Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Kennedy, Sidney H. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning F. [2 ]
Thase, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Escitalopram; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; POOLED ANALYSIS; VENLAFAXINE XR; CONTINUATION TREATMENT; EXTENDED-RELEASE; REMISSION RATES; EFFICACY; CITALOPRAM;
D O I
10.1185/03007990802622726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relative antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram and comparator antidepressants. Research design and methods: A meta-analysis was performed using studies in major depressive disorder (MDD) comparing escitalopram with active controls, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] (venlafaxine, duloxetine). Adult patients had to meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the treatment difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 8. Secondary outcome measures were response and remission (MADRS total score <= 12) rates. Results: Individual patient data (N = 4549) from 16 randomized controlled trials were included in the analyses (escitalopram n = 2272, SSRIs n = 1750, SNRIs n = 527). Escitalopram was significantly more effective than comparators in overall treatment effect, with an estimated mean treatment difference of 1.1 points on the MADRS (p<0.0001), and in responder (63.7 vs. 58.3%, p<0.0001) and remitter (53.1 vs. 49.4%, p<0.0059) analyses. Escitalopram was significantly superior to SSRIs, with an estimated difference in response of 62.1 vs. 58.4% and remission of 51.6 vs. 49.0%. In comparison to SNRIs, the estimated difference in response was 68.3 vs. 59.0% (p < 0.0007) and for remission the difference was 57.8 vs. 50.5% (p = 0.0088). These results were similar for severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS >= 30). Sensitivity analyses were performed with data from articles reporting Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores. The 8-week withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 5.4% for escitalopram and 7.9% for the comparators (p<0.01). This difference was accounted for by statistically significant higher attrition rates in the SNRI comparisons. This work may be limited by the clinical methodology underlying meta-analytic studies, in particular, the exclusion of trials that fail to meet predetermined criteria for inclusion. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, superior efficacy of escitalopram compared to SSRIs and SNRIs was confirmed, although the superiority over SSRIs was largely explained by differences between escitalopram and citalopram.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Escitalopram versus venlafaxine XR in the treatment of major depressive disorder
    Montgomery, S.
    Andersen, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 9 : S233 - S233
  • [42] Escitalopram vs venlafaxine XR treatment of major depressive disorder
    Montgomery, SA
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 14 : S207 - S207
  • [43] Use of nitrous oxide in the treatment of major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis nitrous oxide in depressive disorders
    Rech, Peterson
    Custodio, Rodrigo Miranda
    Uggioni, Maria Laura Rodrigues
    Prestes, Gabriele Silveira
    Marcal, Fernanda
    Silveira, Vitoria Pedroso
    Dagostin, Valdemira Santina
    Colonetti, Tamy
    Rosa, Maria Ines
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 129
  • [44] A Markov cost-utility analysis of escitalopram and duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder
    Armstrong, Edward P.
    Malone, Daniel C.
    Erder, M. Haim
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (04) : 1115 - 1121
  • [45] Citalopram and escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials
    Li, Huafang
    Li, Ting
    Li, Guanjun
    Luo, Jianfeng
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 26 (04) : 281 - 287
  • [46] Cost effectiveness analysis of escitalopram compared to venlafaxine and fluvoxamine in treatment of major depressive disorder
    Xie, Feng
    Despiegel, Nicolas
    Danchenko, Natalya
    Hansen, Karina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 13 (01) : 59 - 69
  • [47] Meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic clinical decision support systems for the treatment of major depressive disorder
    Skryabin, Valentin
    Rozochkin, Ilya
    Zastrozhin, Mikhail
    Lauschke, Volker
    Franck, Johan
    Bryun, Evgeny
    Sychev, Dmitry
    PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (2-3): : 45 - 49
  • [48] The efficacy of vortioxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Berardelli, Isabella
    Rogante, Elena
    Formica, Federico
    Iannazzo, Riccardo
    Mammoliti, Attilio Valerio
    Riccioni, Raffaele
    Veizi, Skender
    Mcintyre, Roger S.
    Pompili, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 39 (02) : 92 - 105
  • [49] Adjunctive brexpiprazole for treating major depressive disorder, meta-analysis
    Yoon, S.
    Han, C.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 26 : S462 - S463
  • [50] Meta-analysis of problem solving therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder in older adults
    Kirkham, Julia G.
    Choi, Namkee
    Seitz, Dallas P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 31 (05) : 526 - 535