Research on the Uncertainty of Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Various Data-Driven Models and Attribute Interval Division

被引:5
|
作者
Xing, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Yang [2 ]
Huang, Saipeng [3 ]
Xie, Wei [4 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Xiang, Yunfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Inst Trade & Commerce, Sch Informat Technol, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[3] Northeast Petr Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Haixi Inst, Quanzhou Equipment Mfg Res Ctr, Quanzhou 362216, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
landslide susceptibility; uncertainty analysis; attribute interval numbers; data driven model; engineering geology; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DISPLACEMENT PREDICTION; DECOMPOSITION; FRAMEWORK; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/rs15082149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two significant uncertainties that are crucial for landslide susceptibility prediction modeling are attribute interval numbers (AIN) division of continuous landslide impact factors in frequency ratio analysis and various susceptibility prediction models. Five continuous landslide impact factor interval attribute classifications (4, 8, 12, 16, 20) and three data-driven models (deep belief networks (DBN), random forest (RF), and neural network (back propagation (BP)) were used for a total of fifteen different scenarios of landslide susceptibility prediction studies in order to investigate the effects of these two factors on modeling and perform a landslide susceptibility index uncertainty analysis (including precision evaluation and statistical law). The findings indicate that: (1) The results demonstrate that for the same model, as the interval attribute value rises from 4 to 8 and finally to 20, the forecast accuracy of landslide susceptibility initially increases gradually, then progressively grows until stable. (2) The DBN model, followed by the RF and BP models, provides the highest prediction accuracy for the same interval attribute value. (3) AIN = 20 and DBN models have the highest prediction accuracy under 15 combined conditions, while AIN = 4 and BP models have the lowest. The accuracy and efficiency of landslide susceptibility modeling are higher when the AIN = 8 and DBN models are combined. (4) The landslide susceptibility index uncertainty predicted by the deeper learning model and the bigger interval attribute value is comparatively low, which is more in line with the real landslide probability distribution features. The conditions that the environmental component attribute interval is divided into eight parts and DBN models are used allow for the efficient and accurate construction of the landslide susceptibility prediction model.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Data-Driven Combination-Interval Prediction for Landslide Displacement Based on Copula and VMD-WOA-KELM Method
    Longqi Li
    Yunhuang Yang
    Tianzhi Zhou
    Mengyun Wang
    Journal of Earth Science, 2025, 36 (01) : 291 - 306
  • [42] Research on Uncertainty of Landslide Susceptibility Prediction-Bibliometrics and Knowledge Graph Analysis
    Yang, Zhengli
    Liu, Chao
    Nie, Ruihua
    Zhang, Wanchang
    Zhang, Leili
    Zhang, Zhijie
    Li, Weile
    Liu, Gang
    Dai, Xiaoai
    Zhang, Donghui
    Zhang, Min
    Miao, Shuangxi
    Fu, Xiao
    Ren, Zhiming
    Lu, Heng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [43] Long Term Interval Forecasts of Demand using Data-Driven Dynamic Regression Models
    Liang, You
    Thavaneswaran, Aerambamoorthy
    2022 IEEE 46TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2022), 2022, : 250 - 259
  • [44] National-scale data-driven rainfall induced landslide susceptibility mapping for China by accounting for incomplete landslide data
    Qigen Lin
    Pedro Lima
    Stefan Steger
    Thomas Glade
    Tong Jiang
    Jiahui Zhang
    Tianxue Liu
    Ying Wang
    Geoscience Frontiers, 2021, 12 (06) : 268 - 282
  • [45] National-scale data-driven rainfall induced landslide susceptibility mapping for China by accounting for incomplete landslide data
    Lin, Qigen
    Lima, Pedro
    Steger, Stefan
    Glade, Thomas
    Jiang, Tong
    Zhang, Jiahui
    Liu, Tianxue
    Wang, Ying
    GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (06)
  • [46] Application and Uncertainty Analysis of Data-Driven and Process-Based Evapotranspiration Models Across Various Ecosystems
    Qinghe Wang
    Na Liu
    Shunqing Zhong
    Wulin Jiang
    Water Resources Management, 2024, 38 : 2359 - 2376
  • [47] Data-driven uncertainty quantification in macroscopic traffic flow models
    Alexandra Würth
    Mickaël Binois
    Paola Goatin
    Simone Göttlich
    Advances in Computational Mathematics, 2022, 48
  • [48] Application and Uncertainty Analysis of Data-Driven and Process-Based Evapotranspiration Models Across Various Ecosystems
    Wang, Qinghe
    Liu, Na
    Zhong, Shunqing
    Jiang, Wulin
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (07) : 2359 - 2376
  • [49] Data-driven uncertainty quantification in computational human head models
    Upadhyay, Kshitiz
    Giovanis, Dimitris G.
    Alshareef, Ahmed
    Knutsen, Andrew K.
    Johnson, Curtis L.
    Carass, Aaron
    Bayly, Philip, V
    Shields, Michael D.
    Ramesh, K. T.
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 398
  • [50] Data-driven models in machine learning for crime prediction
    Wawrzyniak, Zbigniew M.
    Jankowski, Stanislaw
    Szczechla, Eliza
    Szymanski, Zbigniew
    Pytlak, Radoslaw
    Michalak, Pawel
    Borowik, Grzegorz
    2018 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ICSENG 2018), 2018,