Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Building Components towards NZEBs

被引:5
|
作者
Antypa, Despoina [1 ]
Petrakli, Foteini [1 ]
Gkika, Anastasia [1 ]
Voigt, Pamela [2 ]
Kahnt, Alexander [2 ]
Boehm, Robert [2 ]
Suchorzewski, Jan [3 ]
Araujo, Andreia [4 ,5 ]
Sousa, Susana [4 ,5 ]
Koumoulos, Elias P. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRES Innovat Res & Engn Solut, Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, B-1780 Wemmel, Belgium
[2] Leipzig Univ Appl Sci HTWK Leipzig, Inst Concrete Construction, Fac Civil Engn, PF 30 11 66, D-04251 Leipzig, Germany
[3] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Brinellgatan 4, S-50115 Boras, Sweden
[4] INEGI Inst Sci & Innovat Mech & Ind Engn, Campus FEUP,R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
[5] LAETA Associated Lab Energy Transports & Aeronaut, Campus FEUP,R Dr Roberto Frias 400, P-4200465 Porto, Portugal
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; sustainability; building components; thermal insulation; NZEB; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/su142316218
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The building sector accounts for 40% of the total energy consumed in Europe at annual basis, together with the relevant Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. In order to mitigate these impacts, the concept and establishment of the Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) is under continuous and intensive research. In fact, as the energy used for buildings' operation becomes more efficient, impacts resulting from the buildings' embodied energy become of more importance. Therefore, the selection of building materials and components is of high significance, as these affect the energy performance and potential environmental impacts of the building envelopes. The objective of this study is to perform a preliminary Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) on advanced multifunctional building components, aiming to achieve lower embodied emissions in NZEBs. The advanced components analyzed are composite panels for facade elements of building envelopes, providing thermal efficiency. The design of sustainable building envelope systems is expected to upgrade the overall environmental performance of buildings, including the NZEBs. The findings of this study constitute unambiguous evidence on the need for further research on this topic, as substantial lack of data concerning embodied impacts is presented in literature, adding to the growing discussion on NZEBs at a whole life cycle perspective across Europe. This research has shown that the electricity required from the manufacturing phase of the examined building components is the main contributor to climate change impact and the other environmental categories assessed. Sensitivity analysis that has been performed indicated that the climate change impact is highly depended on the electricity grid energy mix across Europe. Taking into account the current green energy transition by the increase of the renewable energy sources in electricity production, as well as the future upgrade of the manufacturing processes, it is expected that this climate change impact will be mitigated. Finally, the comparison between the CLC thermal insulator and other foam concretes in literature showed that the materials of the building components examined do not present any diversions in terms of environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Towards Anticipatory Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaics
    Dwarakanath, T. R.
    Wender, Benjamin A.
    Seager, Thomas
    Fraser, Matthew P.
    2013 IEEE 39TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2013, : 2392 - 2393
  • [22] Geotraceability and life cycle assessment in environmental life cycle management: towards sustainability
    Ometto, Aldo
    Batistella, Mateus
    Guelere Filho, Americo
    Chuzel, Gerard
    Viau, Alain
    COMPLEX SYSTEMS CONCURRENT ENGINEERING: COLLABORATION, TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2007, : 673 - +
  • [23] Parameters related to building components' life-cycle analysis in methods for buildings' environmental performance assessment
    Bitsiou, E.
    Giarma, C.
    SUSTAINABILITY IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION (SBE19), 2020, 410
  • [24] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of multistorey building: Attributional and consequential perspectives
    Fauzi, Rizal Taufiq
    Lavoie, Patrick
    Tanguy, Audrey
    Amor, Ben
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 197
  • [25] Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a framework for impact assessment
    Crenna, Eleonora
    Sala, Serenella
    Polce, Chiara
    Collina, Elena
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 525 - 536
  • [26] Modular methodology for building life cycle assessment for a building stock model
    Szalay, Zs.
    Kiss, B.
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED VISION, 2019, : 855 - 861
  • [27] Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment
    Hugo Henrique de Simone Souza
    Patrícia Pereira de Abreu Evangelista
    Diego Lima Medeiros
    Jaume Albertí
    Pere Fullana-i-Palmer
    Marc Árpád Boncz
    Asher Kiperstok
    Jardel Pereira Gonçalves
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 435 - 454
  • [28] Life cycle environmental assessment of temporary building constructions
    Grosso, Mario
    Thiebat, Francesca
    6TH INTERNATIONAL BUILDING PHYSICS CONFERENCE (IBPC 2015), 2015, 78 : 3180 - 3185
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of dynamic building integrated photovoltaics
    Jayathissa, P.
    Jansen, M.
    Heeren, N.
    Nagy, Z.
    Schlueter, A.
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 156 : 75 - 82
  • [30] Dynamic life cycle assessment modelling of a NZEB building
    Asdrubali, F.
    Baggio, P.
    Prada, A.
    Grazieschi, G.
    Guattari, C.
    ENERGY, 2020, 191