Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Kennedy, Sidney H. [1 ]
Andersen, Henning F. [2 ]
Thase, Michael E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Escitalopram; Major depressive disorder; Meta-analysis; Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; POOLED ANALYSIS; VENLAFAXINE XR; CONTINUATION TREATMENT; EXTENDED-RELEASE; REMISSION RATES; EFFICACY; CITALOPRAM;
D O I
10.1185/03007990802622726
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relative antidepressant efficacy of escitalopram and comparator antidepressants. Research design and methods: A meta-analysis was performed using studies in major depressive disorder (MDD) comparing escitalopram with active controls, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] (citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline) and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs] (venlafaxine, duloxetine). Adult patients had to meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the treatment difference in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at week 8. Secondary outcome measures were response and remission (MADRS total score <= 12) rates. Results: Individual patient data (N = 4549) from 16 randomized controlled trials were included in the analyses (escitalopram n = 2272, SSRIs n = 1750, SNRIs n = 527). Escitalopram was significantly more effective than comparators in overall treatment effect, with an estimated mean treatment difference of 1.1 points on the MADRS (p<0.0001), and in responder (63.7 vs. 58.3%, p<0.0001) and remitter (53.1 vs. 49.4%, p<0.0059) analyses. Escitalopram was significantly superior to SSRIs, with an estimated difference in response of 62.1 vs. 58.4% and remission of 51.6 vs. 49.0%. In comparison to SNRIs, the estimated difference in response was 68.3 vs. 59.0% (p < 0.0007) and for remission the difference was 57.8 vs. 50.5% (p = 0.0088). These results were similar for severely depressed patients (baseline MADRS >= 30). Sensitivity analyses were performed with data from articles reporting Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) scores. The 8-week withdrawal rate due to adverse events was 5.4% for escitalopram and 7.9% for the comparators (p<0.01). This difference was accounted for by statistically significant higher attrition rates in the SNRI comparisons. This work may be limited by the clinical methodology underlying meta-analytic studies, in particular, the exclusion of trials that fail to meet predetermined criteria for inclusion. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, superior efficacy of escitalopram compared to SSRIs and SNRIs was confirmed, although the superiority over SSRIs was largely explained by differences between escitalopram and citalopram.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A cost-effectiveness analysis of escitalopram and sertraline in the treatment of major depressive disorder
    Armstrong, EP
    Skrepnek, GH
    Malone, DC
    Erder, H
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 393 - 393
  • [32] Treatment Rate for Major Depressive Disorder in China: a Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies
    Han Qi
    Qian-Qian Zong
    Grace K. I. Lok
    Wen-Wang Rao
    Feng-Rong An
    Gabor S. Ungvari
    Lloyd Balbuena
    Qing-E Zhang
    Yu-Tao Xiang
    Psychiatric Quarterly, 2019, 90 : 883 - 895
  • [33] Treatment Rate for Major Depressive Disorder in China: a Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies
    Qi, Han
    Zong, Qian-Qian
    Lok, Grace K. I.
    Rao, Wen-Wang
    An, Feng-Rong
    Ungvari, Gabor S.
    Balbuena, Lloyd
    Zhang, Qing-E
    Xiang, Yu-Tao
    PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2019, 90 (04) : 883 - 895
  • [34] Efficacy of adjunctive celecoxib treatment for patients with major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis
    Na, Kyoung-Sae
    Lee, Kang Joon
    Lee, Ji Sung
    Cho, Young Sung
    Jung, Han-Yong
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 48 : 79 - 85
  • [35] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vortioxetine for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults
    Zhang, Xinyan
    Cai, Yuchun
    Hu, Xiaowen
    Lu, Christine Y.
    Nie, Xiaoyan
    Shi, Luwen
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 13
  • [36] Combination of Antidepressants in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rocha, Fabio Lopes
    Fuzikawa, Cintia
    Riera, Rachel
    Hara, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 32 (02) : 278 - 281
  • [38] Escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder in adolescent patientsProfile report
    Lily P. H. Yang
    Lesley J. Scott
    CNS Drugs, 2010, 24 : 621 - 623
  • [39] Venlafaxine XR versus escitalopram treatment of major depressive disorder
    Zarra, J
    Schmidt, L
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 15 : S394 - S395
  • [40] Desvenlafaxine and escitalopram for the treatment of postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder
    Soares, Claudio N.
    Thase, Michael E.
    Clayton, Anita
    Guico-Pabia, Christine J.
    Focht, Kristen
    Jiang, Qin
    Kornstein, Susan G.
    Ninan, Phil
    Kane, Cecelia P.
    Cohen, Lee S.
    MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY, 2010, 17 (04): : 700 - 711