μ Tools for flight control robustness assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Döll, C
Ferreres, G
Magni, JF
机构
[1] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, DCT DCSD, Syst Control & Flight Dynam Dept, F-31055 Toulouse 04, France
[2] SUPAERO Ecole Natl Super Aeronaut Espace, F-31055 Toulouse 04, France
关键词
robustness; mu framework; flexible structures; phase and delay margins; non-linear analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S1270-9638(99)80041-8
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to emphasize the usefulness of the CL framework for the analysis of the robustness properties of flight control systems. Model uncertainties may correspond, either to parametric uncertainties (e.g. in the aerodynamic model or in the value of the trim point) or to neglected high frequency dynamics (e.g. in the actuators or sensors). We especially show that several classical problems (computation of a phase or delay margin, non-linear analysis of a PIO effect, computation of a frequency domain overshoot) can be extended to an uncertain aircraft model. A flexible model of the aircraft can, moreover, be taken into account. (C) Elsevier, Paris.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 189
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improved computation of mixed μ bounds for flight control law robustness analysis
    Bates, D. G.
    Mannchen, T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART I-JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2004, 218 (I8) : 609 - 619
  • [22] ROBAN: A parameter robustness analysis tool and its flight control applications
    Amato, F
    Verde, L
    ROBUST CONTROL DESIGN 2000, VOLS 1 & 2, 2000, 1-2 : 561 - 566
  • [23] Assessment of the robustness of gas turbine diagnostics tools based on neural networks
    Bettocchi, R.
    Pinelli, M.
    Spina, P. R.
    Venturini, M.
    Zanetta, G. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2006, VOL 4, 2006, : 603 - 613
  • [24] On Robustness of EDA Tools
    Schmidt, Jan
    Fiser, Petr
    Balcarek, Jiri
    2014 17TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL SYSTEM DESIGN (DSD), 2014, : 427 - 434
  • [25] Flight control systems using passivity-based control: Disturbance rejection and robustness analysis
    Akmeliawati, R
    Mareels, I
    AIAA GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3: A COLLECTION OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 1999, : 1190 - 1198
  • [26] A method of fault diagnosis and flight envelop assessment for flight control systems
    Liu Xiaoxiong
    Chen Kang
    Qiu Yueheng
    Sun Liyuan
    CEIS 2011, 2011, 15
  • [27] Robustness Analysis for Rotorcraft Pilot Coupling with Helicopter Flight Control System in Loop
    Chen Junfeng
    Li Wuzhou
    Suo Wenchao
    Wang Zegang
    Xu Penghui
    Wang Weilong
    2017 IEEE 2ND ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IAEAC), 2017, : 68 - 72
  • [28] Robustness Analysis of Unmanned Helicopter Flight Control Law Using μ-Analysis Techniques
    Tang, Jie
    Wei, Chen
    Meng, Wenyue
    2011 6TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA), 2011, : 1283 - 1287
  • [29] Design and robustness analysis of gain-scheduled control system for parabolic flight
    Amato, F
    Ambrosino, G
    Mattei, M
    Verde, L
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1996, 19 (02) : 430 - 437
  • [30] Robustness analysis of an integrated flight and propulsion control system using μ and the ν-gap metric
    Gatley, SL
    Bates, DG
    Hayes, MJ
    Postlethwaite, I
    CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2002, 10 (03) : 261 - 275