Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Building Components towards NZEBs

被引:5
|
作者
Antypa, Despoina [1 ]
Petrakli, Foteini [1 ]
Gkika, Anastasia [1 ]
Voigt, Pamela [2 ]
Kahnt, Alexander [2 ]
Boehm, Robert [2 ]
Suchorzewski, Jan [3 ]
Araujo, Andreia [4 ,5 ]
Sousa, Susana [4 ,5 ]
Koumoulos, Elias P. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRES Innovat Res & Engn Solut, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, B-1780 Wemmel, Belgium
[2] Leipzig Univ Appl Sci HTWK Leipzig, Inst Concrete Construction, Fac Civil Engn, PF 30 11 66, D-04251 Leipzig, Germany
[3] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Brinellgatan 4, S-50115 Boras, Sweden
[4] INEGI Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn, Campus FEUP,R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[5] LAETA Associated Lab Energy Transports & Aeronaut, Campus FEUP,R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; sustainability; building components; thermal insulation; NZEB; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/su142316218
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The building sector accounts for 40% of the total energy consumed in Europe at annual basis, together with the relevant Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. In order to mitigate these impacts, the concept and establishment of the Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) is under continuous and intensive research. In fact, as the energy used for buildings' operation becomes more efficient, impacts resulting from the buildings' embodied energy become of more importance. Therefore, the selection of building materials and components is of high significance, as these affect the energy performance and potential environmental impacts of the building envelopes. The objective of this study is to perform a preliminary Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on advanced multifunctional building components, aiming to achieve lower embodied emissions in NZEBs. The advanced components analyzed are composite panels for facade elements of building envelopes, providing thermal efficiency. The design of sustainable building envelope systems is expected to upgrade the overall environmental performance of buildings, including the NZEBs. The findings of this study constitute unambiguous evidence on the need for further research on this topic, as substantial lack of data concerning embodied impacts is presented in literature, adding to the growing discussion on NZEBs at a whole life cycle perspective across Europe. This research has shown that the electricity required from the manufacturing phase of the examined building components is the main contributor to climate change impact and the other environmental categories assessed. Sensitivity analysis that has been performed indicated that the climate change impact is highly depended on the electricity grid energy mix across Europe. Taking into account the current green energy transition by the increase of the renewable energy sources in electricity production, as well as the future upgrade of the manufacturing processes, it is expected that this climate change impact will be mitigated. Finally, the comparison between the CLC thermal insulator and other foam concretes in literature showed that the materials of the building components examined do not present any diversions in terms of environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental life cycle assessment of building materials in the Netherlands
    SchuurmansStehmann, AM
    Bijen, JMJM
    EUROMAT 97 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MATERIALS AND PROCESSES AND APPLICATIONS: MATERIALS, FUNCTIONALITY & DESIGN, VOL 4: CHARACTERIZATION AND PRODUCTION/DESIGN, 1997, : 361 - 365
  • [42] Analysis on Concept of Green Building Life Cycle Assessment
    Yang Caixia
    Yin Bo
    Han Miao
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CONSTRUCTION ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT (ISCEM2010), 2010, : 134 - 137
  • [43] Dealing with uncertainties in comparative building life cycle assessment
    Pannier, Marie-Lise
    Schalbart, Patrick
    Peuportier, Bruno
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 242
  • [44] Life Cycle Ecological Footprint Assessment of an Academic Building
    Husain D.
    Prakash R.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2019, 100 (01) : 97 - 110
  • [45] Life-Cycle Assessment of Building Renovation in Latvia
    Borodinecs, Anatolijs
    Geikins, Aleksandrs
    Zemitis, Jurgis
    2018 ASHRAE WINTER CONFERENCE, 2018,
  • [46] Comprehensive Life-cycle Assessment of SIP Building
    Du, Qiang
    Zhang, Huanfang
    Liu, Nan
    Yin, Xusheng
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-4, 2013, 353-356 : 2808 - +
  • [47] Towards a comprehensive life cycle approach of building automation systems
    Lehmann, Matthias
    Andreas, Joerg
    Tuan Linh Mai
    Kabitzsch, Klaus
    2017 IEEE 26TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS (ISIE), 2017, : 1541 - 1547
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building
    Vitale, Pierluca
    Arena, Noemi
    Di Gregorio, Fabrizio
    Arena, Umberto
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 : 311 - 321
  • [49] Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: A case study on building assessment
    Takano, Atsushi
    Winter, Stefan
    Hughes, Mark
    Linkosalmi, Lauri
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 79 : 20 - 30
  • [50] Life-cycle assessment of historical building reuse: Is the existing building the greenest building?
    Hu, Ming
    ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH ADDRESSING SOCIETAL CHALLENGES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 217 - 222