μ Tools for flight control robustness assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Döll, C
Ferreres, G
Magni, JF
机构
[1] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, DCT DCSD, Syst Control & Flight Dynam Dept, F-31055 Toulouse 04, France
[2] SUPAERO Ecole Natl Super Aeronaut Espace, F-31055 Toulouse 04, France
关键词
robustness; mu framework; flexible structures; phase and delay margins; non-linear analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S1270-9638(99)80041-8
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to emphasize the usefulness of the CL framework for the analysis of the robustness properties of flight control systems. Model uncertainties may correspond, either to parametric uncertainties (e.g. in the aerodynamic model or in the value of the trim point) or to neglected high frequency dynamics (e.g. in the actuators or sensors). We especially show that several classical problems (computation of a phase or delay margin, non-linear analysis of a PIO effect, computation of a frequency domain overshoot) can be extended to an uncertain aircraft model. A flexible model of the aircraft can, moreover, be taken into account. (C) Elsevier, Paris.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 189
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimization design and robustness analysis of decentralized control for integrated flight/propulsion systems
    Dai, Ji-Yang
    Huang, Ying
    Peng, Chen
    Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/Journal of Aerospace Power, 2013, 28 (01): : 233 - 240
  • [32] Design and robustness analysis of gain-scheduled control system for parabolic flight
    Univ of Naples 'Federico II', Napoli, Italy
    J Guid Control Dyn, 2 (430-437):
  • [33] FLIGHT CONTROL APPLICATION OF NEW STABILITY ROBUSTNESS BOUNDS FOR LINEAR UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS
    YEDAVALLI, RK
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1993, 16 (06) : 1032 - 1037
  • [34] In-Flight Test Campaign to Validate PIO Detection and Assessment Tools
    Jones, Michael
    Alexander, Marc
    Hoefinger, Marc
    Barnett, Miles
    Comeau, Perry
    Gubbels, Arthur
    AEROSPACE, 2020, 7 (09)
  • [35] Assessment criteria as specifications for reconfiguring flight control
    Lombaerts T.
    Joosten D.
    Smaili H.
    Breeman J.
    Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 2013, 399 : 223 - 243
  • [36] Environmental assessment of entropy control in flight process
    Sogut, Mehmet Ziya
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 93 (08): : 1358 - 1366
  • [37] LPV Control Design for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Using Robustness Analysis Tools
    Muniraj, Devaprakash
    Fry, J. Micah
    Farhood, Mazen
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (21): : 236 - 241
  • [38] Improving the robustness of a parallel robot using predictive functional control (PFC) tools
    Maalouf, Aline I.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 45TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-14, 2006, : 6468 - 6473
  • [39] Simulation for Measuring the Effect of Flight Retiming to the Robustness of Flight Schedule
    Novianingsih, K.
    Hadianti, R.
    Uttunggadewa, S.
    Soewono, E.
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES (ICMNS 2012)L: SCIENCE FOR HEALTH, FOOD AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 1589 : 448 - 451
  • [40] A hybrid approach to robustness analyses of flight control laws in re-entry applications
    Tancredi, Urbano
    Grassi, Michele
    Corraro, Federico
    Filippone, Edoardo
    Verde, Leopoldo
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2010, 66 (9-10) : 1388 - 1398