The impact of colonoscopy indication on polyp detection rate

被引:6
|
作者
Abu Baker, Fadi [1 ,2 ]
Mari, Amir [3 ,4 ]
Hosadurg, Deepash [5 ]
Suki, Muhammed [1 ,2 ]
Ovadia, Baruch [1 ,2 ]
Gal, Oren [1 ,2 ]
Kopelamn, Yael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hillel Yaffe Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Hadera, Israel
[2] Technion Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Nazareth EMMS Hosp, Gastroenterol, Nazareth, Israel
[4] Bar Illan Univ, Fac Med, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, London, England
来源
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2019年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Polyp detection rate; quality indicator; non-screening colonoscopy; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; POLYPECTOMY RATE; RISK; SURVEILLANCE; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.20524/aog.2019.0374
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Adenoma/polyp detection rates are considered to be among the most important quality indicators of colonoscopy and are key measures of a quality procedure. However, they are designed for use in the screening setting and are not amenable to other colonoscopy indications. Little is known about their significance in other colonoscopy indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the various indications on polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study. Electronic reports of index colonoscopy procedures with adequate bowel preparation over a 10-year period were reviewed. Patients were divided into 7 groups based on the study indication. PDR was determined for each group and was compared to that of a control group, the screening indication group. Adjustment was made for potential confounders such as age, sex, and procedural setting. Results A total of 13,054 patients were considered suitable for the study. PDR was greatest in the positive fecal occult blood test group, with a value of 33.1% (P<0.01). Overall, the remaining groups showed similar PDRs compared with screening (22.1% vs. 20.4%; P=0.15). This trend persisted in a multivariate analysis, which showed the odds ratio in the positive fecal occult blood test group to be significantly higher, with a value of 1.955 (1.759-2.172, P<0.001) compared with the screening group. Conclusion PDR was highest for the positive fecal occult blood test indication, but was not affected significantly by most indications. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and help calculate recommended thresholds for "overall" PDR.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 282
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy: Impact of colonoscopy indication and endoscopist specialty
    He, E.
    Wu, J.
    Ly, C.
    Katelaris, P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 260 - 260
  • [22] Impact of high definition colonoscopy on polyp detection in a single centre
    Walshe, M.
    Boyle, M.
    Bennett, G.
    Kelleher, B.
    MacMathuna, P.
    Stewart, S.
    Leyden, J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 : S43 - S44
  • [23] THE IMPACT OF ENDOCUFF-ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY ON THE POLYP DETECTION RATE: A RANDOMIZED BACK- TO BACK STUDY
    Naguib, Mohamed
    Khairy, Ahmed
    Shehab, Hany
    Kassem, Abdel Meguid
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB546 - AB546
  • [24] Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rate as a Screening Colonoscopy Quality Metric
    Alomari, Mohammad
    Al Momani, Laith
    El Kurdi, Bara
    Khazaaleh, Shrouq
    Sarmini, Muhammad Talal
    Wadhwa, Vaibhav
    Thota, Prashanthi N.
    Sanaka, Madhusudhan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S151 - S151
  • [25] Colonoscopy Adenomatous Polyp Detection Rate in Patients With Inadequate Bowel Prep
    Flaherty, Dylan
    Winrich, Evan
    Eisa, Mohamed E.
    Poddar, Triparna
    Pooler, Amy
    Kong, Maiying
    Omer, Endashaw
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S170 - S170
  • [26] Wide-angle Colonoscopy significantly improves polyp detection rate
    Haringsma, J.
    Hot, Lieke
    Van, M. E. Leerdam
    Kuipers, E. J.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB310 - AB310
  • [27] Polyp detection rate during colonoscopy is correlated with quality of bowel preparation
    Cohen, Lawrence B.
    Kastenberg, David
    Lottes, Sandra R.
    Forbes, William P.
    Carter, Edwin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 101 (09): : S556 - S556
  • [28] Simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time increases polyp detection rate
    Taber, Andrew
    Romagnuolo, Joseph
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB80 - AB81
  • [29] Comparison of Polyp Detection Rate During Screening Colonoscopy Between Gastroenterologists and Surgeons and Association of Scope Withdrawal Time with Polyp Detection Rate
    Bansal, Pardeep
    Raza, Naeem
    Haider, Fyeza
    Komar, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 : S573 - S573
  • [30] Relationship between the polyp detection rate and the post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer rate
    Sastre-Lozano, Violeta
    Moran-Sanchez, Senador
    Garcia-Solano, Jose
    Conesa-Zamora, Pablo
    Ruiz-Merino, Guadalupe
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2019, 111 (08) : 598 - 602