Toward the application of a machine learning framework for building life cycle energy assessment

被引:9
|
作者
Venkatraj, V. [1 ,4 ]
Dixit, M. K. [1 ]
Yan, W. [2 ]
Caffey, S. [2 ]
Sideris, P. [3 ]
Aryal, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] 38880 Guardino Dr, Fremont, CA 94536 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life cycle energy; Embodied energy; Operating energy; Machine learning; Supervised learning; Building life cycle energy assessment; Building load prediction; Building performance analysis; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; EMBODIED ENERGY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; PREDICTION METHOD; COOLING LOADS; CONSUMPTION; DESIGN; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113444
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry in the United States consumes more than 50% of the global energy supply per year, suggesting that significant efforts may be needed to reduce building energy demand and its carbon footprint. During their lifespans, buildings consume embodied energy (EE) and operational energy (OE). Building professionals, therefore, conduct life cycle energy assessments (LCEA) to quantify and understand the paradox and interconnectedness between EE and OE. Traditionally, simulation-based optimization techniques were used for design space exploration to identify a building design with the fewest energy implications. However, literature shows these data-driven approaches are often error-prone, time-consuming, and computationally expensive, and they fail to provide real-time feedback to the user. Moreover, EE and OE assessment tools are disjointed and suffer from interoperability issues. These limitations restrict design space exploration, which eventually hinders the design decision-making process. Over the last few years, the increased availability of building data has made machine learning (ML) techniques a popular choice for building performance assessments. Several articles have developed prediction models to assess or optimize OE. While this work is significant, studies utilizing ML techniques for building LCEA are lacking, mainly due to the unavailability of a large-scale LCEA database. In this paper, we propose a methodology to (1) generate a simulation-based building energy dataset for different building typologies using a parametric framework, (2) utilize the synthetically generated database to develop an ML-based prediction model to predict EE and OE, and (3) test the model using a case study. The case study results show that the model achieves high prediction performance using minimal inputs available during the early design phase. The results further indicate that ML techniques can be used by building designers with no or limited LCE expertise to instantaneously estimate building LCE performance and help them select design options with minimal LCE consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine learning for embodied carbon life cycle assessment of buildings
    Hamza El Hafdaoui
    Ahmed Khallaayoun
    Ibtissam Bouarfa
    Kamar Ouazzani
    Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 2023, 14 (3): : 188 - 200
  • [32] A review of machine learning applications in life cycle assessment studies
    Romeiko, Xiaobo Xue
    Zhang, Xuesong
    Pang, Yulei
    Gao, Feng
    Xu, Ming
    Lin, Shao
    Babbitt, Callie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 912
  • [33] Developing a dynamic life cycle assessment framework for buildings through integrating building information modeling and building energy modeling program
    Yang, Tingyi
    Dong, Yahong
    Tang, Bainan
    Xu, Zhenyan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 946
  • [34] A framework for energy use indicators and their reporting in life cycle assessment
    Arvidsson, Rickard
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 12 (03) : 429 - 436
  • [35] A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cycle
    Suresh, Harini
    Guttag, John
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON EQUITY AND ACCESS IN ALGORITHMS, MECHANISMS, AND OPTIMIZATION, EAAMO 2021, 2021,
  • [36] Application of machine learning to estimate building energy use intensities
    Veiga, R. K.
    Veloso, A. C.
    Melo, A. P.
    Lamberts, R.
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 249
  • [37] Application of Machine Learning in Forecasting Energy Usage of Building Design
    Truong Xuan Dan
    Phan Nguyen Ky Phuc
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN TECHNOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (GTSD), 2018, : 53 - 59
  • [38] Machine Learning & Uncertainty Quantification: Application in Building Energy Consumption
    Fakour, Fahimeh
    Parhizkar, Tarannom
    Ramezani, Ramin
    Mosleh, Ali
    2022 68TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2022), 2022,
  • [39] Building life cycle analysis toward low carbon emission and energy efficiency
    Moayedi, Farzaneh
    Zawawi, Noor Amila Wan Abdullah
    Liew, Mohd Shahir
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERING POST GRADUATE CONFERENCE (SEPKA) / 3RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EXPERTISE OF ENGINEERING DESIGN (ISEED), 2018, 2019, 220
  • [40] Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Rincon, Lidia
    Vilarino, Virginia
    Perez, Gabriel
    Castell, Albert
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 394 - 416