Comparing different methods for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus

被引:8
|
作者
Lopez-Rendon, X. [1 ]
Walgraeve, M. S. [2 ]
Woussen, S. [2 ]
Dedulle, A. [1 ]
Zhang, G. [2 ]
Bosmans, H. [1 ,2 ]
Zanca, F. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Div Med Phys & Qual Assessment, Dept Imaging & Pathol, Herestr 49,Box 7003, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] GE Healthcare, Buc, France
关键词
Pregnancy; Dose to the conceptus; Tube current modulation; Commercial software package; Monte Carlo simulations; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; PREGNANT PATIENTS; MULTIDETECTOR CT; GESTATION; PATIENT; PHANTOM; FETUS; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-016-4389-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To compare different methods available in the literature for estimating radiation dose to the conceptus (D-conceptus) against a patient-specific Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and a commercial software package (CSP). Eight voxel models from abdominopelvic CT exams of pregnant patients were generated. D-conceptus was calculated with an MC framework including patient-specific longitudinal tube current modulation (TCM). For the same patients, dose to the uterus, D-uterus, was calculated as an alternative for D-conceptus, with a CSP that uses a standard-size, non-pregnant phantom and a generic TCM curve. The percentage error between D-uterus and D-conceptus was studied. Dose to the conceptus and percent error with respect to D-conceptus was also estimated for three methods in the literature. The percentage error ranged from -15.9% to 40.0% when comparing MC to CSP. When comparing the TCM profiles with the generic TCM profile from the CSP, differences were observed due to patient habitus and conceptus position. For the other methods, the percentage error ranged from -30.1% to 13.5% but applicability was limited. Estimating an accurate D-conceptus requires a patient-specific approach that the CSP investigated cannot provide. Available methods in the literature can provide a better estimation if applicable to patient-specific cases. aEuro cent A patient's internal anatomy affects the dose to the conceptus. aEuro cent Conceptus position has an influence on its dose estimation. aEuro cent Patient anatomy and specific TCM must be considered for accurate conceptus dosimetry. aEuro cent D (uterus) to a standard-size phantom should not be used as D (conceptus) .
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 858
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of different methods of estimating the effective dose and the ambient dose equivalent for neutrons from measured prompt gamma intensities
    Udupi, Ashwini
    Shetty, Pramoda Kumara
    Panikkath, Priyada
    Sarkar, Pradip Kumar
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2021, 993
  • [32] COMPARING SOME METHODS OF ESTIMATING MEAN AREAL RAINFALL
    SINGH, VP
    CHOWDHURY, PK
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1986, 22 (02): : 275 - 282
  • [33] Methods for comparing the results of different studies
    Eckert, SE
    Choi, YG
    Koka, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (05) : 697 - 705
  • [34] Comparing Different Methods for Homocysteine Determination
    Zappacosta, Bruno
    Persichilli, Silvia
    Scribano, Donata
    Minucci, Angelo
    Lazzaro, Daniele
    De Sole, Pasquale
    Giardina, Bruno
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (11) : 1139 - 1142
  • [36] METHODS OF COMPARING DIFFERENT BRONCHODILATORS IN ASTHMA
    FREEDMAN, BJ
    BULLETIN DE PHYSIO-PATHOLOGIE RESPIRATOIRE, 1972, 8 (03): : 701 - &
  • [37] Estimating dose delivery accuracy in stereotactic body radiation therapy: A review of in-vivo measurement methods
    Esposito, Marco
    Villaggi, Elena
    Bresciani, Sara
    Cilla, Savino
    Falco, Maria Daniela
    Garibaldi, Cristina
    Russo, Serenella
    Talamonti, Cinzia
    Stasi, Michele
    Mancosu, Pietro
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 149 : 158 - 167
  • [38] A phantom study comparing radiation dose differences due to different dose-calculation algorithms as a function of lung density.
    Aarup, L.
    Korreman, S.
    Nystroem, H.
    Juhler-Nottrup, T.
    Specht, L.
    Juternark, B.
    Nahum, AE.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 81 : S99 - S100
  • [39] Analysis of Statistical Methods for Estimating Solar Radiation
    Aleksandar, Jankovic
    Branislava, Lalic
    GEOGRAPHICA PANNONICA, 2014, 18 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [40] ESTIMATING SOLAR RADIATION BY MACHINE LEARNING METHODS
    Ertugrul, Edip
    Sahin, Mehmet
    Aggun, Fikri
    2015 23RD SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2015, : 1611 - 1614