Prediction of hepatitis E using machine learning models

被引:25
|
作者
Guo, Yanhui [1 ]
Feng, Yi [2 ,3 ]
Qu, Fuli [1 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ,3 ]
Yan, Bingyu [2 ,3 ]
Lv, Jingjing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Womens Univ, Sch Data & Comp Sci, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Shandong Prov Key Lab Infect Dis Control & Preven, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Acad Prevent Med, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0237750
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Accurate and reliable predictions of infectious disease can be valuable to public health organizations that plan interventions to decrease or prevent disease transmission. A great variety of models have been developed for this task. However, for different data series, the performance of these models varies. Hepatitis E, as an acute liver disease, has been a major public health problem. Which model is more appropriate for predicting the incidence of hepatitis E? In this paper, three different methods are used and the performance of the three methods is compared. Methods Autoregressive integrated moving average(ARIMA), support vector machine(SVM) and long short-term memory(LSTM) recurrent neural network were adopted and compared. ARIMA was implemented by python with the help of statsmodels. SVM was accomplished by matlab with libSVM library. LSTM was designed by ourselves with Keras, a deep learning library. To tackle the problem of overfitting caused by limited training samples, we adopted dropout and regularization strategies in our LSTM model. Experimental data were obtained from the monthly incidence and cases number of hepatitis E from January 2005 to December 2017 in Shandong province, China. We selected data from July 2015 to December 2017 to validate the models, and the rest was taken as training set. Three metrics were applied to compare the performance of models, including root mean square error(RMSE), mean absolute percentage error(MAPE) and mean absolute error(MAE). Results By analyzing data, we tookARIMA(1, 1, 1),ARIMA(3, 1, 2) as monthly incidence prediction model and cases number prediction model, respectively. Cross-validation and grid search were used to optimize parameters of SVM. Penalty coefficientCand kernel function parametergwere set 8, 0.125 for incidence prediction, and 22, 0.01 for cases number prediction. LSTM has 4 nodes. Dropout and L2 regularization parameters were set 0.15, 0.001, respectively. By the metrics of RMSE, we obtained 0.022, 0.0204, 0.01 for incidence prediction, using ARIMA, SVM and LSTM. And we obtained 22.25, 20.0368, 11.75 for cases number prediction, using three models. For MAPE metrics, the results were 23.5%, 21.7%, 15.08%, and 23.6%, 21.44%, 13.6%, for incidence prediction and cases number prediction, respectively. For MAE metrics, the results were 0.018, 0.0167, 0.011 and 18.003, 16.5815, 9.984, for incidence prediction and cases number prediction, respectively. Conclusions Comparing ARIMA, SVM and LSTM, we found that nonlinear models(SVM, LSTM) outperform linear models(ARIMA). LSTM obtained the best performance in all three metrics of RSME, MAPE, MAE. Hence, LSTM is the most suitable for predicting hepatitis E monthly incidence and cases number.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USING MACHINE LEARNING TO DEVELOP MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL CANCERS
    Ho, Kai Man Alexander
    Rosenfeld, Avi
    Hogan, Aine
    McBain, Hazel
    Duku, Margaret
    Wolfson, Paul
    Wilson, Ashley
    Lovat, Laurence
    GUT, 2022, 71 : A3 - A3
  • [42] Gold and Silver Price Prediction using Hybrid Machine Learning Models
    Goel, Sakshi
    Saxena, Merry
    Sarangi, Pradeepta Kumar
    Rani, Lekha
    PDGC 2022 - 2022 7th International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing, 2022, : 390 - 395
  • [43] Analysis of breast cancer prediction and visualisation using machine learning models
    Magesh G.
    Swarnalatha P.
    International Journal of Cloud Computing, 2022, 11 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [44] Protein structure prediction (RMSD ≤ 5 Å) using machine learning models
    Pathak, Yadunath
    Rana, Prashant Singh
    Singh, P. K.
    Saraswat, Mukesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 14 (01) : 71 - 85
  • [45] Prediction of hospital readmission of multimorbid patients using machine learning models
    Le Lay, Jules
    Alfonso-Lizarazo, Edgar
    Augusto, Vincent
    Bongue, Bienvenu
    Masmoudi, Malek
    Xie, Xiaolan
    Gramont, Baptiste
    Celarier, Thomas
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [46] Prediction of magnetic nature of oxide compositions by using machine learning models
    Siddique, Abu Bakar
    Ali, Nasir
    Hamraz, Muhammad
    Khan, Saadut Ullah
    Khattak, Shaukat Ali
    COMPUTATIONAL CONDENSED MATTER, 2024, 40
  • [47] Landslide Classification and Prediction of Debris Flow Using Machine Learning Models
    Shameem Ansar, A.
    Sudha, S.
    Vinayagamoorthi, Savita
    Menachery, Michelle Marianne
    Francis, Suresh
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2024, 70 (04) : 3763 - 3779
  • [48] Prediction of baking quality using machine learning based intelligent models
    Hilal Isleroglu
    Selami Beyhan
    Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 56 : 2045 - 2055
  • [49] Effect of Climate on Photovoltaic Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Models
    Alcaniz, Alba
    Lindfors, Anders, V
    Zeman, Miro
    Ziar, Hesan
    Isabella, Olindo
    GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [50] Sustainable Stock Market Prediction Framework Using Machine Learning Models
    Garcia Penalvo, Francisco Jose
    Maan, Tamanna
    Singh, Sunil K.
    Kumar, Sudhakar
    Arya, Varsha
    Chui, Kwok Tai
    Singh, Gaurav Pratap
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE-IJSSCI, 2022, 14 (01):