Life Cycle Ecological Footprint Assessment of an Academic Building

被引:16
|
作者
Husain D. [1 ]
Prakash R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Allahabad
关键词
Academic building; Ecological Footprint; Embodied emission; Energy analysis; Life cycle assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s40030-018-0334-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Buildings are responsible for significant natural resource consumption, waste generation and environmental pollution. Building impacts are generally assessed through life cycle analysis (LCA). This study integrates LCA with the Ecological Footprint indicator for the assessment of a building’s impact on the planet. In order to determine ecological impact of a building, a methodology has been established for the estimation of life cycle ecological footprint (LCEF total ) of the building, as well as to assess its impact due to resource consumption (energy, water, building materials, manpower, etc.) and waste assimilation over the life cycle. For an academic building located in India taken as a case study, the LCEF total is found to be 4426.47 gha and the LCEF total per unit floor area is 0.6 gha/m 2 . The average annual Ecological Footprint (EF avg ) of the academic building has been estimated as 73.77 gha/year, that is, approximately 101 times more than the built-up land of the academic building. For the academic year of 2015–2016, the average annual Ecological Footprint per student (EF avg/student ) of the academic building is 0.05 gha/student-year. If annual grid electricity consumption of the building is replaced by the grid-connected rooftop photovoltaic system in the ratios of 100%, 75%, 50% and 25%, it can be reduced up to 61%, 46%, 31% and 15% of the total LCEF total of the academic building, respectively. © 2018, The Institution of Engineers (India).
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 110
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Ecological Footprint Reduction for a Tropical Building
    Husain, Dilawar
    Prakash, Ravi
    Ahmad, Akbar
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [2] Ecological footprint accounting in the life cycle assessment of products
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Frischknecht, Rolf
    Hungerbuehler, Konrad
    Hendriks, A. Jan
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 64 (04) : 798 - 807
  • [3] Ecological Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment in the sustainability assessment of tourism activities
    Castellani, Valentina
    Sala, Serenella
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 16 : 135 - 147
  • [4] Life cycle ecological footprint of building: a case study of low-rise tropical residential building
    Ansari, Y.
    Husain, D.
    Haadi, S. M.
    Haloi, J.
    Prakash, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (09) : 9779 - 9794
  • [5] Life cycle ecological footprint of building: a case study of low-rise tropical residential building
    Y. Ansari
    D. Husain
    S. M. Haadi
    J. Haloi
    R. Prakash
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 9779 - 9794
  • [6] Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model
    Mengyang He
    Yang Wang
    Haotian Ma
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [7] Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model
    He, Mengyang
    Wang, Yang
    Ma, Haotian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Carbon footprint - A catalyst for life cycle assessment?
    Weidema, Bo P.
    Thrane, Mikkel
    Christensen, Per
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Lokke, Soren
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 12 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [9] Use of Life Cycle Assessment methodology in the analysis of Ecological Footprint Assessment results to evaluate the environmental performance of universities
    Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, Vanesa G.
    Ignacio Torregrosa-Lopez, Juan
    Capuz-Rizo, Salvador F.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 133 : 43 - 53
  • [10] Building-integrated solar thermal system with/without phase change material: Life cycle assessment based on ReCiPe, USEtox and Ecological footprint
    Lamnatou, Chr.
    Motte, F.
    Notton, G.
    Chemisana, D.
    Cristofari, C.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 193 : 672 - 683