Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing Techniques in Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Shiraz, Salman [1 ]
Shujauddin, Mohammad [2 ]
Hasan, Khalid [3 ]
Elramadi, Ahmed [4 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [5 ]
机构
[1] Christine M Kleinert Inst, Orthopaed, Louisville, KY USA
[2] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Orthopaed, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Hamad Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Doha, Qatar
[5] Hamad Med Corpora, Orthoped, Doha, Qatar
关键词
postoperative outcomes; comparison between two surgical procedures; proximal femoral nail; dynamic hip screw fixation; stable intertrochanteric fracture; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; ANTIROTATION; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33366
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionDynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) are two well-accepted modes of surgical treatments for intertrochanteric (IT) hip fractures. While studies have extensively explored the efficacy of one over the other in unstable fractures, the comparison is sparsely available for stable fractures. The main aim of this study is to compare DHS or PFN corrective surgeries in cases of stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective data review of all stable IT fractures operated at the Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar, between 2016 and 2018. Data were extracted from electronic medical CERNER records, including demographics, clinical notes, operative reports, radiographs, and imaging reports. Data review was followed by prospective data collection via phone about the current post-operative functional status of all cases. Data analysis was done on SPSS v.23. Study was approved by Medical Research Center (MRC) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC). Study Protocol ID: MRC-01-19-108ResultsOut of 62 stable IT fractures operated at our center during the study period, 42 underwent DHS correction, while 20 had PFN. The mean age of the studied cohort was 66.56 years (+/- 15.95). Males were twice more than females. The mean duration of surgery was 83.73 minutes for DHS and 120.25 minutes for PFN. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Differences in intraoperative blood loss, duration between fracture and surgery, and length of hospital stay were all statistically insignificant. Patients who underwent PFN showed a higher frequency of return to ambulation (assisted and unassisted), while the number of patients with DHS was less for the functional outcome. Similarly, more post-PFN radiographs displayed union than post-DHS radiographs (55% and 38%, respectively). This difference was statistically insignificant.ConclusionOur study showed promising results for stable IT fractures treated with PFN. However, more data and prospective observational studies are required to establish more statistically significant results.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING AND DYNAMIC HIP SCREW FOR INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES IN ADULTS
    Koduru, Satya Kumar
    Potluri, Siddharth
    Rao, C. Hanumantha
    Raghav, Srinivas T.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (35): : 2018 - 2021
  • [2] PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAILING VERSUS DYNAMIC HIP SCREW IN MANAGEMENT OF STABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMUR FRACTURES: A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL OUTCOMES
    Pehlivanoglu, Tuna
    Bayram, Serkan
    Demirel, Mehmet
    Chodza, Mehmet
    Kocazeybek, Emre
    Salduz, Ahmet
    Akgul, Turgut
    Yazicioglu, Onder
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2021, 84 (04): : 514 - 520
  • [3] Type II Intertrochanteric Fractures: Proximal Femoral Nailing (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)
    Jonnes, Cyril
    Shishir, S. M.
    Najimudeen, Syed
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2016, 4 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [4] A Comparative Study of Functional Outcome Following Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur
    Prakash, Anil Kumar
    Nagakumar, J. S.
    Shanthappa, Arun H.
    Venkataraman, Sagar
    Kamath, Amith
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [5] Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures
    Upadhyay, Sachin
    Raza, H. K. T.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 22 (01) : 130 - 131
  • [6] Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures
    Dhamangaonkar, Anoop C.
    Joshi, Deepak
    Goregaonkar, Arvind B.
    Tawari, Akhil A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (03) : 317 - 322
  • [7] Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures Reply
    Dhamangaonkar, Anoop C.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 22 (01): : 131 - 132
  • [8] SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES: A STUDY USING DYNAMIC HIP SCREW AND PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL
    Rao, D. Venkateswara
    Kumar, Chinta Shyam
    Sangepu, Anvesh
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (66): : 11440 - 11445
  • [9] Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw
    Guven, M.
    Yavuz, U.
    Kadioglu, B.
    Akman, B.
    Kilincoglu, V.
    Unay, K.
    Altintas, F.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2010, 96 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [10] A comparative study of proximal femoral locking compress plate, proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures
    Zang, W.
    Liu, P. -F.
    Han, X. F.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 : 119 - 123