Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts

被引:38
|
作者
Tubbing, Alice [1 ]
Shaw-Jackson, Chloe [1 ]
Ameye, Lieveke [2 ]
Colin, Jerome [1 ]
Rozenberg, Serge [1 ]
Autin, Candice [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Gynaecol, CHU St Pierre, Rue Haute 322, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Ctr Data, Inst Jules Bordet, Rue Heger Bordet 1, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Blastocyst; Vitrification; Day; 5; 6; Live births; Assisted reproduction; FROZEN EMBRYO-TRANSFER; TRANSFER CYCLES; VITRIFICATION; IMPLANTATION; PREGNANCY; RATES; CRYOPRESERVATION; METAANALYSIS; OUTCOMES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-017-1097-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose An investigation into the clinical implications of delayed blastulation (day 5 versus day 6) was carried out for cryo cycles, as heterogeneous results persist in the current literature. Methods We performed a retrospective study comparing clinical pregnancies and live births between 178 blastocysts vitrified and warmed on day 5 versus 149 on day 6. The stage of blastocyst development was taken into account and adjustment for confounding factors was performed. Results Our results demonstrate a significant difference in clinical pregnancy (43 versus 23% p value < 0.001) and live birth rates (34 versus 16% p value < 0.001) regarding the day of vitrification, in favour of day 5. This difference persisted after adjustment for confounding factors. The adjusted odds ratio for clinical pregnancies and deliveries for the day 5 group compared to that of the day 6 group was 2.83 (95% CI, 1.48 to 5.41) and 2.94 (95% CI, 1.39 to 6.22), respectively. When the stage of development of the blastocyst was taken into consideration, we still observed a significant advantage of day 5 versus day 6 vitrification. Conclusions Day of vitrification (day 5 versus day 6) appears to be an independent predictor of clinical outcomes. Stratification of our cohort was carried out according to the developmental stage, and significant differences persisted. Although the transfer of day 6 cryopreserved embryos remains a viable option, giving priority to a day 5 embryo would reduce the time to pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 424
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program
    G. M. Yerushalmi
    T. Shavit
    S. Avraham
    M. Youngster
    A. Kedem
    I. Gat
    U. S. Dorofeyeva
    S. Mashiach
    E. Schiff
    A. Shulman
    D. S. Seidman
    A. Wiser
    E. Maman
    A. Hourvitz
    M. Baum
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [42] Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts
    Taylor, Tyl H.
    Patrick, Jennifer L.
    Gitlin, Susan A.
    Wilson, J. Michael
    Crain, Jack L.
    Griffin, Darren K.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 29 (03) : 305 - 310
  • [43] Comparisons of cumulative live birth rates after embryo transfers at day 2/3 versus day 5/6: a French national study
    Fauque, Patricia
    Zebina, Audrey Marchand
    Epelboin, Sylvie
    Coutinho, Ana Rita
    Charbonnier, Thomas
    Mansouri, Imene
    Gane, Jessica
    Ducreux, Bastien
    Jonveaux, Philippe
    Guerif, Fabrice
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 49 (06)
  • [44] Impact of Day 7 Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetric and Perinatal Outcome of Singletons Born After Vitrified-Warmed Embryo Transfer
    Huang, Jiaan
    Yang, Xiaoyan
    Wu, Jiayi
    Kuang, Yanping
    Wang, Yun
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [45] Morphology of vitrified/warmed day-5 embryos predicts rates of implantation, pregnancy and live birth
    Ebner, T.
    Vanderzwalmen, P.
    Shebl, O.
    Urdl, W.
    Moser, M.
    Zech, N. H.
    Tews, G.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 19 (01) : 72 - 78
  • [46] Comparison of two mainstream endometrial preparation regimens in vitrified-warmed embryo transfers after PGT
    Fu, Yu
    Chen, Dongjia
    Cai, Bing
    Xu, Yan
    Zhu, Shuhua
    Ding, Chenhui
    Wang, Yali
    Wang, Jing
    Li, Rong
    Guo, Jing
    Pan, Jiafu
    Zeng, Yanhong
    Zhong, Yiping
    Shen, Xiaoting
    Zhou, Canquan
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (02) : 239 - 246
  • [47] Noneffectiveness of cryostorage duration on clinical and neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers
    Baatarsuren, Mungunshagai
    Jamiyansuren, Jambaldorj
    Ganbaatar, Chinzorig
    Sengebaljir, Davaakhuu
    Erdenekhuyag, Belguune
    Enkhbaatar, Sandag
    Mungunsuvd, Namsrai
    Baljinnyam, Lkhagvasuren
    Tumur-Ochir, Ganjiguur
    Amarsaikhan, Ariunaa
    Dorjpurev, Amarjargal
    Ganbat, Gereltsetseg
    Boris, Tsogzolmaa
    Khangarid, Azjargal
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [48] Transport of vitrified-warmed ICSI blastocysts in straws for up to 5 hours does not affect the pregnancy rate
    Spanner, J.
    Pedersen, J.
    Lorenzen, E.
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 113
  • [49] Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7
    Hiraoka, K.
    Hiraoka, K.
    Miyazaki, M.
    Fukunaga, E.
    Horiuchi, T.
    Kusuda, T.
    Okano, S.
    Kinutani, M.
    Kinutani, K.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I60 - I60
  • [50] Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6
    Haas, Jigal
    Meriano, Jim
    Laskin, Carl
    Bentov, Yaakov
    Barzilay, Eran
    Casper, Robert F.
    Cadesky, Ken
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2016, 33 (12) : 1553 - 1557