Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers

被引:119
|
作者
Roy, Tammie K. [1 ]
Bradley, Cara K. [1 ]
Bowman, Mark C. [1 ]
McArthur, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Genea, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
关键词
Assisted reproduction; blastocyst; human; single-embryo transfer; vitrification; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; HUMAN ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY; OVARIAN STIMULATION; VITRIFICATION; PREGNANCY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CYCLES; TECHNOLOGY; EXPRESSION; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.046
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after fresh and vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfers. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. Patient(s): 1,209 infertile patients who underwent a total of 1,157 fresh and 645 vitrified-warmed embryo transfers. Intervention(s): Day-5 single-blastocyst transfers using fresh or vitrified-warmed (Cryotop method) grade I and grade II embryos. Main Outcome Measure(s): Fetal heart pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, gestational age, and live-birth weight. Result(s): The overall blastocyst thaw survival rate was 94.4% and was not significantly different between blastocyst grades or developmental stages. Similar clinical outcomes were achieved for fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers; for example, grade I blastocysts had a live-birth rate of 52.8% versus 55.3%, respectively, and grade II blastocysts had a rate of 34.9% versus 30.4%, respectively. Significantly improved neonatal outcomes were evident for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers for gestational age, being on average 0.3 weeks longer, and for live-birth weight with babies born on average 145 g heavier (3,296 g versus 3,441 g for fresh and vitrified-warmed groups, respectively), as compared with fresh transfers. Conclusion(s): Embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / U26
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Vitrified-warmed single-embryo transfers may be associated with increased maternal complications compared with fresh single-embryo transfers
    Shavit, Tal
    Oron, Galia
    Weon-Young, Son
    Holzer, Hananel
    Tulandi, Togas
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 35 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [2] Effect of embryo transfer difficulty on live birth rates studied in vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfers
    Alvarez, Manuel
    Martinez, Francisca
    Bourroul, Filipe M.
    Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
    Sole, Miquel
    Parriego, Monica
    Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Barri, Pedro N.
    Coroleu, Buenaventura
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 39 (06) : 940 - 946
  • [3] Vitrified-warmed embryo transfer is associated with mean higher singleton birth weight compared to fresh embryo transfer
    Beyer, Daniel Alexander
    Griesinger, Georg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 203 : 104 - 107
  • [4] Cumulative Live-Birth Rates in a Trial of Single-Embryo or Double-Embryo Transfer
    Thurin-Kjellberg, Ann
    Olivius, Catharina
    Bergh, Christina
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (18): : 1812 - 1813
  • [5] Time-lapse KIDScoreD5 for prediction of embryo pregnancy potential in fresh and vitrified-warmed single-embryo transfers
    Tartia, Alina P.
    Wu, Clara Q.
    Gale, Jenna
    Shmorgun, Doron
    Leveille, Marie-Claude
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [6] Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer
    Feng, Guixue
    Zhang, Bo
    Zhou, Hong
    Shu, Jinhui
    Gan, Xianyou
    Wu, Fangrong
    Deng, Xihe
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2012, 25 (05) : 466 - 473
  • [7] The euploid blastocysts produced after either follicularphase or luteal-phase-stimulation show similar live-birth rates: a prospective multicenter study including 293 vitrified-warmed single-embryo-transfers
    Vaiarelli, A.
    Cimadomo, D.
    Colamaria, S.
    Trabucco, E.
    Sansone, A.
    Alviggi, E.
    Della Ragione, A.
    Golia, F.
    Florini, F.
    Barnocchi, N.
    Papini, L.
    Conforti, A.
    Alviggi, C.
    Rienzi, L.
    Ubaldi, F. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 2 - 2
  • [8] Transfer of day 4 vitrified-warmed embryos yields equally good clinical outcomes as compared to blastocysts vitrified on days 5 or 6
    Menezes, J.
    Lalitkumar, P. G. L.
    Borg, P.
    Vaegter, K.
    Wramsby, M.
    Wramsby, H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 3 - 3
  • [9] COMPLETE ZONA REMOVAL USING LASER ASSISTED HATCHING FOR VITRIFIED-WARMED DAY 6 BLASTOCYSTS INCREASED CLINICAL PREGNANCY AND LIVE BIRTH RATES FOLLOWING SINGLE VITRIFIED-WARMED BLASTOCYST TRANSFER.
    Ueno, S.
    Uchiyama, K.
    Okimura, T.
    Yabuuchi, A.
    Okuno, T.
    Kobayashi, T.
    Kato, K.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E172 - E172
  • [10] Maternal and neonatal outcomes following blastocyst biopsy for PGT in single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer cycles
    Hao, Yongxiu
    Long, Xiaoyu
    Kong, Fei
    Chen, Lixue
    Chi, Hongbin
    Zhu, Xiaohui
    Kuo, Ying
    Zhu, Yiru
    Jia, Jialin
    Yan, Liying
    Li, Rong
    Liu, Ping
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Qiao, Jie
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (01) : 151 - 162