Capsule contraction after continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis: Poly(methyl methacrylate) versus silicone intraocular lenses

被引:53
|
作者
Cochener, B [1 ]
Jacq, PL [1 ]
Colin, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brest, Dept Ophthalmol, Brest, France
来源
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY | 1999年 / 25卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00227-8
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the progressive contraction of the anterior capsule opening after in the-bag implantation of 2 types of intraocular lenses (IOLs). Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Brest, Brest, France. Methods: in this prospective study, 32 single-piece poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) (Pharmacia 812 C) and 30 3-piece silicone IOLs with PMMA haptics (Allergan SI-40NB) were implanted in the bag after standardized phacoemulsification performed by the same surgeon. Aii patients were older than 70 years, and none had zonular weakness. The surface of continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) was measured 1, 30, and 150 days postoperatively using a 3 charge-coupled device camera and a digitized computer analysis system, Results: A significant progressive constriction was observed at 150 days in 70% in the silicone group and 32% in the PMMA group. In addition, CCC contraction was greater in silicone group (P < .05). The mean surface decrease was 4.20 mm(2) in the silicone group and 1.53 mm(2) in the PMMA group. There was no correlation between sex, age, initial capsulorhexis area, and final capsule shrinkage. In some eyes, especially in those with a single-piece PMMA IOL (41 %), there was no constriction, but fine changes in the capsule opening were seen. Conclusion: Evolutive anterior capsulorhexis modifications were observed in all patients; however, the contraction rate was statistically higher in the silicone group. These results suggest that silicone IOL implantation should be avoided in eyes at risk for CCC constriction. (C) 1999 ASCRS and ESCRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1369
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OPTICAL DESIGN OF POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    ATCHISON, DA
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1990, 16 (02): : 178 - 187
  • [22] Importance of Complete CCC (Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis) for Centering of Single Peace Acrylic Intraocular Lenses
    Nagata, M.
    Matsushima, H.
    Senoo, T.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [24] Foldable silicons versus poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy
    Braga-Mele, R
    Cohen, S
    Rootman, DS
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 26 (10): : 1517 - 1522
  • [25] Evaluation of cellular adhesions on silicone and poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses in monkey eyes - An electron microscopic study
    Ohnishi, Y
    Yoshitomi, T
    Sakamoto, T
    Fujisawa, K
    Ishibashi, T
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 27 (12): : 2036 - 2040
  • [26] In vitro bacterial adherence to hydrogel and poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses
    Ng, EWM
    Barrett, GD
    Bowman, R
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 : 1331 - 1335
  • [27] Cellular reaction on the anterior surface of poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses
    Pande, MV
    Spalton, DJ
    KerrMuir, MG
    Marshall, J
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1996, 22 : 811 - 817
  • [28] COMPLEMENT ACTIVATION BY SURFACE MODIFIED POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    KOCHOUNIAN, HH
    MAXWELL, WA
    GUPTA, A
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1991, 17 (02): : 139 - 142
  • [29] The effect of ionising radiation on poly(methyl methacrylate) used in intraocular lenses
    Pratt, C. M.
    Barton, S.
    McGonigle, E.
    Kishi, M.
    Foot, P. J. S.
    POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY, 2006, 91 (10) : 2315 - 2317
  • [30] VISUAL DISTURBANCES ASSOCIATED WITH OVAL-OPTIC POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE) AND ROUND-OPTIC SILICONE INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    ANDERSON, CJ
    STURM, RJ
    SHAPIRO, MB
    BALLEW, C
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1994, 20 (03): : 295 - 298