The Analysis of Chemistry Teachers Exam Questions in Regards to the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and Their Comparison with OSYM Questions

被引:0
|
作者
Yildirim, Tamer [1 ]
机构
[1] Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Univ, Canakkale, Turkey
关键词
Assessments; Bloom taxonomy; chemistry; examination; OSYM;
D O I
10.9779/pauefd.585602
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to analyze the exam questions prepared by chemistry teachers in accordance with the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy and to compare the cognitive levels assessed by the questions of the chemistry teachers in the study with the cognitive levels assessed by university entrance exam questions. The study is conducted using document analysis, which one of the qualitative research methods. The data consist of the exam questions (787 in total) prepared by chemistry teachers working in 5 different high schools in the center of Artvin province during the 2018-2019 educational year and chemistry questions in university entrance examination tests (207) within the course of 6 year period (2014-2019). The findings of the study suggest that in terms of cognitive processes dimension, nearly all of the questions of the chemistry teachers (%98) are in the lower cognitive process level and the students are asked from remembering, understanding and applying levels. In terms of knowledge dimension, it is found that that chemistry teachers mostly ask questions at the level of conceptual knowledge. When a comparison is made between the questions of university entrance exam questions and the questions asked by the chemistry teachers, we can see that university entrance exam questions mostly concentrate on conceptual knowledge questions whereas the questions of the chemistry teachers mostly concentrate on factual questions. Procedural knowledge questions are found to be at the same level in both groups. Metacognitive ability questions are never asked by both chemistry teachers and by the Student Selection and Placement Center. In regards to the cognitive processes dimension, it can be concluded the chemistry teachers ask more questions based on remembrance in written exams whereas in university entrance examinations, questions in understanding, applying and analysis levels are used more frequently.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 467
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EduQuestioning mobile learning application: a catalyst for developing HOTS-based assessment questions referring to Revised Bloom's Taxonomy
    Susantini, Endang
    Sari, Yurizka Melia
    Marzuqi, Muhammad Ilyas
    Asteria, Prima Vidya
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2025, 20
  • [22] Reframing Lower-Level Bloom's Taxonomy Exam Questions in Applied Anatomy Alters Statistical Outcomes for Item Performance: A Pilot Study
    Stevens, Kelsey
    Immonen, Jessica
    Dykstra, Emily
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [23] Text Mining Approach Using TF-IDF and Naive Bayes for Classification of Exam Questions Based on Cognitive Level of Bloom's Taxonomy
    Aninditya, Annisa
    Hasibuan, Muhammad Azani
    Sutoyo, Edi
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM (IOTAIS), 2019, : 112 - 117
  • [24] Incorporation of Bloom's Taxonomy into Multiple-Choice Examination Questions for a Pharmacotherapeutics Course
    Kim, Myo-Kyoung
    Patel, Rajul A.
    Uchizono, James A.
    Beck, Lynn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 76 (06)
  • [25] Automatic Classification of Questions based on Bloom's Taxonomy using Artificial Neural Network
    Ifham, Mohamed
    Banujan, Kuhaneswaran
    Kumara, B. T. G. S.
    Wijeratne, P. M. A. K.
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS (DASA), 2022, : 311 - 315
  • [26] USING BLOOM'S TAXONOMY TO COMPARE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXAMINATION QUESTIONS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
    Jones, Karl O.
    Harland, Janice
    Reid, Juliet M. V.
    Thayer, Tom
    Bartlett, Rebecca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND SECURITY, 2010, 2 (01): : 15 - 24
  • [27] Analysis of 2016 LYS and YGS Physics Questions According to Bloom Taxonomy and Outcomes in the Curriculum
    Ayvaci, Hakan Sevki
    Yamak, Suat
    Duru, Mehmet Kursad
    CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2018, 47 (02): : 798 - 832
  • [28] A COMBINATION METHOD OF SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC APPROACHES FOR CLASSIFYING EXAMINATION QUESTIONS INTO BLOOM'S TAXONOMY COGNITIVE
    Mohamed, Omar J.
    Zakar, Nawaf A.
    Alshaikhdeeb, Basel
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 (02) : 935 - 950
  • [29] Student Profile in Completing Questions Based on Cognitive Level of Bloom's Taxonomy By Anderson and Krathwohl
    Arlianty, Widinda Normalia
    Febriana, Beta Wulan
    Diniaty, Artina
    Fauzi'ah, Lina
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMISTRY, CHEMICAL PROCESS AND ENGINEERING (IC3PE), 2018, 2026
  • [30] ANALYSIS OF PRESERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS' QUESTIONING SKILLS ABOUT GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS ACCORDING TO BLOOM'S REVISED TAXONOMY
    Koc, I.
    Kuvac, M.
    ICERI2014: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2014, : 5774 - 5774