Assessment criteria as specifications for reconfiguring flight control

被引:0
|
作者
Lombaerts T. [1 ]
Joosten D. [2 ]
Smaili H. [3 ]
Breeman J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629 HS
[2] Delft Center of Systems and Control, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2628 CD
[3] National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam 1059 CM
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-642-11690-2_7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To obtain a quantitative measure of predicted FTFC system performance in degraded modes, specifications need to be defined to assess proper functioning under realistic operational flight conditions. The goal of the benchmark specifications modelling, as described in this chapter, is to create a set of assessment criteria in order to evaluate the quality of the performance of fault detection and identification (FDI) and reconfigurable control algorithms. The lay-out of this chapter is as follows. First, the specifications modelling process is introduced by discussing the benchmark scenario. Subsequently, the general evaluation criteria will be considered by defining two classes of test manoeuvres. Thereafter, focus is placed on the test manoeuvres for FTFC qualification, which is the major topic of this chapter. After the discussion on how the assessment quantities of interest can be divided into two categories, four qualification test manoeuvres are discussed in depth. These include straight flight, right turn and localizer intercept, glideslope intercept and final approach with sidestep. Finally, a summary of the specified assessment quantities is given for the different FTFC qualification test manoeuvres. These criteria have also been published in Ref. [3]. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 243
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INTEGRATED FLIGHT/PROPULSION CONTROL - SUBSYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS
    ROCK, SM
    EMAMINAEINI, A
    NEIGHBORS, K
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1994, 17 (01) : 201 - 208
  • [2] Nonlinear Reconfiguring Flight Control Based on Online Physical Model Identification
    Lombaerts, T. J. J.
    Huisman, H. O.
    Chu, Q. P.
    Mulder, J. A.
    Joosten, D. A.
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2009, 32 (03) : 727 - 748
  • [3] INTEGRATED FLIGHT PROPULSION CONTROL - SUBSYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERFORMANCE
    NEIGHBORS, WK
    ROCK, SM
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1995, 18 (03) : 572 - 578
  • [4] SPECIFICATIONS AND CRITERIA FOR QUALITY-CONTROL OF LABELED CHEMICALS
    HARRIS, WG
    BAROOSHI.AV
    JOURNAL OF LABELLED COMPOUNDS, 1973, 9 (04): : 743 - 754
  • [5] CRITERIA FOR CONTAMINATION LEVEL IN FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS
    SCHMITT, VR
    SAE TRANSACTIONS, 1968, 77 : 93 - &
  • [6] Lab criteria and specifications
    不详
    R&D MAGAZINE, 2006, 48 (05): : F14 - F16
  • [7] Large envelope flight control satisfying H∞ robustness and performance specifications
    Blue, P
    Güvenc, L
    Odenthal, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2001, : 1351 - 1356
  • [8] Developing Assessment Criteria for State DOTs' Standard Specifications on Contractor Schedules
    Han, Byung Gi
    Son, Junghye
    Khwaj, Nabeel
    O'Brien, William J.
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2022: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY, CONTRACTS, AND DESIGN AND MATERIALS, 2022, : 403 - 413
  • [9] μ Tools for flight control robustness assessment
    Döll, C
    Ferreres, G
    Magni, JF
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 3 (03) : 177 - 189
  • [10] DESIGN OF FLIGHT CONTROL-SYSTEMS TO MEET ROTORCRAFT HANDLING QUALITIES SPECIFICATIONS
    LOW, E
    GARRARD, WL
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1993, 16 (01) : 69 - 78