Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:29
|
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interactive Decision-Making in Entertainment Movies: A Mixed-Methods Approach
    Rieger, Diana
    Wulf, Tim
    Riesmeyer, Claudia
    Ruf, Larissa
    PSYCHOLOGY OF POPULAR MEDIA, 2023, 12 (03) : 294 - 302
  • [32] Decision-making and goal-setting in chronic disease management: Baseline findings of a randomized controlled trial
    Kangovi, Shreya
    Mitra, Nandita
    Smith, Robyn A.
    Kulkarni, Raina
    Turr, Lindsey
    Huo, Hairong
    Glanz, Karen
    Grande, David
    Long, Judith A.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (03) : 449 - 455
  • [33] Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
    Misra, Anjali J.
    Ong, Shawn Y.
    Gokhale, Arjun
    Khan, Sameer
    Melnick, Edward R.
    JAMIA OPEN, 2019, 2 (04) : 447 - 455
  • [34] GOAL-SETTING AND THE DIFFERENTIAL INFLUENCE OF SELF-REGULATORY PROCESSES ON COMPLEX DECISION-MAKING PERFORMANCE
    CERVONE, D
    JIWANI, N
    WOOD, R
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [35] Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
    Liu, Yan-Qiu
    Guo, Yu-Lin
    Xu, Jia
    Geng, Wen-Jing
    Li, Zhen-Zhen
    Jia, Ming
    Liu, Yu-Dan
    Zhao, Hua
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 249 - 257
  • [36] Toward Shared Decision-Making in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study
    Sangeorzan, Irina
    Antonacci, Grazia
    Martin, Anne
    Grodzinski, Ben
    Zipser, Carl M.
    Murphy, Rory K. J.
    Andriopoulou, Panoraia
    Cook, Chad E.
    Anderson, David B.
    Guest, James
    Furlan, Julio C.
    Kotter, Mark R. N.
    Boerger, Timothy F.
    Sadler, Iwan
    Roberts, Elizabeth A.
    Wood, Helen
    Fraser, Christine
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    Kumar, Vishal
    Jung, Josephine
    Milligan, James
    Nouri, Aria
    Martin, Allan R.
    Blizzard, Tammy
    Vialle, Luiz Roberto
    Tetreault, Lindsay
    Kalsi-Ryan, Sukhvinder
    Macdowall, Anna
    Martin-Moore, Esther
    Burwood, Martin
    Wood, Lianne
    Lalkhen, Abdul
    Ito, Manabu
    Wilson, Nicky
    Treanor, Caroline
    Dugan, Sheila
    Davies, Benjamin M.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [37] Gene Therapy for Hemophilia A: A Mixed Methods Study of Patient Preferences and Shared Decision-Making
    Limjoco, Jacqueline
    Thornburg, Courtney D.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 1093 - 1105
  • [38] COMMUNITY SENSITIZATION AND DECISION-MAKING FOR TRIAL PARTICIPATION: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY FROM THE GAMBIA
    Dierickx, Susan
    O'Neill, Sarah
    Gryseels, Charlotte
    Immaculate, Edna A.
    Bannister-Tyrell, Melanie
    Okebe, Joseph
    Mwesigwa, Julia
    Jaiteh, Fatou
    Gerrets, Rene
    Ravinetto, Raffaella
    D'Alessandro, Umberto
    Grietens, Koen Peeters
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2017, 97 (05): : 551 - 551
  • [39] Shared Decision-Making With a Virtual Patient in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study
    Jacklin, Simon
    Maskrey, Neal
    Chapman, Stephen
    JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [40] Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
    Williams, Denitza
    Edwards, Adrian
    Wood, Fiona
    Lloyd, Amy
    Brain, Kate
    Thomas, Nerys
    Prichard, Alison
    Goodland, Annwen
    Sweetland, Helen
    McGarrigle, Helen
    Hill, Gwenllian
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):