Toward the application of a machine learning framework for building life cycle energy assessment

被引:9
|
作者
Venkatraj, V. [1 ,4 ]
Dixit, M. K. [1 ]
Yan, W. [2 ]
Caffey, S. [2 ]
Sideris, P. [3 ]
Aryal, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] 38880 Guardino Dr, Fremont, CA 94536 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Life cycle energy; Embodied energy; Operating energy; Machine learning; Supervised learning; Building life cycle energy assessment; Building load prediction; Building performance analysis; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; EMBODIED ENERGY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; PREDICTION METHOD; COOLING LOADS; CONSUMPTION; DESIGN; ANN;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113444
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction industry in the United States consumes more than 50% of the global energy supply per year, suggesting that significant efforts may be needed to reduce building energy demand and its carbon footprint. During their lifespans, buildings consume embodied energy (EE) and operational energy (OE). Building professionals, therefore, conduct life cycle energy assessments (LCEA) to quantify and understand the paradox and interconnectedness between EE and OE. Traditionally, simulation-based optimization techniques were used for design space exploration to identify a building design with the fewest energy implications. However, literature shows these data-driven approaches are often error-prone, time-consuming, and computationally expensive, and they fail to provide real-time feedback to the user. Moreover, EE and OE assessment tools are disjointed and suffer from interoperability issues. These limitations restrict design space exploration, which eventually hinders the design decision-making process. Over the last few years, the increased availability of building data has made machine learning (ML) techniques a popular choice for building performance assessments. Several articles have developed prediction models to assess or optimize OE. While this work is significant, studies utilizing ML techniques for building LCEA are lacking, mainly due to the unavailability of a large-scale LCEA database. In this paper, we propose a methodology to (1) generate a simulation-based building energy dataset for different building typologies using a parametric framework, (2) utilize the synthetically generated database to develop an ML-based prediction model to predict EE and OE, and (3) test the model using a case study. The case study results show that the model achieves high prediction performance using minimal inputs available during the early design phase. The results further indicate that ML techniques can be used by building designers with no or limited LCE expertise to instantaneously estimate building LCE performance and help them select design options with minimal LCE consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building
    Collinge, William O.
    Landis, Amy E.
    Jones, Alex K.
    Schaefer, Laura A.
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (03): : 538 - 552
  • [2] Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building
    William O. Collinge
    Amy E. Landis
    Alex K. Jones
    Laura A. Schaefer
    Melissa M. Bilec
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 538 - 552
  • [3] Erratum to: Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building
    William O. Collinge
    Amy E. Landis
    Alex K. Jones
    Laura A. Schaefer
    Melissa M. Bilec
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 (3) : 745 - 746
  • [4] Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: a literature review
    Ali Ghoroghi
    Yacine Rezgui
    Ioan Petri
    Thomas Beach
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 433 - 456
  • [5] Advances in application of machine learning to life cycle assessment: a literature review
    Ghoroghi, Ali
    Rezgui, Yacine
    Petri, Ioan
    Beach, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (03): : 433 - 456
  • [6] Frameworks for the application of machine learning in life cycle assessment for process modeling
    Martinez-Ramon, Nicolas
    Calvo-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 14
  • [7] Application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and extenics theory for building energy conservation assessment
    Zheng, Guozhong
    Jing, Youyin
    Huang, Hongxia
    Zhang, Xutao
    Gao, Yuefen
    ENERGY, 2009, 34 (11) : 1870 - 1879
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of Building Energy in Big-data Era: Theory and Framework
    Yuan, Yan
    Jin, Zhonghua
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORK AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR COMPUTERS (ICNISC), 2015, : 601 - 605
  • [9] An integrated life cycle assessment and energy simulation framework for residential building walling systems
    Mahlan, Supriya
    Francis, Ann
    Thumuganti, Vaishnavi
    Thomas, Albert
    Sadick, Abdul-Manan
    Tokede, Olubukola
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 257
  • [10] Toward a comprehensive life cycle aquatic ecotoxicity assessment via machine learning: Application to coal power generation in China
    Li, Danyu
    Qin, Ji
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 445