess intertonometer agreement. Results. Seventeen eyes (10 patients) were evaluated. The mean IOP reading was 13.9 +/- 3.68, 12.41 +/- 2.87, and 14.29 +/- 1.31mmHg in GAT, ICare, and Tono-Pen group, respectively. There was a significant difference between IOP readings by GAT/ICare and Tono-Pen/ICare (p value: 0.032 and 0.002, respectively) with no significant difference between GAT/Tono-Pen (p value: 0.554). Mean difference in IOP measurements between GAT/ICare was 1.49 +/- 2.61mmHg, Tono-Pen/ICare was 1.89 +/- 2.15mmHg, and GAT/Tono-Pen was -0.39 +/- 2.59mmHg. There was no significant correlation between the difference in IOP readings among any pair of devices and CCC or TCL. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a reasonable agreement between any pair of tonometers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare®) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL®) in normotensive dogs
    Leiva, M
    Naranjo, C
    Peña, MT
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 9 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [42] Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening
    Ting, Siew Leng
    Lim, Lik Thai
    Ooi, Chor Yau
    Rahman, Md Mizanur
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 8 (03): : 229 - 232
  • [43] Comparison of the Icare Tonometer and the Hand-held Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Pediatric Aphakia
    Li, Yunping
    Tang, Luosheng
    Xiao, Manyi
    Jia, Songbai
    Liu, Ping
    Zhou, Yi
    Chen, Huihui
    Zeng, Jiexi
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (07) : 550 - 554
  • [44] Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma
    Vandewalle, Evelien
    Vandenbroeck, Sofie
    Stalmans, Ingeborg
    Zeyen, Thierry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 19 (05) : 783 - 789
  • [45] Rebound tonometry by iCare 200 (IC200): comparison with Tono-Pen in the operating room and Goldmann applanation in the clinic
    Umfress, Allison C.
    Glaser, Tanya S.
    Ploysangam, Pimpiroon
    Freedman, Sharon F.
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2021, 25 (06):
  • [46] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility With the Portable ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients
    Salim, Sarwat
    Du, Haiming
    Wan, Jim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (04) : 325 - 329
  • [47] Clinical comparison of the measurement of the IOP with the ocular blood flow tonometer, the Tonopen XL and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Bafa, M
    Lambrinakis, I
    Dayan, M
    Birch, M
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 79 (01): : 15 - 18
  • [48] Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Perkins applanation tonometer in children under general anesthesia
    Chagny, M.
    Stolowy, N.
    Denis, D.
    Sauvan, L.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2023, 46 (09): : 1005 - 1012
  • [49] Evaluation of the applanation tonometer Tono-Pen Avia® Vet™ for the measurement of the canine and feline intraocular pressure
    Helbig, Stefanie
    Eule, J. Corinna
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE KLEINTIERE HEIMTIERE, 2021, 49 (02): : 86 - 92
  • [50] Evaluation of agreement of IOP measurements by Tono-Vera tonometer to Goldmann applanation tonometry
    Niles, Charles R.
    Crinzi, Alexander R.
    Bonaventura, Russell
    Taylor, David A.
    FRONTIERS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 4