The Analysis of Chemistry Teachers Exam Questions in Regards to the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and Their Comparison with OSYM Questions

被引:0
|
作者
Yildirim, Tamer [1 ]
机构
[1] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Canakkale, Turkey
关键词
Assessments; Bloom taxonomy; chemistry; examination; OSYM;
D O I
10.9779/pauefd.585602
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to analyze the exam questions prepared by chemistry teachers in accordance with the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and to compare the cognitive levels assessed by the questions of the chemistry teachers in the study with the cognitive levels assessed by university entrance exam questions. The study is conducted using document analysis, which one of the qualitative research methods. The data consist of the exam questions (787 in total) prepared by chemistry teachers working in 5 different high schools in the center of Artvin province during the 2018-2019 educational year and chemistry questions in university entrance examination tests (207) within the course of 6 year period (2014-2019). The findings of the study suggest that in terms of cognitive processes dimension, nearly all of the questions of the chemistry teachers (%98) are in the lower cognitive process level and the students are asked from remembering, understanding and applying levels. In terms of knowledge dimension, it is found that that chemistry teachers mostly ask questions at the level of conceptual knowledge. When a comparison is made between the questions of university entrance exam questions and the questions asked by the chemistry teachers, we can see that university entrance exam questions mostly concentrate on conceptual knowledge questions whereas the questions of the chemistry teachers mostly concentrate on factual questions. Procedural knowledge questions are found to be at the same level in both groups. Metacognitive ability questions are never asked by both chemistry teachers and by the Student Selection and Placement Center. In regards to the cognitive processes dimension, it can be concluded the chemistry teachers ask more questions based on remembrance in written exams whereas in university entrance examinations, questions in understanding, applying and analysis levels are used more frequently.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 467
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metacognitive Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers of Chemistry in Posting Questions
    Santoso, T.
    Yuanita, L.
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION 2016, 2017, 824
  • [32] ANALYSIS ON COGNITIVE THINKING OF AN ASSESSMENT SYSTEM USING REVISED BLOOM'S TAXONOMY
    Uma, D.
    Thenmozhi, S.
    Hansda, Rabin
    2017 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOOCS, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION (MITE), 2017, : 152 - 159
  • [33] The intellectual demands of the intended chemistry curriculum in Czechia, Finland, and Turkey: a comparative analysis based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy
    Elmas, Ridvan
    Rusek, Martin
    Lindell, Anssi
    Nieminen, Pasi
    Kasapoglu, Koray
    Bilek, Martin
    CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (03) : 839 - 851
  • [34] Pushing Critical Thinking Skills With Multiple-Choice Questions: Does Bloom's Taxonomy Work?
    Zaidi, Nikki L. Bibler
    Grob, Karri L.
    Monrad, Seetha M.
    Kurtz, Joshua B.
    Tai, Andrew
    Ahmed, Asra Z.
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    Santen, Sally A.
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2018, 93 (06) : 856 - 859
  • [35] Developing a classification tool based on Bloom,'s taxonomy to assess the cognitive level of short essay questions
    van Hoeij, MJW
    Haarhuis, JCM
    Wierstra, RFA
    van Beukelen, P
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2004, 31 (03) : 261 - 267
  • [36] Analysis of Students' and Teachers' Questions Posted on Chemistry Q&A Board in a Chemistry Education Homepage
    Han, JaeYoung
    Ji, Youn-Jung
    Lee, Jae-Youn
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY-DAEHAN HWAHAK HOE JEE, 2012, 56 (01): : 137 - 143
  • [37] Automatic Indonesia's Questions Classification Based On Bloom's Taxonomy Using Natural Language Processing A Preliminary Study
    Kusuma, Selvia Ferdiana
    Siahaan, Daniel
    Yuhana, Umi Laili
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION (ICITSI), 2015,
  • [38] Analysis of IELTS and TOEFL reading and listening tests in terms of Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
    Baghaei, Samira
    Bagheri, Mohammad Sadegh
    Yamini, Mortaza
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [39] Analysis of The Knowledge and Understanding Level of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Science Teachers in Banda Aceh in Constructing Exam Questions
    Yusrizal
    Rahmati
    JURNAL PENDIDIKAN FISIKA INDONESIA-INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS EDUCATION, 2021, 17 (01): : 72 - 76
  • [40] Crowdsourcing the Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions Using Item-Writing Flaws and Bloom's Taxonomy
    Moore, Steven
    Fang, Ellen
    Nguyen, Huy A.
    Stamper, John
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH ACM CONFERENCE ON LEARNING @ SCALE, L@S 2023, 2023, : 25 - 34