Research on the Uncertainty of Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Various Data-Driven Models and Attribute Interval Division

被引:5
|
作者
Xing, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Yang [2 ]
Huang, Saipeng [3 ]
Xie, Wei [4 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Xiang, Yunfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Inst Trade & Commerce, Sch Informat Technol, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[3] Northeast Petr Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Haixi Inst, Quanzhou Equipment Mfg Res Ctr, Quanzhou 362216, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
landslide susceptibility; uncertainty analysis; attribute interval numbers; data driven model; engineering geology; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DISPLACEMENT PREDICTION; DECOMPOSITION; FRAMEWORK; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/rs15082149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two significant uncertainties that are crucial for landslide susceptibility prediction modeling are attribute interval numbers (AIN) division of continuous landslide impact factors in frequency ratio analysis and various susceptibility prediction models. Five continuous landslide impact factor interval attribute classifications (4, 8, 12, 16, 20) and three data-driven models (deep belief networks (DBN), random forest (RF), and neural network (back propagation (BP)) were used for a total of fifteen different scenarios of landslide susceptibility prediction studies in order to investigate the effects of these two factors on modeling and perform a landslide susceptibility index uncertainty analysis (including precision evaluation and statistical law). The findings indicate that: (1) The results demonstrate that for the same model, as the interval attribute value rises from 4 to 8 and finally to 20, the forecast accuracy of landslide susceptibility initially increases gradually, then progressively grows until stable. (2) The DBN model, followed by the RF and BP models, provides the highest prediction accuracy for the same interval attribute value. (3) AIN = 20 and DBN models have the highest prediction accuracy under 15 combined conditions, while AIN = 4 and BP models have the lowest. The accuracy and efficiency of landslide susceptibility modeling are higher when the AIN = 8 and DBN models are combined. (4) The landslide susceptibility index uncertainty predicted by the deeper learning model and the bigger interval attribute value is comparatively low, which is more in line with the real landslide probability distribution features. The conditions that the environmental component attribute interval is divided into eight parts and DBN models are used allow for the efficient and accurate construction of the landslide susceptibility prediction model.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantifying Streamflow Prediction Uncertainty Through Process-Aware Data-Driven Models
    Roy, Abhinanda
    Kasiviswanathan, K. S.
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2024, 38 (11)
  • [22] Data-Driven Models for Sewer Blockage Prediction
    Hassouna, Mohammed
    Reis, Marta
    Al Fairuz, Mohamed
    Tarhini, Ali
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING (ICCECE), 2019, : 68 - 72
  • [23] Crisp discharge forecasts and grey uncertainty bands using data-driven models
    Alvisi, S.
    Creaco, E.
    Franchini, M.
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 43 (05): : 589 - 602
  • [24] Uncertainty in regional scale assessment of landslide susceptibility using various resolutions
    Ge Yan
    Guoan Tang
    Sijin Li
    Dingyang Lu
    Liyang Xiong
    Shouyun Liang
    Natural Hazards, 2023, 117 : 399 - 423
  • [25] Energy price prediction using data-driven models: A decade review
    Lu, Hongfang
    Ma, Xin
    Ma, Minda
    Zhu, Senlin
    COMPUTER SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 39
  • [26] Uncertainty in regional scale assessment of landslide susceptibility using various resolutions
    Yan, Ge
    Tang, Guoan
    Li, Sijin
    Lu, Dingyang
    Xiong, Liyang
    Liang, Shouyun
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 117 (01) : 399 - 423
  • [27] A similarity-based approach to sampling absence data for landslide susceptibility mapping using data-driven methods
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Miao, Yamin
    Liu, Junzhi
    Bai, Shibiao
    Zeng, Canying
    Ma, Tianwu
    Hong, Haoyuan
    CATENA, 2019, 183
  • [28] Interval Prediction Models for Data-Driven Design of Aerial Vehicle's Robust Adaptive Controllers
    Fravolini, Mario Luca
    Costante, Gabriele
    Yucelen, Tansel
    Napolitano, Marcello Rosario
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2020, 43 (08) : 1512 - 1528
  • [29] Research on flame prediction in a scramjet combustor using a data-driven model
    Kong, Chen
    Wang, Ziao
    Zhang, Junlong
    Wang, Xuan
    Wang, Kai
    Li, Yunfei
    Chang, Juntao
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2022, 34 (06)
  • [30] A comparative study of an expert knowledge-based model and two data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Zhu, A-Xing
    Miao, Yamin
    Wang, Rongxun
    Zhu, Tongxin
    Deng, Yongcui
    Liu, Junzhi
    Yang, Lin
    Qin, Cheng-Zhi
    Hong, Haoyuan
    CATENA, 2018, 166 : 317 - 327