A nonconvex model-based combined geometric calibration scheme for micro cone-beam CT with irregular trajectories

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Guang [1 ]
Chen, Xue [1 ]
You, Chenyu [2 ]
Huang, Xinhai [1 ]
Deng, Zhenhao [1 ]
Luo, Shouhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Jiangsu Key Lab Biomat & Devices, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Yale Univ, Image Proc & Anal Grp IPAG, New Haven, CT USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cone-beam CT; geometric calibration; irregular trajectory; MISALIGNMENT CORRECTION; SELF-CALIBRATION; PARAMETERS; RECONSTRUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; ALIGNMENT; DETECTOR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16257
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundMany dedicated cone-beam CT (CBCT) systems have irregular scanning trajectories. Compared with the standard CBCT calibration, accurate calibration for CBCT systems with irregular trajectories is a more complex task, since the geometric parameters for each scanning view are variable. Most of the existing calibration methods assume that the intrinsic geometric relationship of the fiducials in the phantom is precisely known, and rarely delve deeper into the issue of whether the phantom accuracy is adapted to the calibration model. PurposeA high-precision phantom and a highly robust calibration model are interdependent and mutually supportive, and they are both important for calibration accuracy, especially for the high-resolution CBCT. Therefore, we propose a calibration scheme that considers both accurate phantom measurement and robust geometric calibration. MethodsOur proposed scheme consists of two parts: (1) introducing a measurement model to acquire the accurate intrinsic geometric relationship of the fiducials in the phantom; (2) developing a highly noise-robust nonconvex model-based calibration method. The measurement model in the first part is achieved by extending our previous high-precision geometric calibration model suitable for CBCT with circular trajectories. In the second part, a novel iterative method with optimization constraints based on a back-projection model is developed to solve the geometric parameters of each view. ResultsThe simulations and real experiments show that the measurement errors of the fiducial ball bearings (BBs) are within the subpixel level. With the help of the geometric relationship of the BBs obtained by our measurement method, the classic calibration method can achieve good calibration based on far fewer BBs. All metrics obtained in simulated experiments as well as in real experiments on Micro CT systems with resolutions of 9 and 4.5 mu m show that the proposed calibration method has higher calibration accuracy than the competing classic method. It is particularly worth noting that although our measurement model proves to be very accurate, the classic calibration method based on this measurement model can only achieve good calibration results when the resolution of the measurement system is close to that of the system to be calibrated, but our calibration scheme enables high-accuracy calibration even when the resolution of the system to be calibrated is twice that of the measurement system. ConclusionsThe proposed combined geometrical calibration scheme does not rely on a phantom with an intricate pattern of fiducials, so it is applicable in Micro CT with high resolution. The two parts of the scheme, the "measurement model" and the "calibration model," prove to be of high accuracy. The combination of these two models can effectively improve the calibration accuracy, especially in some extreme cases.
引用
收藏
页码:2759 / 2774
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Practical Geometric Calibration Method of Cone-Beam CT System Using Simple Handmade Phantom
    Wu, S. Y.
    Li, H. W.
    Qi, H. L.
    Luo, Y. B.
    Zhen, X.
    Xu, Y.
    Zhou, L. H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2015, 5 (08) : 1915 - 1920
  • [22] Cone-Beam Micro-CT System Based on LabVIEW Software
    Ciprian N. Ionita
    Keneth R. Hoffmann
    Daniel R. Bednarek
    Ravishankar Chityala
    Stephen Rudin
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2008, 21 : 296 - 305
  • [23] Cone-beam Micro-CT system based on LabVIEW software
    Ionita, Ciprian N.
    Hoffmann, Keneth R.
    Bednarek, Daniel R.
    Chityala, Ravishankar
    Rudin, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2008, 21 (03) : 296 - 305
  • [24] Model-based registration for pneumothorax deformation analysis using intraoperative cone-beam CT images
    Maekawa, Hinako
    Nakao, Megumi
    Mineura, Katsutaka
    Chen-Yoshikawa, Toyofumi F.
    Matsuda, Tetsuya
    42ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY: ENABLING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR GLOBAL HEALTHCARE EMBC'20, 2020, : 5818 - 5821
  • [25] Fast cone-beam computed tomography geometric calibration method based on measuring tools
    Zhang C.
    Huang K.
    Chen H.
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2019, 40 (01): : 175 - 182
  • [26] A Self-Contained Calibration Scheme for Micro-CT With Irregular Trajectories Based on Phantom Auto-Measurement
    Li, Guang
    Huang, Xinyu
    Chen, Xue
    Wang, Huiru
    Zhou, Langrui
    Ji, Xu
    Chen, Yang
    Luo, Shouhua
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2025, 74
  • [27] Physical Model-Based Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) Scheme for a 3D Cone-Beam CT Extremity Imaging System
    Yang, D.
    Senn, R. A.
    Packard, N.
    Richard, S.
    Yorkston, J.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [28] A new weighting scheme for arc based circle cone-beam CT reconstruction
    Wang, Wei
    Xia, Xiang-Gen
    He, Chuanjiang
    Ren, Zemin
    Lu, Jian
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 30 (01) : 145 - 163
  • [29] A model-based scatter artifacts correction for cone beam CT
    Zhao, Wei
    Vernekohl, Don
    Zhu, Jun
    Wang, Luyao
    Xing, Lei
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (04) : 1736 - 1753
  • [30] A Graphical Method for Determining the In-Plane Rotation Angle in Geometric Calibration of Circular Cone-Beam CT Systems
    Xu, Jingyan
    Tsui, Benjamin M. W.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 31 (03) : 825 - 833