Research on the Uncertainty of Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Various Data-Driven Models and Attribute Interval Division

被引:5
|
作者
Xing, Yin [1 ]
Chen, Yang [2 ]
Huang, Saipeng [3 ]
Xie, Wei [4 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Xiang, Yunfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Inst Trade & Commerce, Sch Informat Technol, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[3] Northeast Petr Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Continental Shale Hydrocarbon Accumulat &, Daqing 163318, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Haixi Inst, Quanzhou Equipment Mfg Res Ctr, Quanzhou 362216, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
landslide susceptibility; uncertainty analysis; attribute interval numbers; data driven model; engineering geology; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DISPLACEMENT PREDICTION; DECOMPOSITION; FRAMEWORK; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/rs15082149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two significant uncertainties that are crucial for landslide susceptibility prediction modeling are attribute interval numbers (AIN) division of continuous landslide impact factors in frequency ratio analysis and various susceptibility prediction models. Five continuous landslide impact factor interval attribute classifications (4, 8, 12, 16, 20) and three data-driven models (deep belief networks (DBN), random forest (RF), and neural network (back propagation (BP)) were used for a total of fifteen different scenarios of landslide susceptibility prediction studies in order to investigate the effects of these two factors on modeling and perform a landslide susceptibility index uncertainty analysis (including precision evaluation and statistical law). The findings indicate that: (1) The results demonstrate that for the same model, as the interval attribute value rises from 4 to 8 and finally to 20, the forecast accuracy of landslide susceptibility initially increases gradually, then progressively grows until stable. (2) The DBN model, followed by the RF and BP models, provides the highest prediction accuracy for the same interval attribute value. (3) AIN = 20 and DBN models have the highest prediction accuracy under 15 combined conditions, while AIN = 4 and BP models have the lowest. The accuracy and efficiency of landslide susceptibility modeling are higher when the AIN = 8 and DBN models are combined. (4) The landslide susceptibility index uncertainty predicted by the deeper learning model and the bigger interval attribute value is comparatively low, which is more in line with the real landslide probability distribution features. The conditions that the environmental component attribute interval is divided into eight parts and DBN models are used allow for the efficient and accurate construction of the landslide susceptibility prediction model.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty study of landslide susceptibility prediction considering the different attribute interval numbers of environmental factors and different data-based models
    Huang, Faming
    Ye, Zhou
    Jiang, Shui-Hua
    Huang, Jinsong
    Chang, Zhilu
    Chen, Jiawu
    CATENA, 2021, 202
  • [2] Comparison of optimized data-driven models for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Ghayur Sadigh, Armin
    Alesheikh, Ali Asghar
    Jun, Changhyun
    Lee, Saro
    Nielson, Jeffrey R.
    Panahi, Mahdi
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (06) : 14665 - 14692
  • [3] Mapping landslide susceptibility using data-driven methods
    Zezere, J. L.
    Pereira, S.
    Melo, R.
    Oliveira, S. C.
    Garcia, R. A. C.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 589 : 250 - 267
  • [4] Uncertainties of Landslide Susceptibility Prediction: Different Attribute Interval Divisions of Environmental Factors and Different Data-Based Models
    Huang, Faming
    Ye, Zhou
    Yao, Chi
    Li, Yuanyao
    Yin, Kunlong
    Huang, Jinsong
    Jiang, Qinghui
    Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2020, 45 (12): : 4535 - 4549
  • [5] Comparison of hybrid data-driven and physical models for landslide susceptibility mapping at regional scales
    Wei, Xin
    Zhang, Lulu
    Gardoni, Paolo
    Chen, Yangming
    Tan, Lin
    Liu, Dongsheng
    Du, Chunlan
    Li, Hai
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2023, 18 (08) : 4453 - 4476
  • [6] Comparison of hybrid data-driven and physical models for landslide susceptibility mapping at regional scales
    Xin Wei
    Lulu Zhang
    Paolo Gardoni
    Yangming Chen
    Lin Tan
    Dongsheng Liu
    Chunlan Du
    Hai Li
    Acta Geotechnica, 2023, 18 : 4453 - 4476
  • [7] GIS-based data-driven bivariate statistical models for landslide susceptibility prediction in Upper Tista Basin, India
    Das, Jayanta
    Saha, Pritam
    Mitra, Rajib
    Alam, Asraful
    Kamruzzaman, Md
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [8] Monthly prediction of streamflow using data-driven models
    Yaghoubi, Behrouz
    Hosseini, Seyed Abbas
    Nazif, Sara
    JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2019, 128 (06)
  • [9] Monthly prediction of streamflow using data-driven models
    Behrouz Yaghoubi
    Seyed Abbas Hosseini
    Sara Nazif
    Journal of Earth System Science, 2019, 128
  • [10] Integrating data-driven and physically based landslide susceptibility methods using matrix models to predict reservoir landslides
    Xue, Zhenghai
    Feng, Wenkai
    Yi, Xiaoyu
    Dun, Jiawei
    Wu, Mingtang
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2024, 73 (03) : 1702 - 1720