Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing Techniques in Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Shiraz, Salman [1 ]
Shujauddin, Mohammad [2 ]
Hasan, Khalid [3 ]
Elramadi, Ahmed [4 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [5 ]
机构
[1] Christine M Kleinert Inst, Orthopaed, Louisville, KY USA
[2] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Orthopaed, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[5] Hamad Med Corpora, Orthoped, Doha, Qatar
关键词
postoperative outcomes; comparison between two surgical procedures; proximal femoral nail; dynamic hip screw fixation; stable intertrochanteric fracture; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; ANTIROTATION; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33366
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionDynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) are two well-accepted modes of surgical treatments for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. While studies have extensively explored the efficacy of one over the other in unstable fractures, the comparison is sparsely available for stable fractures. The main aim of this study is to compare DHS or PFN corrective surgeries in cases of stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective data review of all stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018. Data were extracted from electronic medical CERNER records, including demographics, clinical notes, operative reports, radiographs, and imaging reports. Data review was followed by prospective data collection via phone about the current post-operative functional status of all cases. Data analysis was done on SPSS v.23. Study was approved by Medical Research Center (MRC) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). Study Protocol ID: MRC-01-19-108ResultsOut of 62 stable IT fractures operated at our center during the study period, 42 underwent DHS correction, while 20 had PFN. The mean age of the studied cohort was 66.56 years (+/- 15.95). Males were twice more than females. The mean duration of surgery was 83.73 minutes for DHS and 120.25 minutes for PFN. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Differences in intraoperative blood loss, duration between fracture and surgery, and length of hospital stay were all statistically insignificant. Patients who underwent PFN showed a higher frequency of return to ambulation (assisted and unassisted), while the number of patients with DHS was less for the functional outcome. Similarly, more post-PFN radiographs displayed union than post-DHS radiographs (55% and 38%, respectively). This difference was statistically insignificant.ConclusionOur study showed promising results for stable IT fractures treated with PFN. However, more data and prospective observational studies are required to establish more statistically significant results.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computational modeling in the prediction of Dynamic Hip Screw failure in proximal femoral fractures
    Hrubina, Maros
    Horak, Zdenek
    Bartoska, Radek
    Navratil, Leos
    Rosina, Jozef
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMEDICINE, 2013, 11 (03) : 143 - 151
  • [42] Comparison of soft-tissue serum markers in stable intertrochanteric fracture: Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail-A preliminary study
    Hong, Jae-Young
    Suh, Seung-Woo
    Park, Jung-Ho
    Shin, Young-Soo
    Yoon, Jung-Ro
    Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (02): : 204 - 208
  • [43] Nailing of Displaced Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
    Schlickewei, Carsten W.
    Rueger, Johannes M.
    Ruecker, Andreas H.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 30 (02) : 70 - 86
  • [44] Dynamic hip screw blade fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures Reply
    Fang, Christian
    Leung, Frankie
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (01) : 133 - 133
  • [45] Comparison of Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation with Dynamic Hip Screw and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Techniques
    Emami, Mohamad
    Manafi, Alireza
    Hashemi, Behrooz
    Nemati, Ali
    Safari, Saeed
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2013, 1 (01): : 14 - 17
  • [46] A COMPARISON OF SLIDE SCREW PLATE FIXATION AND ENDER NAILING OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES
    HAY, MC
    BELL, J
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1981, 63 (03): : 464 - 464
  • [47] Femoral shortening in intertrochanteric fractures - A comparison between the Medoff sliding plate and the compression hip screw
    Olsson, O
    Ceder, L
    Hauggaard, A
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (04): : 572 - 578
  • [48] Biomechanical Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw, Proximal Femoral Nail, Cannulated Screw, and Monoaxial External Fixation in the Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
    Imren, Y.
    Gurkan, V.
    Bilsel, K.
    Desteli, E. E.
    Tuna, M.
    Gurcan, C.
    Tuncay, I.
    Sen, C.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2015, 82 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [49] 386 Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) In Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur -A Comparative Clinical Study
    Dubey, V
    Spiegelberg, B.
    Shahane, S.
    Samant, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [50] Comparison of the Dynamic Hip Screw with the Dynamic Hip External Fixator for Intertrochanteric Fractures: Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Moradi, Ali
    Moradi, Meisam
    Emadzadeh, Maryam
    Bagheri, Farshid
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2021, 9 (06): : 662 - 673