The Analysis of Chemistry Teachers Exam Questions in Regards to the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and Their Comparison with OSYM Questions

被引:0
|
作者
Yildirim, Tamer [1 ]
机构
[1] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Canakkale, Turkey
关键词
Assessments; Bloom taxonomy; chemistry; examination; OSYM;
D O I
10.9779/pauefd.585602
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to analyze the exam questions prepared by chemistry teachers in accordance with the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and to compare the cognitive levels assessed by the questions of the chemistry teachers in the study with the cognitive levels assessed by university entrance exam questions. The study is conducted using document analysis, which one of the qualitative research methods. The data consist of the exam questions (787 in total) prepared by chemistry teachers working in 5 different high schools in the center of Artvin province during the 2018-2019 educational year and chemistry questions in university entrance examination tests (207) within the course of 6 year period (2014-2019). The findings of the study suggest that in terms of cognitive processes dimension, nearly all of the questions of the chemistry teachers (%98) are in the lower cognitive process level and the students are asked from remembering, understanding and applying levels. In terms of knowledge dimension, it is found that that chemistry teachers mostly ask questions at the level of conceptual knowledge. When a comparison is made between the questions of university entrance exam questions and the questions asked by the chemistry teachers, we can see that university entrance exam questions mostly concentrate on conceptual knowledge questions whereas the questions of the chemistry teachers mostly concentrate on factual questions. Procedural knowledge questions are found to be at the same level in both groups. Metacognitive ability questions are never asked by both chemistry teachers and by the Student Selection and Placement Center. In regards to the cognitive processes dimension, it can be concluded the chemistry teachers ask more questions based on remembrance in written exams whereas in university entrance examinations, questions in understanding, applying and analysis levels are used more frequently.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 467
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] USTW Vs. STW: A Comparative Analysis for Exam Question Classification based on Bloom’s Taxonomy
    Gani M.O.
    Ayyasamy R.K.
    Fui T.
    Sangodiah A.
    Mendel, 2022, 28 (02) : 25 - 40
  • [42] Revised Bloom's taxonomy and major theories and frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics: a comparison
    Radmehr, Farzad
    Drake, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 50 (06) : 895 - 920
  • [43] AN AUTOMATIC INFERENCE SYSTEM FOR THE QUALITY ANALYSIS OF TEST ITEMS BASED ON THE BLOOM'S REVISED TAXONOMY
    Chang, Yi-Hsing
    Chen, Huan-Wen
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2852 - 2856
  • [44] Benchmarking higher education programs through alignment analysis based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy
    Lau, Kwok Hung
    Tri Khai Lam
    Kam, Booi Hon
    Nkhoma, Mathews
    Richardson, Joan
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 25 (08) : 2828 - 2849
  • [45] An Analysis of Learning Outcomes in Information Technologies and Software Curriculum based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
    Ozturk, Gulcan
    Karamete, Aysen
    Cetin, Gulcan
    CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2020, 49 (02): : 1061 - 1097
  • [46] A Descriptive Content Analysis of the Extent of Bloom's Taxonomy in the Reading Comprehension Questions of the Course Book Q: Skills for Success 4 Reading and Writing
    Ulum, Omer Gokhan
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2016, 21 (09) : 1674 - 1683
  • [47] Nursing process performance measurement tool based on bloom's revised taxonomy: A validity and reliability analysis
    Lee, Ji Sun
    NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2024, 81
  • [48] AI as a Threat to Education: Contrasting GPT-3 and Google in Answering Questions Along Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
    Li, Nina
    INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, INTELLISYS 2023, 2024, 822 : 469 - 476
  • [49] What faculty write versus what students see? Perspectives on multiple-choice questions using Bloom's taxonomy
    Monrad, Seetha U.
    Zaidi, Nikki L. Bibler
    Grob, Karri L.
    Kurtz, Joshua B.
    Tai, Andrew W.
    Hortsch, Michael
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    Santen, Sally A.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2021, 43 (05) : 575 - 582
  • [50] Analysis of High School Physics National Examination questions based on Bloom Taxonomy and National Examination Question Standard in 2017/2018
    Nurlailiyah, A.
    Deta, U. A.
    Ain, T. N.
    Haq, M. S.
    Lestari, N. A.
    Yantidewi, M.
    NATIONAL PHYSICS SEMINAR (SNF) 2018, 2019, 1171