The impact of colonoscopy indication on polyp detection rate

被引:6
|
作者
Abu Baker, Fadi [1 ,2 ]
Mari, Amir [3 ,4 ]
Hosadurg, Deepash [5 ]
Suki, Muhammed [1 ,2 ]
Ovadia, Baruch [1 ,2 ]
Gal, Oren [1 ,2 ]
Kopelamn, Yael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hillel Yaffe Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Hadera, Israel
[2] Technion Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Nazareth EMMS Hosp, Gastroenterol, Nazareth, Israel
[4] Bar Illan Univ, Fac Med, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, London, England
来源
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2019年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Polyp detection rate; quality indicator; non-screening colonoscopy; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; POLYPECTOMY RATE; RISK; SURVEILLANCE; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.20524/aog.2019.0374
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Adenoma/polyp detection rates are considered to be among the most important quality indicators of colonoscopy and are key measures of a quality procedure. However, they are designed for use in the screening setting and are not amenable to other colonoscopy indications. Little is known about their significance in other colonoscopy indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the various indications on polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study. Electronic reports of index colonoscopy procedures with adequate bowel preparation over a 10-year period were reviewed. Patients were divided into 7 groups based on the study indication. PDR was determined for each group and was compared to that of a control group, the screening indication group. Adjustment was made for potential confounders such as age, sex, and procedural setting. Results A total of 13,054 patients were considered suitable for the study. PDR was greatest in the positive fecal occult blood test group, with a value of 33.1% (P<0.01). Overall, the remaining groups showed similar PDRs compared with screening (22.1% vs. 20.4%; P=0.15). This trend persisted in a multivariate analysis, which showed the odds ratio in the positive fecal occult blood test group to be significantly higher, with a value of 1.955 (1.759-2.172, P<0.001) compared with the screening group. Conclusion PDR was highest for the positive fecal occult blood test indication, but was not affected significantly by most indications. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and help calculate recommended thresholds for "overall" PDR.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 282
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Polyp Detection Rate Can Replace the Adenoma Detection Rate to Assess the Yield of Colonoscopy in Current Practice
    Denis, Bernard
    Sauleau, Erik Andre
    Gendre, Isabelle
    Perrin, Philippe
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB326 - AB326
  • [32] Non-Neoplastic Polypectomy During Screening Colonoscopy: The Impact on Polyp Detection Rate (Pdr) and Its Correlation With Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)
    Atia, Mary A.
    Patel, Neal C.
    Ratuapli, Shiva K.
    Crowell, Michael D.
    Umar, Sarah B.
    Gurudu, Suryakanth
    Faigel, Douglas O.
    Leighton, Jonathan A.
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S199 - S199
  • [33] Impact of Hyoscine Bromide Use on Polyp Detection Rate During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Khan, Muhammad Yasir
    Dirweesh, Ahmed
    Siddiqui, Waqas Javed
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (04) : 295 - 304
  • [34] Impact of glycemic control on colonoscopy outcomes: bowel preparation and polyp detection
    Izzy, Manhal
    Changela, Kinesh
    Alhankawi, Dhuha
    Haeri, Nami Safai
    Shah, Sulay
    Jibara, Ghalib
    Anand, Sury
    Singhal, Shashideep
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 29 (03): : 332 - 335
  • [35] Simple feedback of colonoscopy performance improved the number of adenomas per colonoscopy and serrated polyp detection rate
    Toyoshima, Osamu
    Yoshida, Shuntaro
    Nishizawa, Toshihiro
    Yamakawa, Tadahiro
    Arano, Toru
    Isomura, Yoshihiro
    Kanazawa, Takamitsu
    Ando, Hidehiko
    Tsuji, Yosuke
    Koike, Kazuhiko
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (07) : E1032 - E1038
  • [36] TANDEM COLONOSCOPY TO DEFINE THE POLYP MISS-RATE OF COLONOSCOPY
    HIXSON, L
    FENNERTY, M
    SAMPLINER, R
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (02) : 210 - 211
  • [37] COLONOSOPY INDICATION IMPACTS CORRELATION BETWEEN OVERALL POLYP DETECTION RATE AS A SURROGATE FOR SCREENING ADENOMA DETECTION RATE
    Ma, Irvin
    Patel, Swati
    Jones, Blake
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB235 - AB236
  • [38] Factors Affecting Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate During Screening Colonoscopy
    Parikh, Malav P.
    Gupta, Niyati M.
    Muthukuru, Sujit
    Jobanputra, Yash
    Wadhwa, Vaibhav
    Lopez, Rocio
    Thota, Prashanthi N.
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 : S161 - S162
  • [39] POLYP DETECTION RATE OF CT COLONOGRAPHY, HOW DOES THIS COMPARE TO CONVENTIONAL COLONOSCOPY?
    Verma, A. M.
    Verma, R.
    Bridge, D. P.
    Roche, S.
    Robinson, R. J.
    GUT, 2011, 60 : A75 - A75
  • [40] Can We Measure the Learning Curve of Colonoscopy Using Polyp Detection Rate?
    Yoon, Jin Young
    Cha, Jae Myung
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 49 (01) : 6 - 7