Prediction of hepatitis E using machine learning models

被引:25
|
作者
Guo, Yanhui [1 ]
Feng, Yi [2 ,3 ]
Qu, Fuli [1 ]
Zhang, Li [2 ,3 ]
Yan, Bingyu [2 ,3 ]
Lv, Jingjing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Womens Univ, Sch Data & Comp Sci, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Shandong Prov Key Lab Infect Dis Control & Preven, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Acad Prevent Med, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0237750
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Accurate and reliable predictions of infectious disease can be valuable to public health organizations that plan interventions to decrease or prevent disease transmission. A great variety of models have been developed for this task. However, for different data series, the performance of these models varies. Hepatitis E, as an acute liver disease, has been a major public health problem. Which model is more appropriate for predicting the incidence of hepatitis E? In this paper, three different methods are used and the performance of the three methods is compared. Methods Autoregressive integrated moving average(ARIMA), support vector machine(SVM) and long short-term memory(LSTM) recurrent neural network were adopted and compared. ARIMA was implemented by python with the help of statsmodels. SVM was accomplished by matlab with libSVM library. LSTM was designed by ourselves with Keras, a deep learning library. To tackle the problem of overfitting caused by limited training samples, we adopted dropout and regularization strategies in our LSTM model. Experimental data were obtained from the monthly incidence and cases number of hepatitis E from January 2005 to December 2017 in Shandong province, China. We selected data from July 2015 to December 2017 to validate the models, and the rest was taken as training set. Three metrics were applied to compare the performance of models, including root mean square error(RMSE), mean absolute percentage error(MAPE) and mean absolute error(MAE). Results By analyzing data, we tookARIMA(1, 1, 1),ARIMA(3, 1, 2) as monthly incidence prediction model and cases number prediction model, respectively. Cross-validation and grid search were used to optimize parameters of SVM. Penalty coefficientCand kernel function parametergwere set 8, 0.125 for incidence prediction, and 22, 0.01 for cases number prediction. LSTM has 4 nodes. Dropout and L2 regularization parameters were set 0.15, 0.001, respectively. By the metrics of RMSE, we obtained 0.022, 0.0204, 0.01 for incidence prediction, using ARIMA, SVM and LSTM. And we obtained 22.25, 20.0368, 11.75 for cases number prediction, using three models. For MAPE metrics, the results were 23.5%, 21.7%, 15.08%, and 23.6%, 21.44%, 13.6%, for incidence prediction and cases number prediction, respectively. For MAE metrics, the results were 0.018, 0.0167, 0.011 and 18.003, 16.5815, 9.984, for incidence prediction and cases number prediction, respectively. Conclusions Comparing ARIMA, SVM and LSTM, we found that nonlinear models(SVM, LSTM) outperform linear models(ARIMA). LSTM obtained the best performance in all three metrics of RSME, MAPE, MAE. Hence, LSTM is the most suitable for predicting hepatitis E monthly incidence and cases number.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis using machine learning models
    Zhou, You
    Han, Fei
    Shi, Xiao-Lei
    Zhang, Jun-Xian
    Li, Guang-Yao
    Yuan, Chen-Chen
    Lu, Guo-Tao
    Hu, Liang-Hao
    Pan, Jia-Jia
    Xiao, Wei-Ming
    Yao, Guang-Huai
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2022, 134 (07) : 703 - 710
  • [22] Forecasting Publications’ Success Using Machine Learning Prediction Models
    Alchokr, Rand
    Haider, Rayed
    Shakeel, Yusra
    Leich, Thomas
    Saake, Gunter
    Krüger, Jacob
    CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2023, 3617 : 77 - 89
  • [23] Energy Prediction in IoT Systems Using Machine Learning Models
    Balaji, S.
    Karthik, S.
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 75 (01): : 443 - 459
  • [24] Absenteeism Prediction: A Comparative Study Using Machine Learning Models
    Dogruyol, Kagan
    Sekeroglu, Boran
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND APPLICATION OF SOFT COMPUTING, COMPUTING WITH WORDS AND PERCEPTIONS - ICSCCW-2019, 2020, 1095 : 728 - 734
  • [25] Personalized Knee Angle Prediction Models Using Machine Learning
    Pal, Antarleen
    Prakash, Chandra
    ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2022, : 149 - 155
  • [26] Mortality Prediction in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Models
    Ahmad, Fawad
    Ayub, Huma
    Liaqat, Rehan
    Khan, Akhyar Ali
    Nawaz, Ali
    Younis, Babar
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 372 - 376
  • [27] Airbnb Rental Price Prediction Using Machine Learning Models
    Lektorov, Alexander
    Abdelfattah, Eman
    Joshi, Shreehar
    2023 IEEE 13TH ANNUAL COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP AND CONFERENCE, CCWC, 2023, : 339 - 344
  • [28] Early Prediction of Diabetes Using an Ensemble of Machine Learning Models
    Dutta, Aishwariya
    Hasan, Md Kamrul
    Ahmad, Mohiuddin
    Awal, Md Abdul
    Islam, Md Akhtarul
    Masud, Mehedi
    Meshref, Hossam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [29] Prediction models using machine learning: The focus remains on prevention
    Argalious, Maged Y.
    Farag, Ehab
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2020, 67
  • [30] Hepatitis C virus data analysis and prediction using machine learning
    Yaganoglu, Mete
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2022, 142