Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing Techniques in Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Shiraz, Salman [1 ]
Shujauddin, Mohammad [2 ]
Hasan, Khalid [3 ]
Elramadi, Ahmed [4 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [5 ]
机构
[1] Christine M Kleinert Inst, Orthopaed, Louisville, KY USA
[2] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Orthopaed, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[5] Hamad Med Corpora, Orthoped, Doha, Qatar
关键词
postoperative outcomes; comparison between two surgical procedures; proximal femoral nail; dynamic hip screw fixation; stable intertrochanteric fracture; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; ANTIROTATION; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33366
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionDynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) are two well-accepted modes of surgical treatments for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. While studies have extensively explored the efficacy of one over the other in unstable fractures, the comparison is sparsely available for stable fractures. The main aim of this study is to compare DHS or PFN corrective surgeries in cases of stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective data review of all stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018. Data were extracted from electronic medical CERNER records, including demographics, clinical notes, operative reports, radiographs, and imaging reports. Data review was followed by prospective data collection via phone about the current post-operative functional status of all cases. Data analysis was done on SPSS v.23. Study was approved by Medical Research Center (MRC) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). Study Protocol ID: MRC-01-19-108ResultsOut of 62 stable IT fractures operated at our center during the study period, 42 underwent DHS correction, while 20 had PFN. The mean age of the studied cohort was 66.56 years (+/- 15.95). Males were twice more than females. The mean duration of surgery was 83.73 minutes for DHS and 120.25 minutes for PFN. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Differences in intraoperative blood loss, duration between fracture and surgery, and length of hospital stay were all statistically insignificant. Patients who underwent PFN showed a higher frequency of return to ambulation (assisted and unassisted), while the number of patients with DHS was less for the functional outcome. Similarly, more post-PFN radiographs displayed union than post-DHS radiographs (55% and 38%, respectively). This difference was statistically insignificant.ConclusionOur study showed promising results for stable IT fractures treated with PFN. However, more data and prospective observational studies are required to establish more statistically significant results.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of percutaneous compression plating and dynamic hip screw for treating femoral intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients
    Shi, Jun
    Ji, Dongdong
    Gao, Aiguo
    Feng, Dehong
    Zhao, Quanming
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (04): : 4300 - 4305
  • [22] A Comparison of Hemiarthroplasty versus Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation for Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Systematic Review.
    Ji, C.
    Chowdhury, A.
    Edwards, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 107 - 107
  • [23] A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Thusoo, Varun
    Nehru, Ashish
    Kudyar, Sachin
    Chakrapani, Arjun S.
    Saini, Eshaan Singh
    Alok, K., V
    Narender, D.
    Philip, Suraj
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Jana, Kanailal
    Jha, Dipak Kumar
    Chakraburtty, Tapas
    Mullick, Sunny Kumar
    Duttagupta, Swarnava
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (07) : 71 - 74
  • [25] Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Cong
    Chen, Zhangxin
    Wang, Mengyuan
    Chen, Wei
    Ding, Zhenqi
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (06) : E32920
  • [26] Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis for Proximal Femoral Fractures in Patients with Coxarthrosis
    Hrubina, M.
    Skotak, M.
    Letocha, J.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2015, 82 (05) : 364 - 368
  • [27] Comparative evaluation of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Mustamsir, Edi
    Aji, Aulia P.
    Fernando, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (04) : 35 - 48
  • [28] Distal unlocked proximal femoral intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures
    Ozkan, Korhan
    Unay, Koray
    Demircay, Can
    Cakir, Mustafa
    Eceviz, Engin
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 1397 - 1400
  • [29] Distal unlocked proximal femoral intramedullary nailing for intertrochanteric femur fractures
    Korhan Ozkan
    Koray Unay
    Can Demircay
    Mustafa Cakir
    Engin Eceviz
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33
  • [30] Dynamic hip screw blade fixation for intertrochanteric hip fractures
    Leung, Frankie
    Gudushauri, Paata
    Yuen, Grace
    Lau, Tak-Wing
    Fang, Christian
    Chow, Shew-Ping
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2012, 20 (03): : 302 - 306