Comparison of the effects of cement removal from zirconia and titanium abutments: An in vitro study

被引:8
|
作者
Dahiya, Ankur [1 ]
Baba, Nadim Z. [2 ]
Kattadiyil, Mathew T. [3 ]
Goodacre, Charles J. [3 ]
Mann, Akshita [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Prosthodont, Suite 5337,7500 Cambridge St, Houston, TX 77054 USA
[2] Loma Linda Sch Dent, Hugh Love Ctr Res & Educ Technol, Loma Linda, CA USA
[3] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Dent, Adv Specialty Educ Program Prosthodont, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
[4] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Houston, TX 77054 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2019年 / 121卷 / 03期
关键词
PLASTIC INSTRUMENTS; IMPLANT ABUTMENTS; EXCESS CEMENT; BOND STRENGTH; RESTORATIONS; SURFACE; CERAMICS; METAL; COLOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Excess cement around dental implants is a significant cause of peri-implant inflammation. Research has focused on approaches to cement removal, the type of cement used, and the different instruments used for cement removal with titanium abutments. However, data comparing zirconia with titanium abutments are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of excess cement removal from zirconia and titanium custom abutments using an explorer and to compare the effects of cement removal on the abutment surfaces. Material and methods. Implant analogs were placed in a cast in the position of the 2 maxillary central incisors. After creating similar emergence profiles for both the implant abutments, 18 zirconia and titanium custom abutments were fabricated with 1-mm subgingival finish lines on the facial and interproximal areas and an equigingival finish line on the palatal side. The crowns were cemented with zinc oxide-eugenol cement, and a steel explorer was used to remove the excess cement. All abutments were analyzed under a scanning electron microscope for cement remnants and scratches. Results. The mean surface area of cement remnants on the zirconia abutments was 778 +/- 113 mu m(2 )and for titanium abutments, it was 1123 +/- 252 mu m(2), which in terms of the mean percentage area was 3.27% of the total surface area of zirconia and 4.71% of titanium abutments. Only a few abutments from each group showed scratches, and no deep scratches or gouges were observed. Conclusions. Zirconia and titanium abutments had statistically similar cement remnants. Scratches were observed on only a few specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 509
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Customized Abutments Made from Titanium and a Machinable Precious Alloy
    Lee, Jee-Ho
    Park, Ji-Man
    Park, Eun-Jin
    Koak, Jai-Young
    Kim, Seong-Kyun
    Heo, Seong-Joo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (01) : 92 - 100
  • [42] Comparison of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Around Zirconia and Titanium Abutments in the Aesthetic Zone: A Narrative Review
    Abu Al-Faraj, Turki M.
    Alsubhi, Bashaer M.
    Almarhoon, Abeer N.
    Almarshoud, Abdulaziz A.
    Alqattan, Mohammed S.
    Alqahtani, Shahad H.
    Al Osaimi, Ahmed A.
    Alshammari, Latifah Saad
    Almakrami, Abdullah I.
    Alwadai, Yazeed S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [43] A Comparison of Precision of Fit, Rotational Freedom, and Torque Loss with Copy-Milled Zirconia and Prefabricated Titanium Abutments
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    Monzavi, Abbas
    Bassir, Seyed Hossein
    Naini, Roshanak Baghai
    Khosronedjad, Nasim
    Keshavarz, Sareh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (04) : 996 - 1002
  • [44] Early bacterial colonization and soft tissue health around zirconia and titanium abutments: an in vivo study in man
    van Brakel, Ralph
    Cune, Marco S.
    van Winkelhoff, Arie Jan
    de Putter, Cornelis
    Verhoeven, Jan Willem
    van der Reijden, Wil
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (06) : 571 - 577
  • [45] Clinical performance of zirconia implant abutments luted to a titanium base - a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Happe, Arndt
    von Glasser, Gerrit Schulze
    Neugebauer, Jorg
    Strick, Kilian
    Smeets, Ralf
    Rutkowski, Rico
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2022, 25 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [46] A comparison of four decontamination procedures in Reusing healing abutments: An in vitro study
    Naghsh, Narges
    Hosseini, Arezoo
    Mogharehabed, Ahmad
    Yaghini, Jaber
    Pezeshki, Zahra
    Khaleghi, Niloofar
    SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (08) : 1141 - 1145
  • [47] The qualitative effects of various types of hygiene instrumentation on commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implant abutments: an in vitro and scanning electron microscope study
    Brookshire, FV
    Nagy, WW
    Dhuru, VB
    Ziebert, GJ
    Chada, S
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1997, 78 (03): : 286 - 294
  • [48] The Fracture Resistance Comparison between Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments with and without Ageing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chmielewski, Marek
    Dabrowski, Wojciech
    Ordyniec-Kwasnica, Iwona
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (09)
  • [49] An In Vitro Comparison of Fracture Load of Zirconia Custom Abutments with Internal Connection and Different Angulations and Thicknesses: Part II
    Zandparsa, Roya
    Albosefi, Abdalah
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (02): : 151 - 155
  • [50] An In Vitro Comparison of Fracture Load of Zirconia Custom Abutments with Internal Connection and Different Angulations and Thickness: Part I
    Albosefi, Abdalah
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Zandparsa, Roya
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (04): : 296 - 301