Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Kennedy, Sidney H. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning F. [2 ]
Thase, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Escitalopram; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; POOLED ANALYSIS; VENLAFAXINE XR; CONTINUATION TREATMENT; EXTENDED-RELEASE; REMISSION RATES; EFFICACY; CITALOPRAM;
D O I
10.1185/03007990802622726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relative antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram and comparator antidepressants. Research design and methods: A meta-analysis was performed using studies in major depressive disorder (MDD) comparing escitalopram with active controls, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] (venlafaxine, duloxetine). Adult patients had to meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the treatment difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 8. Secondary outcome measures were response and remission (MADRS total score <= 12) rates. Results: Individual patient data (N = 4549) from 16 randomized controlled trials were included in the analyses (escitalopram n = 2272, SSRIs n = 1750, SNRIs n = 527). Escitalopram was significantly more effective than comparators in overall treatment effect, with an estimated mean treatment difference of 1.1 points on the MADRS (p<0.0001), and in responder (63.7 vs. 58.3%, p<0.0001) and remitter (53.1 vs. 49.4%, p<0.0059) analyses. Escitalopram was significantly superior to SSRIs, with an estimated difference in response of 62.1 vs. 58.4% and remission of 51.6 vs. 49.0%. In comparison to SNRIs, the estimated difference in response was 68.3 vs. 59.0% (p < 0.0007) and for remission the difference was 57.8 vs. 50.5% (p = 0.0088). These results were similar for severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS >= 30). Sensitivity analyses were performed with data from articles reporting Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores. The 8-week withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 5.4% for escitalopram and 7.9% for the comparators (p<0.01). This difference was accounted for by statistically significant higher attrition rates in the SNRI comparisons. This work may be limited by the clinical methodology underlying meta-analytic studies, in particular, the exclusion of trials that fail to meet predetermined criteria for inclusion. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, superior efficacy of escitalopram compared to SSRIs and SNRIs was confirmed, although the superiority over SSRIs was largely explained by differences between escitalopram and citalopram.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of escitalopram and paroxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder
    Lin, Huang-Li
    Hsu, Ya-Ting
    Liu, Chia-Yih
    Chen, Chia-Hui
    Hsiao, Mei-Chun
    Liu, Yu-Li
    Shen, Winston W.
    Hsiao, Chin-Fu
    Liu, Shen-Ing
    Chang, Liang-Huey
    Tang, Hwa-Sheng
    Lai, Hsiang-Ling
    Lin, Pei-Sheng
    Lin, Keh-Ming
    Tsou, Hsiao-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 339 - 345
  • [22] Escitalopram in the treatment of diabetic patients with major depressive disorder
    Pollock, Bruce G.
    Bose, Anjana
    Gordon, John
    Li, Dayong
    Gandhi, Chetan
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 31 : S98 - S99
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder in Turkey
    Hemels, ME
    Karamustafyoglu, O
    Ozmen, E
    Dilsad, S
    Mene, S
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 392 - 392
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Germany
    Kulp, W
    Hemels, M
    Greiner, W
    Graf, VDJ
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (06) : A210 - A210
  • [25] Escitalopram and duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of two trials
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Andersen, Henning F.
    Wade, Alan G.
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 23 (04) : 181 - 187
  • [26] Theory of mind in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis
    Bora, Emre
    Berk, Michael
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 191 : 49 - 55
  • [27] Major depressive disorder in epilepsy clinics: A meta-analysis
    Kim, Minjung
    Kim, Young-Soo
    Kim, Do-Hyung
    Yang, Tae-Won
    Kwon, Oh-Young
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 84 : 56 - 69
  • [28] A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder
    Bylsma, Lauren M.
    Morris, Bethany H.
    Rottenberg, Jonathan
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 28 (04) : 676 - 691
  • [29] Rumination in major depressive and bipolar disorder - a meta-analysis
    Kovacs, Lilla Nora
    Takacs, Zsofia K.
    Toth, Zsofia
    Simon, Evelin
    Schmelowszky, Agoston
    Kokonyei, Gyongyi
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 276 : 1131 - 1141
  • [30] Meta-analysis of genetic studies in major depressive disorder
    Cecile, A.
    Janssens, J. W.
    Leon, Sandra Lopez
    Ladd, Angela M. Gonzalez-Zuloeta
    Del-Favero, Jurgen
    Claes, Stephan
    Oostra, Ben A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2006, 141B (07) : 693 - 693