The impact of colonoscopy indication on polyp detection rate

被引:6
|
作者
Abu Baker, Fadi [1 ,2 ]
Mari, Amir [3 ,4 ]
Hosadurg, Deepash [5 ]
Suki, Muhammed [1 ,2 ]
Ovadia, Baruch [1 ,2 ]
Gal, Oren [1 ,2 ]
Kopelamn, Yael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hillel Yaffe Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Hadera, Israel
[2] Technion Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Nazareth EMMS Hosp, Gastroenterol, Nazareth, Israel
[4] Bar Illan Univ, Fac Med, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, London, England
来源
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2019年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Polyp detection rate; quality indicator; non-screening colonoscopy; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; POLYPECTOMY RATE; RISK; SURVEILLANCE; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.20524/aog.2019.0374
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Adenoma/polyp detection rates are considered to be among the most important quality indicators of colonoscopy and are key measures of a quality procedure. However, they are designed for use in the screening setting and are not amenable to other colonoscopy indications. Little is known about their significance in other colonoscopy indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the various indications on polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study. Electronic reports of index colonoscopy procedures with adequate bowel preparation over a 10-year period were reviewed. Patients were divided into 7 groups based on the study indication. PDR was determined for each group and was compared to that of a control group, the screening indication group. Adjustment was made for potential confounders such as age, sex, and procedural setting. Results A total of 13,054 patients were considered suitable for the study. PDR was greatest in the positive fecal occult blood test group, with a value of 33.1% (P<0.01). Overall, the remaining groups showed similar PDRs compared with screening (22.1% vs. 20.4%; P=0.15). This trend persisted in a multivariate analysis, which showed the odds ratio in the positive fecal occult blood test group to be significantly higher, with a value of 1.955 (1.759-2.172, P<0.001) compared with the screening group. Conclusion PDR was highest for the positive fecal occult blood test indication, but was not affected significantly by most indications. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and help calculate recommended thresholds for "overall" PDR.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 282
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient Tolerability of Bowel Preparation is Associated with Polyp Detection Rate During Colonoscopy
    Holt, Edward W.
    Yimam, Kidist K.
    Ma, Hanley
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Sundberg, Richard A.
    Verhille, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2014, 23 (02) : 135 - 140
  • [42] Evaluation of the Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate As a Valuable Colonoscopy Quality Parameter
    Ijspeert, Joep E.
    Van Doorn, Sascha C.
    Bastiaansen, Barbara A.
    Fockens, Paul
    Dekker, Evelien
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB208 - AB208
  • [43] Should Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rate be Added as a Marker for Colonoscopy Quality?
    Lee, Grace J.
    Karnes, William E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S120 - S121
  • [44] CUFFED COLONOSCOPY WITH AMPLIFEYE IMPROVES POLYP DETECTION RATE - A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY
    Sze, Shun Fung
    Cheung, Wing I.
    Hui, Yee Tak
    Lam, Ting Wa Jodis
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB75 - AB75
  • [45] AUTOMATIC POLYP DETECTION IN COLONOSCOPY VIDEOS
    Yuan, Zijie
    IzadyYazdanabadi, Mohammadhassan
    Mokkapati, Divya
    Panvalkar, Rujuta
    Shin, Jae Y.
    Tajbakhsh, Nima
    Gurudu, Suryakanth
    Liang, Jianming
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2017, 10133
  • [46] AI and Polyp Detection During Colonoscopy
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Menini, Maddalena
    Massimi, Davide
    Rizkala, Tommy
    De Sire, Roberto
    Alfarone, Ludovico
    Capogreco, Antonio
    Colombo, Matteo
    Maselli, Roberta
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Brandaleone, Luca
    Di Martino, Antonio
    Ramai, Daryl
    Repici, Alessandro
    Hassan, Cesare
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [47] Impact of Colonoscopy Difficulty on Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy
    Hughes, Brian R.
    Patel, Swati G.
    Jones, Blake
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S299 - S299
  • [48] The study on artificial intelligence (AI) colonoscopy in affecting the rate of polyp detection in colonoscopy: A single centre retrospective study
    Wong, Yuen Ting
    Tai, Tze Fung
    Wong, Ka Fai
    Leung, Siu Kee
    Lam, Shuk Man
    Wong, Shun Yi
    Lo, Yik Yu
    Yan, Kit Man
    Tam, Shuk Kwan
    Wong, Man Fan
    Chan, Hing Lung
    SURGICAL PRACTICE, 2022, 26 (02) : 115 - 119
  • [49] Association Between Polyp Detection Rate and Post-Colonoscopy Cancer Among Patients Undergoing Diagnostic Colonoscopy
    Gingold-Belfer, Rachel
    Boltin, Doron
    Sneh-Arbib, Orly
    Comaneshter, Doron
    Cohen, Arnon
    Flugelman, Anath
    Vilkin, Alex
    Niv, Yaron
    Keinan, Lital Boker
    Dotan, Iris
    Levi, Zohar
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01) : 202 - 204
  • [50] ESTABLISHING NEED FOR SERRATED POLYP DETECTION RATE AND ADVANCED ADENOMA DETECTION RATE BENCHMARKS AS QUALITY INDICATORS FOR SCREENING COLONOSCOPY
    Dalal, Shaman
    Desai, Aakash
    Twohig, Patrick
    Shah, Aun R.
    Kamionkowski, Sara
    Sandhu, Dalbir S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S1252 - S1252