Research on the Uncertainty of Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Various Data-Driven Models and Attribute Interval Division

被引:5
|
作者
Xing, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Yang [2 ]
Huang, Saipeng [3 ]
Xie, Wei [4 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Xiang, Yunfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Inst Trade & Commerce, Sch Informat Technol, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[3] Northeast Petr Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Haixi Inst, Quanzhou Equipment Mfg Res Ctr, Quanzhou 362216, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
landslide susceptibility; uncertainty analysis; attribute interval numbers; data driven model; engineering geology; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DISPLACEMENT PREDICTION; DECOMPOSITION; FRAMEWORK; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/rs15082149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two significant uncertainties that are crucial for landslide susceptibility prediction modeling are attribute interval numbers (AIN) division of continuous landslide impact factors in frequency ratio analysis and various susceptibility prediction models. Five continuous landslide impact factor interval attribute classifications (4, 8, 12, 16, 20) and three data-driven models (deep belief networks (DBN), random forest (RF), and neural network (back propagation (BP)) were used for a total of fifteen different scenarios of landslide susceptibility prediction studies in order to investigate the effects of these two factors on modeling and perform a landslide susceptibility index uncertainty analysis (including precision evaluation and statistical law). The findings indicate that: (1) The results demonstrate that for the same model, as the interval attribute value rises from 4 to 8 and finally to 20, the forecast accuracy of landslide susceptibility initially increases gradually, then progressively grows until stable. (2) The DBN model, followed by the RF and BP models, provides the highest prediction accuracy for the same interval attribute value. (3) AIN = 20 and DBN models have the highest prediction accuracy under 15 combined conditions, while AIN = 4 and BP models have the lowest. The accuracy and efficiency of landslide susceptibility modeling are higher when the AIN = 8 and DBN models are combined. (4) The landslide susceptibility index uncertainty predicted by the deeper learning model and the bigger interval attribute value is comparatively low, which is more in line with the real landslide probability distribution features. The conditions that the environmental component attribute interval is divided into eight parts and DBN models are used allow for the efficient and accurate construction of the landslide susceptibility prediction model.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial Uncertainty of Target Patterns Generated by Different Prediction Models of Landslide Susceptibility
    Fabbri, Andrea G.
    Patera, Antonio
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [32] Comparative review of data-driven landslide susceptibility models: case study in the Eastern Andes mountain range of Colombia
    Wilmar Calderón-Guevara
    Mauricio Sánchez-Silva
    Bogdan Nitescu
    Daniel F. Villarraga
    Natural Hazards, 2022, 113 : 1105 - 1132
  • [33] Comparative review of data-driven landslide susceptibility models: case study in the Eastern Andes mountain range of Colombia
    Calderon-Guevara, Wilmar
    Sanchez-Silva, Mauricio
    Nitescu, Bogdan
    Villarraga, Daniel F.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 113 (02) : 1105 - 1132
  • [34] Space-Time Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Based on Data-Driven Methods
    Fang, Zhice
    Wang, Yi
    van Westen, Cees
    Lombardo, Luigi
    MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 56 (06) : 1335 - 1354
  • [35] Physics-informed optimization for a data-driven approach in landslide susceptibility evaluation
    Liu, Songlin
    Wang, Luqi
    Zhang, Wengang
    Sun, Weixin
    Wang, Yunhao
    Liu, Jianping
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 16 (08) : 3192 - 3205
  • [36] On the estimation of landslide intensity, hazard and density via data-driven models
    Di Napoli, Mariano
    Tanyas, Hakan
    Castro-Camilo, Daniela
    Calcaterra, Domenico
    Cevasco, Andrea
    Di Martire, Diego
    Pepe, Giacomo
    Brandolini, Pierluigi
    Lombardo, Luigi
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 119 (03) : 1513 - 1530
  • [37] Comparison of data-driven models of loess landslide runout distance estimation
    Xu, Qiang
    Li, Huajin
    He, Yusen
    Liu, Fangzhou
    Peng, Dalei
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 78 (02) : 1281 - 1294
  • [38] Comparison of data-driven models of loess landslide runout distance estimation
    Qiang Xu
    Huajin Li
    Yusen He
    Fangzhou Liu
    Dalei Peng
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78 : 1281 - 1294
  • [39] On the estimation of landslide intensity, hazard and density via data-driven models
    Mariano Di Napoli
    Hakan Tanyas
    Daniela Castro-Camilo
    Domenico Calcaterra
    Andrea Cevasco
    Diego Di Martire
    Giacomo Pepe
    Pierluigi Brandolini
    Luigi Lombardo
    Natural Hazards, 2023, 119 : 1513 - 1530
  • [40] Data-Driven Combination-Interval Prediction for Landslide Displacement Based on Copula and VMD-WOA-KELM Method
    Li, Longqi
    Yang, Yunhuang
    Zhou, Tianzhi
    Wang, Mengyun
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2025, 36 (01) : 291 - 306