Comparison of the effects of cement removal from zirconia and titanium abutments: An in vitro study

被引:8
|
作者
Dahiya, Ankur [1 ]
Baba, Nadim Z. [2 ]
Kattadiyil, Mathew T. [3 ]
Goodacre, Charles J. [3 ]
Mann, Akshita [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent & Prosthodont, Suite 5337,7500 Cambridge St, Houston, TX 77054 USA
[2] Loma Linda Sch Dent, Hugh Love Ctr Res & Educ Technol, Loma Linda, CA USA
[3] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Dent, Adv Specialty Educ Program Prosthodont, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
[4] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Endodont, Houston, TX 77054 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2019年 / 121卷 / 03期
关键词
PLASTIC INSTRUMENTS; IMPLANT ABUTMENTS; EXCESS CEMENT; BOND STRENGTH; RESTORATIONS; SURFACE; CERAMICS; METAL; COLOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.07.006
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Excess cement around dental implants is a significant cause of peri-implant inflammation. Research has focused on approaches to cement removal, the type of cement used, and the different instruments used for cement removal with titanium abutments. However, data comparing zirconia with titanium abutments are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effectiveness of excess cement removal from zirconia and titanium custom abutments using an explorer and to compare the effects of cement removal on the abutment surfaces. Material and methods. Implant analogs were placed in a cast in the position of the 2 maxillary central incisors. After creating similar emergence profiles for both the implant abutments, 18 zirconia and titanium custom abutments were fabricated with 1-mm subgingival finish lines on the facial and interproximal areas and an equigingival finish line on the palatal side. The crowns were cemented with zinc oxide-eugenol cement, and a steel explorer was used to remove the excess cement. All abutments were analyzed under a scanning electron microscope for cement remnants and scratches. Results. The mean surface area of cement remnants on the zirconia abutments was 778 +/- 113 mu m(2 )and for titanium abutments, it was 1123 +/- 252 mu m(2), which in terms of the mean percentage area was 3.27% of the total surface area of zirconia and 4.71% of titanium abutments. Only a few abutments from each group showed scratches, and no deep scratches or gouges were observed. Conclusions. Zirconia and titanium abutments had statistically similar cement remnants. Scratches were observed on only a few specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 509
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Load-Bearing Capacity of Zirconia Crowns Screwed to Multi-Unit Abutments with and without a Titanium Base: An In Vitro Pilot Study
    Heller, Hadas
    Arieli, Adi
    Beitlitum, Ilan
    Pilo, Raphael
    Levartovsky, Shifra
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (19)
  • [32] Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study
    Gehrke, Peter
    Bleuel, Konstantin
    Fischer, Carsten
    Sader, Robert
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [33] Effects of sandblasting distance and angles on resin cement bonding to zirconia and titanium
    Ho, Beatrice Jane
    Tsoi, James Kit-Hon
    Liu, Dan
    Lung, Christie Ying-Kei
    Wong, Hai-Ming
    Matinlinna, Jukka P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2015, 62 : 25 - 31
  • [34] Fracture Resistance of Additively Manufactured Zirconia Crowns when Cemented to Implant Supported Zirconia Abutments: An in vitro Study
    Zandinejad, Amirali
    Methani, Mohammad Mujtaba
    Schneiderman, Emet D.
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    Morton, Dean
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (08): : 893 - 897
  • [35] The effects of the coupling of titanium implants and dissimilar metal abutments on osteoblast differentiation in vitro
    Taylor, JC
    Anderson, GI
    Sutow, EJ
    Driscoll, CF
    Mackey, DC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1999, 14 (06) : 785 - 797
  • [36] 13-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study on zirconia and titanium abutments
    Humm, Viviane Laura
    Sailer, Irena
    Thoma, Daniel Stefan
    Hammerle, Christoph Hans Franz
    Jung, Ronald Ernst
    Zembic, Anja
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (09) : 911 - 919
  • [37] Using Er:YAG laser to remove lithium disilicate crowns from zirconia implant abutments: An in vitro study
    Deeb, Janina Golob
    Bencharit, Sompop
    Dalal, Nishchal
    Abdulmajeed, Aous
    Grzech-Lesniak, Kinga
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (11):
  • [38] Implant Angulation Effect on the Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Zirconia Custom Abutments: An In Vitro Study
    Katsavochristou, Anastasia
    Sierraalta, Marianella
    Saglik, Berna
    Koumoulis, Dimitrios
    George, Furat
    Razzoog, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (05): : 394 - 400
  • [39] Rotating titanium brush for plaque removal from rough titanium surfaces - an in vitro study
    John, Gordon
    Becker, Juergen
    Schwarz, Frank
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (07) : 838 - 842
  • [40] Biocompatibility and antibacterial properties of zirconium nitride coating on titanium abutments: An in vitro study
    Brunello, Giulia
    Brun, Paola
    Gardin, Chiara
    Ferroni, Letizia
    Bressan, Eriberto
    Meneghello, Roberto
    Zavan, Barbara
    Sivolella, Stefano
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):