Comparing different methods for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus

被引:8
|
作者
Lopez-Rendon, X. [1 ]
Walgraeve, M. S. [2 ]
Woussen, S. [2 ]
Dedulle, A. [1 ]
Zhang, G. [2 ]
Bosmans, H. [1 ,2 ]
Zanca, F. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Med Phys & Qual Assessment, Dept Imaging & Pathol, Herestr 49,Box 7003, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] GE Healthcare, Buc, France
关键词
Pregnancy; Dose to the conceptus; Tube current modulation; Commercial software package; Monte Carlo simulations; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; PREGNANT PATIENTS; MULTIDETECTOR CT; GESTATION; PATIENT; PHANTOM; FETUS; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-016-4389-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To compare different methods available in the literature for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus (D-conceptus) against a patient-specific Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and a commercial software package (CSP). Eight voxel models from abdominopelvic CT exams of pregnant patients were generated. D-conceptus was calculated with an MC framework including patient-specific longitudinal tube current modulation (TCM). For the same patients, dose to the uterus, D-uterus, was calculated as an alternative for D-conceptus, with a CSP that uses a standard-size, non-pregnant phantom and a generic TCM curve. The percentage error between D-uterus and D-conceptus was studied. Dose to the conceptus and percent error with respect to D-conceptus was also estimated for three methods in the literature. The percentage error ranged from -15.9% to 40.0% when comparing MC to CSP. When comparing the TCM profiles with the generic TCM profile from the CSP, differences were observed due to patient habitus and conceptus position. For the other methods, the percentage error ranged from -30.1% to 13.5% but applicability was limited. Estimating an accurate D-conceptus requires a patient-specific approach that the CSP investigated cannot provide. Available methods in the literature can provide a better estimation if applicable to patient-specific cases. aEuro cent A patient's internal anatomy affects the dose to the conceptus. aEuro cent Conceptus position has an influence on its dose estimation. aEuro cent Patient anatomy and specific TCM must be considered for accurate conceptus dosimetry. aEuro cent D (uterus) to a standard-size phantom should not be used as D (conceptus) .
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 858
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] METHODS OF CALCULATING RADIATION ABSORBED DOSE
    WEGST, AV
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1987, 14 (03): : 269 - 271
  • [42] Visualization of Radiation Dose by Bioanalytical Methods
    Tsuyama, Naohiro
    BUNSEKI KAGAKU, 2014, 63 (06) : 445 - 453
  • [43] RAPID METHOD OF ESTIMATING BETA-RADIATION DOSE
    VUKOLOV, VI
    SHTEMBERG, SV
    SHEVYREV, VS
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES-USSR, 1972, 15 (03): : 437 - +
  • [44] Estimating Radiation Dose in Abdominal Fat Quantitative CT
    Li, X.
    Yang, K.
    Liu, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3394 - 3394
  • [45] Comparing different propensity score estimation methods for estimating the marginal causal effect through standardization to propensity scores
    Gharibzadeh, Safoora
    Mansournia, Mohammad Ali
    Rahimiforoushani, Abbas
    Alizadeh, Ahad
    Amouzegar, Atieh
    Mehrabani-Zeinabad, Kamran
    Mohammad, Kazem
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 47 (04) : 964 - 976
  • [46] Estimating and comparing greenhouse gas emissions with their uncertainties using different methods: A case study for an energy supply utility
    Lee, Sangil
    Choi, Yongmoon
    Woo, Jinchun
    Kang, Woong
    Jung, Jinsang
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (10) : 1164 - 1173
  • [47] Organ Dose and Radiation Exposure Risk: A Study Comparing Radiation Dose Using Two Software Packages
    Asiri, Abdullah Ali M.
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 30 (04): : 2509 - 2520
  • [48] INFERENTIAL STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ESTIMATING AND COMPARING COSINOR PARAMETERS
    BINGHAM, C
    ARBOGAST, B
    GUILLAUME, GC
    LEE, JK
    HALBERG, F
    CHRONOBIOLOGIA, 1982, 9 (04) : 397 - 439
  • [49] Comparing a new algorithm with the classic methods for estimating the number of factors
    Henry, RC
    Park, ES
    Spiegelman, CH
    CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1999, 48 (01) : 91 - 97
  • [50] Comparing methods for estimating annualized costs using administrative claims
    Kelly, Amanda
    Kuang, Kammy
    Gibbs, Liza
    Luo, Kaiyi
    Petruski-Ivleva, Natalia
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 323 - 324