Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts

被引:38
|
作者
Tubbing, Alice [1 ]
Shaw-Jackson, Chloe [1 ]
Ameye, Lieveke [2 ]
Colin, Jerome [1 ]
Rozenberg, Serge [1 ]
Autin, Candice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Gynaecol, CHU St Pierre, Rue Haute 322, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Ctr Data, Inst Jules Bordet, Rue Heger Bordet 1, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Blastocyst; Vitrification; Day; 5; 6; Live births; Assisted reproduction; FROZEN EMBRYO-TRANSFER; TRANSFER CYCLES; VITRIFICATION; IMPLANTATION; PREGNANCY; RATES; CRYOPRESERVATION; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-017-1097-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose An investigation into the clinical implications of delayed blastulation (day 5 versus day 6) was carried out for cryo cycles, as heterogeneous results persist in the current literature. Methods We performed a retrospective study comparing clinical pregnancies and live births between 178 blastocysts vitrified and warmed on day 5 versus 149 on day 6. The stage of blastocyst development was taken into account and adjustment for confounding factors was performed. Results Our results demonstrate a significant difference in clinical pregnancy (43 versus 23% p value < 0.001) and live birth rates (34 versus 16% p value < 0.001) regarding the day of vitrification, in favour of day 5. This difference persisted after adjustment for confounding factors. The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancies and deliveries for the day 5 group compared to that of the day 6 group was 2.83 (95% CI, 1.48 to 5.41) and 2.94 (95% CI, 1.39 to 6.22), respectively. When the stage of development of the blastocyst was taken into consideration, we still observed a significant advantage of day 5 versus day 6 vitrification. Conclusions Day of vitrification (day 5 versus day 6) appears to be an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Stratification of our cohort was carried out according to the developmental stage, and significant differences persisted. Although the transfer of day 6 cryopreserved embryos remains a viable option, giving priority to a day 5 embryo would reduce the time to pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 424
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Birth of a healthy male infant after transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts derived from intracytoplasmic sperm injection with vitrified-warmed oocytes and frozen-thawed spermatozoa
    Koichi Kyono
    Yukiko Nakajo
    Masakazu Doshida
    Mayumi Toya
    Yasuhisa Araki
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2009, 26 : 451 - 453
  • [32] What are pregnancy chances after the transfer of day 5 vitrified/warmed compacted morulae and early blastocysts as compared to late blastocyst?
    Montjean, D.
    Pauly, V.
    Anzola, A. Beltran
    Gervoise-Boyer, M. J.
    Geoffroy-Siraudin, C.
    Boyer, P.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 192 - 192
  • [33] Birth of a healthy male infant after transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts derived from intracytoplasmic sperm injection with vitrified-warmed oocytes and frozen-thawed spermatozoa
    Kyono, Koichi
    Nakajo, Yukiko
    Doshida, Masakazu
    Toya, Mayumi
    Araki, Yasuhisa
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2009, 26 (08) : 451 - 453
  • [34] SUITABLE TIMING TO TRANSFER BLASTOCYSTS VITRIFIED ON DAY 6 IN FROZEN-THAWED CYCLES MAY BE DAY 5, NOT DAY 6.
    Xu, Huiling
    Qiu, Shumin
    Zheng, Beihong
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E160 - E161
  • [35] Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers
    Roy, Tammie K.
    Bradley, Cara K.
    Bowman, Mark C.
    McArthur, Steven J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (05) : 1294 - U26
  • [36] Effect of embryo transfer difficulty on live birth rates studied in vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers
    Alvarez, Manuel
    Martinez, Francisca
    Bourroul, Filipe M.
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Sole, Miquel
    Parriego, Monica
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Barri, Pedro N.
    Coroleu, Buenaventura
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 39 (06) : 940 - 946
  • [37] To collapse or not to collapse blastocysts before vitrification? A matched case-control study on single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers
    Kovacic, B.
    Taborin, M.
    Vlaisavljevic, V.
    Reljic, M.
    Knez, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 249 - 249
  • [38] ONGOING PREGNANCY RATE OF VITRIFIED-WARMED BLASTOCYST TRANSFERS IN AUTOLOGOUS PATIENTS: SINGLE VS DOUBLE TRANSFER ACCORDING TO THE DAY OF DEVELOPMENT.
    Liebermann, Juergen
    Sanchez-Julias, Sara
    Brohammer, Rebecca
    Schwab, Janna
    Uhler, Meike L.
    Hirshfeld-Cytron, Jennifer E.
    Sipe, Christopher
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (03) : E148 - E149
  • [39] To collapse or not to collapse blastocysts before vitrification? A matched case-control study on single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers
    Kovacic, Borut
    Taborin, Marjan
    Vlaisavljevic, Veljko
    Reljic, Milan
    Knez, Jure
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (04) : 669 - 678
  • [40] Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program
    Yerushalmi, G. M.
    Shavit, T.
    Avraham, S.
    Youngster, M.
    Kedem, A.
    Gat, I
    Dorofeyeva, U. S.
    Mashiach, S.
    Schiff, E.
    Shulman, A.
    Seidman, D. S.
    Wiser, A.
    Maman, E.
    Hourvitz, A.
    Baum, M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)