Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing Techniques in Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Shiraz, Salman [1 ]
Shujauddin, Mohammad [2 ]
Hasan, Khalid [3 ]
Elramadi, Ahmed [4 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [5 ]
机构
[1] Christine M Kleinert Inst, Orthopaed, Louisville, KY USA
[2] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Orthopaed, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[5] Hamad Med Corpora, Orthoped, Doha, Qatar
关键词
postoperative outcomes; comparison between two surgical procedures; proximal femoral nail; dynamic hip screw fixation; stable intertrochanteric fracture; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; ANTIROTATION; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33366
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionDynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) are two well-accepted modes of surgical treatments for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. While studies have extensively explored the efficacy of one over the other in unstable fractures, the comparison is sparsely available for stable fractures. The main aim of this study is to compare DHS or PFN corrective surgeries in cases of stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective data review of all stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018. Data were extracted from electronic medical CERNER records, including demographics, clinical notes, operative reports, radiographs, and imaging reports. Data review was followed by prospective data collection via phone about the current post-operative functional status of all cases. Data analysis was done on SPSS v.23. Study was approved by Medical Research Center (MRC) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). Study Protocol ID: MRC-01-19-108ResultsOut of 62 stable IT fractures operated at our center during the study period, 42 underwent DHS correction, while 20 had PFN. The mean age of the studied cohort was 66.56 years (+/- 15.95). Males were twice more than females. The mean duration of surgery was 83.73 minutes for DHS and 120.25 minutes for PFN. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Differences in intraoperative blood loss, duration between fracture and surgery, and length of hospital stay were all statistically insignificant. Patients who underwent PFN showed a higher frequency of return to ambulation (assisted and unassisted), while the number of patients with DHS was less for the functional outcome. Similarly, more post-PFN radiographs displayed union than post-DHS radiographs (55% and 38%, respectively). This difference was statistically insignificant.ConclusionOur study showed promising results for stable IT fractures treated with PFN. However, more data and prospective observational studies are required to establish more statistically significant results.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic hip screw blade fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures
    Dhamangaonkar, Anoop C.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (01) : 132 - 133
  • [32] Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) In Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur -A Comparative Clinical Study
    Dubey, V.
    Spiegelberg, B.
    Shahane, S.
    Samant, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 72 - 72
  • [33] Dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of two fixation methods
    Yih-Shiunn Lee
    Hui-Ling Huang
    Ting-Ying Lo
    Chien-Rae Huang
    International Orthopaedics, 2007, 31 : 683 - 688
  • [34] THE MANAGEMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF FEMUR BY DYNAMIC HIP SCREW
    Singh, Arvinder
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (74): : 15575 - 15579
  • [35] Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Shen, L.
    Zhang, Y.
    Shen, Y.
    Cui, Z.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (04) : 377 - 383
  • [36] Dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of two fixation methods
    Lee, Yih-Shiunn
    Huang, Hui-Ling
    Lo, Ting-Ying
    Huang, Chien-Rae
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 31 (05) : 683 - 688
  • [37] Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly
    Harrington, P
    Nihal, A
    Singhania, AK
    Howell, FR
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [38] Clinical Outcome Following Treatment of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures with Dynamic Hip Screw
    Setiobudi, Tony
    Ng, Yau Hong
    Lim, Chin Tat
    Liang, Shen
    Lee, Kevin
    Das De, Shamal
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2011, 40 (11) : 482 - 487
  • [39] Clinical Outcome Following Treatment of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures with Dynamic Hip Screw
    Haq, Rehan Ul
    Dhammi, Ish K.
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2012, 41 (06) : 275 - 276
  • [40] A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RECONSTRUCTION NAILING VERSUS DYNAMIC HIP SCREW DEVICE IN THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES
    Reddy, Pereddy Somashekhara
    Ponugoti, Nikhil
    Jampana, Venkata S.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (99): : 7224 - 7230