Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:29
|
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Collaborative goal-setting intervention for clinical supervision: A mixed-methods pilot of a fidelity intervention
    McGuire, Alan
    Bartholomew, Tom
    Blaney-Rychener, Mary
    Anderson, Adrienne
    Bauer, Sarah
    White, Dominique
    Salyers, Michelle
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 13
  • [22] Injury rehabilitation: A goal-setting intervention study
    Evans, L
    Hardy, L
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2002, 73 (03) : 310 - 319
  • [23] Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA
    Selva, Anna
    Lopez, Pilar
    Puig, Teresa
    Macia, Francesc
    Selva, Clara
    Alvarez-Perez, Yolanda
    Terraza, Rebeca
    Buron, Andrea
    Machlab, Salvador Tarek
    Pericay, Carles
    Sola, Ivan
    Tora, Nuria
    Rodriguez, Vanesa
    Barrufet, Cristina
    Aymar, Anna
    Bare, Marisa
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [24] Development of a Model of Interprofessional Shared Clinical Decision Making in the ICU: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Ganz, Freda DeKeyser
    Engelberg, Ruth
    Torres, Nicole
    Curtis, Jared Randall
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (04) : 680 - 689
  • [25] Family medicine residents' perspectives on shared decision-making: A mixed methods study
    Sandhu, Amrita
    Grad, Roland
    Bousbiat, Ilhem
    Issa, Amalia M.
    Abbasgolizadeh-Rahimi, Samira
    'Souza, Vinita
    Elwyn, Glyn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 128
  • [26] Understanding decision-making processes of prospective adoptive parents: A mixed-methods study
    Willis, Bethany
    Hrapczynski, Katie
    Fortner, Cheryl
    FAMILY RELATIONS, 2024, 73 (05) : 2961 - 2980
  • [27] Perspective taking and decision-making in educational game play: A mixed-methods study
    Hilliard, Lacey J.
    Buckingham, Mary H.
    Geldhof, G. John
    Gansert, Patricia
    Stack, Caroline
    Gelgoot, Erin S.
    Bers, Marina U.
    Lerner, Richard M.
    APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 22 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [28] What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study
    Santema, T. B. Katrien
    Stoffer, E. Anniek
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Koelemay, Mark J. W.
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (02):
  • [29] Individual Differences in Rater Decision-Making Style: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study
    Baker, Beverly Anne
    LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT QUARTERLY, 2012, 9 (03) : 225 - 248
  • [30] Patient decision-making and regret in pilonidal sinus surgery: a mixed-methods study
    Strong, Emily
    Callaghan, Tia
    Beal, Erin
    Moffatt, Christine
    Wickramasekera, Nyantara
    Brown, Steven
    Lee, Matthew J.
    Winton, Catherine
    Hind, Daniel
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (06) : 1487 - 1498