Comparison of Parameter Identification Techniques

被引:3
|
作者
Eder, Rafael [1 ]
Zehetner, Christian [1 ]
Kunze, Wolfgang [2 ]
机构
[1] Linz Ctr Mechatron GmbH, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[2] Salvagnini Maschinenbau GmbH, A-4482 Ennsdorf, Austria
关键词
D O I
10.1051/matecconf/20167009007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Model-based control of mechatronic systems requires excellent knowledge about the physical behavior of each component. For several types of components of a system, e.g. mechanical or electrical ones, the dynamic behavior can be described by means of a mathematic model consisting of a set of differential equations, difference equations and/or algebraic constraint equations. The knowledge of a realistic mathematic model and its parameter values is essential to represent the behaviour of a mechatronic system. Frequently it is hard or impossible to obtain all required values of the model parameters from the producer, so an appropriate parameter estimation technique is required to compute missing parameters. A manifold of parameter identification techniques can be found in the literature, but their suitability depends on the mathematic model. Previous work dealt with the automatic assembly of mathematical models of serial and parallel robots with drives and controllers within the dynamic multibody simulation code HOTINT as fully-fledged mechatronic simulation. Several parameters of such robot models were identified successfully by our embedded algorithm. The present work proposes an improved version of the identification algorithm with higher performance. The quality of the identified parameter values and the computation effort are compared with another standard technique.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Standstill Parameter Identification Methods for Induction Motors
    Khamehchi, Sina
    Molsa, Eemeli
    Hinkkanen, Marko
    2018 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SENSORLESS CONTROL FOR ELECTRICAL DRIVES (SLED 2018), 2018, : 156 - 161
  • [32] USE AND COMPARISON OF PARAMETER ESTIMATING FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SUPERHEATER PLANT
    BAUER, B
    GOHRING, B
    BRENNSTOFF-WARME-KRAFT, 1975, 27 (09): : 348 - 351
  • [33] Comparison of techniques for identification of peripheral vestibular nystagmus
    West, P. D. B.
    Sheppard, Z. A.
    King, E. V.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2012, 126 (12): : 1209 - 1215
  • [34] A COMPARISON OF ELECTROPHORETIC TECHNIQUES FOR THE SPECIES IDENTIFICATION OF MEAT
    SLATTERY, WJ
    SINCLAIR, AJ
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY IN AUSTRALIA, 1987, 39 (03): : 105 - 108
  • [35] COMPARISON OF 2 IMPULSE RESPONSE IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES
    BUTCHER, WE
    COOK, GE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1970, AC15 (01) : 129 - &
  • [36] COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES FOR ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF ANAEROBIC BACTERIA
    DOWELL, VR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1972, 25 (12): : 1335 - 1343
  • [37] Comparison of Numerical Differentiation Techniques for Aircraft Identification
    Brunot, Mathieu
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2019, 32 (05)
  • [38] COMPARISON OF 2 DISSIMILAR MODAL IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES
    PAPPA, RS
    SCHENK, A
    NIEDBAL, N
    KLUSOWSKI, E
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1992, 15 (04) : 840 - 846
  • [39] Comparison of two identification techniques: Theory and application
    Vandanjon, Pierre-Olivier
    Janot, Alexandre
    Gautier, Maxime
    Khatounian, Flavia
    ICINCO 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS IN CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS, VOL RA-1: ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL 1, 2007, : 341 - 347
  • [40] Comparison of forest parameter estimation techniques using SAR data
    Kim, Y
    van Zyl, J
    IGARSS 2001: SCANNING THE PRESENT AND RESOLVING THE FUTURE, VOLS 1-7, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 1395 - 1397