The impact of colonoscopy indication on polyp detection rate

被引:6
|
作者
Abu Baker, Fadi [1 ,2 ]
Mari, Amir [3 ,4 ]
Hosadurg, Deepash [5 ]
Suki, Muhammed [1 ,2 ]
Ovadia, Baruch [1 ,2 ]
Gal, Oren [1 ,2 ]
Kopelamn, Yael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hillel Yaffe Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Hadera, Israel
[2] Technion Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Nazareth EMMS Hosp, Gastroenterol, Nazareth, Israel
[4] Bar Illan Univ, Fac Med, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, London, England
来源
ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2019年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
Polyp detection rate; quality indicator; non-screening colonoscopy; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; QUALITY INDICATORS; POLYPECTOMY RATE; RISK; SURVEILLANCE; PROTECTION;
D O I
10.20524/aog.2019.0374
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Adenoma/polyp detection rates are considered to be among the most important quality indicators of colonoscopy and are key measures of a quality procedure. However, they are designed for use in the screening setting and are not amenable to other colonoscopy indications. Little is known about their significance in other colonoscopy indications. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the various indications on polyp detection rate (PDR). Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study. Electronic reports of index colonoscopy procedures with adequate bowel preparation over a 10-year period were reviewed. Patients were divided into 7 groups based on the study indication. PDR was determined for each group and was compared to that of a control group, the screening indication group. Adjustment was made for potential confounders such as age, sex, and procedural setting. Results A total of 13,054 patients were considered suitable for the study. PDR was greatest in the positive fecal occult blood test group, with a value of 33.1% (P<0.01). Overall, the remaining groups showed similar PDRs compared with screening (22.1% vs. 20.4%; P=0.15). This trend persisted in a multivariate analysis, which showed the odds ratio in the positive fecal occult blood test group to be significantly higher, with a value of 1.955 (1.759-2.172, P<0.001) compared with the screening group. Conclusion PDR was highest for the positive fecal occult blood test indication, but was not affected significantly by most indications. Further randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and help calculate recommended thresholds for "overall" PDR.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 282
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Indication for Colonoscopy Significantly Impacts the Polyp Detection Rate When Measuring the Withdraw Time
    Li, Shilun
    Spencer, Michael
    Perkins, Andrea
    Noy, Holly
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S134 - S134
  • [2] Adenoma and Polyp Detection Rates in Colonoscopy according to Indication
    Boroff, Erika S.
    Disbrow, Molly
    Crowell, Michael D.
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2017, 2017
  • [3] The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex
    Vojtechova, Gabriela
    Ngo, Ondrej
    Grega, Tomas
    Kmochova, Klara
    Voska, Michal
    Buckova, Barbora
    Majek, Ondrej
    Zavoral, Miroslav
    Suchanek, Stepan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2020, 29 (04) : 294 - 302
  • [4] Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?
    Yang, Phillip F.
    Wong, Shing W.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (02): : 156 - 161
  • [5] Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost
    Atia, Mary A.
    Patel, Neal C.
    Ratuapli, Shiva K.
    Boroff, Erika S.
    Crowell, Michael D.
    Gurudu, Suryakanth R.
    Faigel, Douglas O.
    Leighton, Jonathan A.
    Ramirez, Francisco C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (02) : 370 - +
  • [6] The factors affecting polyp detection rate on the timing of colonoscopy
    Kim, J. H.
    Song, M. K.
    Park, C. W.
    Yoo, Y. S.
    Kang, H. W.
    Lee, J. K.
    Koh, M. S.
    Lee, J. H.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 129 - 129
  • [7] Polyp detection rate as a marker of quality in colonoscopy in Australia
    Elangovan, H.
    De Barros, M.
    Taylor, A.
    O'Connor, S.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 : 218 - 219
  • [8] Is polyp detection rate a suitable surrogate measure for adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy?
    Javanmard-Emamghissi, Hannah
    Perry, Isabel
    Deb, Rahul
    Tierney, Gillian
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [9] The Factors Affecting Polyp Detection Rate on the Timing of Colonoscopy
    Kim, Jae Hak
    Song, Min Keun
    Park, Chang Wook
    Yoo, Yung Suk
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    Koh, Moon Soo
    Lee, Jin Ho
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S563 - S564
  • [10] Usefulness of Polyp Detection Rate as a Quality Indicator in Colonoscopy
    Lee, Su Hee
    Park, Dong Il
    Sung, Jun Mo
    Jang, Jae Hyun
    Ryu, Seung Ho
    Kim, Young Ho
    Lee, Suck-Ho
    Lee, Chang Kyun
    Eun, Chang Soo
    Han, Dong Soo
    INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2011, 9 (02) : 105 - 111