Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:29
|
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Community sensitization and decision-making for trial participation: A mixed-methods study from The Gambia
    Dierickx, Susan
    O'Neill, Sarah
    Gryseels, Charlotte
    Anyango, Edna Immaculate
    Bannister-Tyrrell, Melanie
    Okebe, Joseph
    Mwesigwa, Julia
    Jaiteh, Fatou
    Gerrets, Rene
    Ravinetto, Raffaella
    D'Alessandro, Umberto
    Grietens, Koen Peeters
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (04) : 406 - 419
  • [42] The ambiguity of goal-setting: a study of patients' perspectives on goal-setting in outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury
    Ortenblad, Lisbeth
    Maribo, Thomas
    Quistgaard, Britta
    Madsen, Ellen
    Handberg, Charlotte
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 45 (20) : 3342 - 3351
  • [43] Ambivalent effects of goal-setting for strategic decision making under risk
    Schiebener, Johannes
    Wegmann, Elisa
    Pawlikowski, Mirko
    Brand, Matthias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 122 - 122
  • [44] Senior Student Goal Setting During Subinternship: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Stallworth, Leila E.
    Palladino, Christie
    Leggio, Lisa E.
    Hudson, Valera L.
    Elam, Rachel E.
    Richardson, Deborah S.
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2014, 26 (03) : 225 - 229
  • [45] A Model of Shared Decision-making in Medical Rehabilitation
    Koerner, M.
    REHABILITATION, 2009, 48 (03) : 160 - 165
  • [46] Shared decision-making for psychiatric medication: A mixed-methods evaluation of a UK training programme for service users and clinicians
    Ramon, Shulamit
    Morant, Nicola
    Stead, Ute
    Perry, Ben
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 63 (08) : 763 - 772
  • [47] Facilitators and Barriers for Physiotherapists to Engage in Goal-Setting With Patients During Their Hospital Stay-An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study
    Baumbach, Linda
    Feddern, Wiebke
    Grube, Friederike
    Koenig, Hans-Helmut
    Hajek, Andre
    Klotz, Susanne G. R.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 30 (01)
  • [48] Shared decision-making in neonatology: an utopia or an attainable goal?
    D'Aloja, Ernesto
    Floris, Laura
    Muller, Mima
    Birocchi, Francesca
    Fanos, Vassilios
    Paribello, Francesco
    Demontis, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2010, 23 : 56 - 58
  • [49] THE POTENTIAL FOR SHARED DECISION-MAKING AND DECISION AIDS IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE
    van Til, Janine A.
    Drossaert, Constance H. C.
    Punter, R. Annemiek
    Ijzerman, Maarten J.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (06) : 598 - 604
  • [50] Principles of shared decision-making within teams
    Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
    Wernovsky, Gil
    Cooper, David S.
    Karl, Tom R.
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2015, 25 (08) : 1631 - 1636